Outcome of hematopoietic cell transplantation for DNA double-strand break repair disorders

Background: Rare DNA breakage repair disorders predispose to infection and lymphoreticular malignancies. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is curative, but coadministered chemotherapy or radiotherapy is damaging because of systemic radiosensitivity. We collected HCT outcome data for Nijmegen breakage syndrome, DNA ligase IV deficiency, Cernunnos-XRCC4-like factor (Cernunnos-XLF) deficiency, and ataxia-telangiectasia (AT). Methods: Data from 38 centers worldwide, including indication, donor, conditioning regimen, graft-versus-host disease, and outcome, were analyzed. Conditioning was classified as myeloablative conditioning (MAC) if it contained radiotherapy or alkylators and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) if no alkylators and/or 150 mg/m(2) fludarabine or less and 40 mg/kg cyclophosphamide or less were used. Results: Fifty-five new, 14 updated, and 18 previously published patients were analyzed. Median age at HCT was 48 months (range, 1.5-552 months). Twenty-nine patients underwent transplantation for infection, 21 had malignancy, 13 had bone marrow failure, 13 received pre-emptive transplantation, 5 had multiple indications, and 6 had no information. Twenty-two received MAC, 59 received RIC, and 4 were infused; information was unavailable for 2 patients. Seventy-three of 77 patients with DNA ligase IV deficiency, Cernunnos-XLF deficiency, or Nijmegen breakage syndrome received conditioning. Survival was 53 (69%) of 77 and was worse for those receiving MAC than for those receiving RIC (P=.006). Most deaths occurred early after transplantation, suggesting poor tolerance of conditioning. Survival in patients with AT was 25%. Forty-one (49%) of 83 patients experienced acute GvHD, which was less frequent in those receiving RIC compared with those receiving MAC (26/56 [46%] vs 12/21 [57%], P=.45). Median follow-up was 35 months (range, 2-168 months). No secondary malignancies were reported during 15 years of follow-up. Growth and developmental delay remained after HCT; immune-mediated complications resolved. Conclusion: RIC HCT resolves DNA repair disorder associated immunodeficiency. Long-term follow-up is required for secondary malignancy surveillance. Routine HCT for AT is not recommended.Peer reviewe

Long-term follow-up of IPEX syndrome patients after different therapeutic strategies : an international multicenter retrospective study

Background: Immunodysregulation polyendocrinopathy enteropathy x-linked(IPEX) syndrome is a monogenic autoimmune disease caused by FOXP3 mutations. Because it is a rare disease, the natural history and response to treatments, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immunosuppression (IS), have not been thoroughly examined. Objective: This analysis sought to evaluate disease onset, progression, and long-term outcome of the 2 main treatments in long-term IPEX survivors. Methods: Clinical histories of 96 patients with a genetically proven IPEX syndrome were collected from 38 institutions worldwide and retrospectively analyzed. To investigate possible factors suitable to predict the outcome, an organ involvement (OI) scoring system was developed. Results: We confirm neonatal onset with enteropathy, type 1 diabetes, and eczema. In addition, we found less common manifestations in delayed onset patients or during disease evolution. There is no correlation between the site of mutation and the disease course or outcome, and the same genotype can present with variable phenotypes. HSCT patients (n = 58) had a median follow-up of 2.7 years (range, 1 week-15 years). Patients receiving chronic IS (n 5 34) had a median follow-up of 4 years (range, 2 months-25 years). The overall survival after HSCT was 73.2% (95% CI, 59.4-83.0) and after IS was 65.1% (95% CI, 62.8-95.8). The pretreatment OI score was the only significant predictor of overall survival after transplant (P = .035) but not under IS. Conclusions: Patients receiving chronic IS were hampered by disease recurrence or complications, impacting long-term.disease-free survival. When performed in patients with a low OI score, HSCT resulted in disease resolution with better quality of life, independent of age, donor source, or conditioning regimen

Ruxolitinib for Glucocorticoid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

BACKGROUND: Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation; not all patients have a response to standard glucocorticoid treatment. In a phase 2 trial, ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase (JAK1 and JAK2) inhibitor, showed potential efficacy in patients with glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy and safety of oral ruxolitinib (10 mg twice daily) with the investigator's choice of therapy from a list of nine commonly used options (control) in patients 12 years of age or older who had glucocorticoid-refractory acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. The primary end point was overall response (complete response or partial response) at day 28. The key secondary end point was durable overall response at day 56. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients underwent randomization; 154 patients were assigned to the ruxolitinib group and 155 to the control group. Overall response at day 28 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (62% [96 patients] vs. 39% [61]; odds ratio, 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65 to 4.22; P<0.001). Durable overall response at day 56 was higher in the ruxolitinib group than in the control group (40% [61 patients] vs. 22% [34]; odds ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.43 to 3.94; P<0.001). The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 10% in the ruxolitinib group and 39% in the control group. The median failure-free survival was considerably longer with ruxolitinib than with control (5.0 months vs. 1.0 month; hazard ratio for relapse or progression of hematologic disease, non-relapse-related death, or addition of new systemic therapy for acute GVHD, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.60). The median overall survival was 11.1 months in the ruxolitinib group and 6.5 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.15). The most common adverse events up to day 28 were thrombocytopenia (in 50 of 152 patients [33%] in the ruxolitinib group and 27 of 150 [18%] in the control group), anemia (in 46 [30%] and 42 [28%], respectively), and cytomegalovirus infection (in 39 [26%] and 31 [21%]). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib therapy led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, the most frequent toxic effect, than that observed with control therapy

Lymphohistiocytose familiale (rapport de 55 cas d'un centre et étude phénotype-génotype)

PARIS5-BU Méd.Cochin (751142101) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocCentre Technique Livre Ens. Sup. (774682301) / SudocSudocFranceF

Inolimomab for Children with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus‐Host Disease: A National Multicenter Phase II Retrospective Analysis

One hundred twenty-three children from 6 French centers were evaluated retrospectively for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) with Inolimomab, a murine anti-IL2R

Early mixed chimerism‐based preemptive immunotherapy in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

This retrospective analysis comprises 10-year experience with early posttransplant mixed chimerism-based preemptive intervention. Out of 104 patients, 51 received preemptive immunotherapy. Their outcomes were similar to patients achieving full donor chimerism spontaneously. Among patients receiving intervention, 5-year event-free survival was identical in patients with and without pretransplant residual disease, respectively (68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 38-98%] vs. 69% [95% CI 54-85%] log-rank = 0.4). In patients who received preemptive immunotherapy, chimerism status and residual disease prior to transplant were no longer predictors of poor outcome; however, 41% of the patients with residual disease prior to transplant relapsed early and did not benefit from this strategy

Management of car-t cell-related encephalopathy syndrome in adult and pediatric patients: recommendations of the french society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (sfgm-tc)

International audienceCAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) reflects the potential neurotoxicity of this therapeutic approach and must be considered in the presence of any neurological symptom after the infusion of the CAR-T. This is the second most common adverse event under this therapy and its incidence varies between 12 and 55%. The median time of the onset of the first neurologic symptoms is 4days after CAR-T infusion. The duration of CRES symptoms is generally between 2 and 4days, but late CRES may occur. Monitoring and diagnosis of CERS includes clinical exam, magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. In addition to symptomatic treatments, corticosteroids represent the cornerstone of the high-grade CERS treatment. Drugs targeting IL-6 should be restricted to severe forms, especially those associated with cytokine release syndrome. The purpose of this workshop is to provide practical help in dealing with this complication.L’encéphalopathie liée à l’utilisation des lymphocytes dotés de récepteur à l’antigène chimérique (CAR-T) (CAR-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome, CRES) traduit la neurotoxicité potentielle de cette approche thérapeutique et doit être envisagée devant la survenue de tout symptôme neurologique après l’infusion des cellules CAR-T. Il s’agit du second effet indésirable le plus fréquent sous cette thérapie et son incidence varie entre 12 et 55 % selon les études. Le délai médian de survenue des premiers symptômes neurologiques est de quatre jours suivant l’infusion de cellules CAR-T. La durée des symptômes du CRES est comprise généralement entre deux et quatre jours mais des CRES tardifs peuvent survenir. La surveillance fait appel notamment au suivi clinique, à l’imagerie par résonance magnétique et à l’électroencéphalographie. La prise en charge, en dehors des mesures symptomatiques, consiste, en premier lieu, en une corticothérapie, les thérapies ciblant IL-6 étant plutôt réservées aux formes sévères. Le but de cet atelier est d’apporter une aide pratique à la prise en charge de cette complication