Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost in Patients With Cervical Cancer Ineligible for Brachytherapy

Background: Standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy (BT). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a possible option for treating patients ineligible for BT. Patients and methods: From October 2012 to July 2020, nine women with cervical cancer received SBRT to high-risk volumes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rates of overall and disease-free survival. Results: The median age was 52 years; 88% of patients had squamous carcinoma. Reasons for forgoing BT were cervical canal stenosis, treatment refusal and hematological disease. The median boost dose was 18 Gy and the median dose per fraction was 6 Gy. Median follow-up was 16 months. The median survival was 24 months, the actuarial 2-year OS rate was 70%, and median disease-free survival was 11 months. One grade 3 late vaginal toxicity was reported. No acute nor late grade 4 toxicities were observed. Conclusion: SBRT boost in patients with cervical cancer ineligible for BT led to acceptable survival outcomes and a safe toxicity profile

Efficacy of residual site radiation therapy (ISRT) in patients with primary mediastinal lymphoma with Deauville Score 4 following R-CHT: results of a retrospective mono institutional study

Background: In order to evaluate the efficacy of residual site radiation therapy (RSRT) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary mediastinal lymphoma (PMBCL) with Deauville Score 4 (DS 4) following rituximab and chemotherapy treatment (R-ICHT). Methods: Thirty-one patients with PMBCL were recruited. After completion of R-ICHT, patients were staged with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography, showing DS 4, and were treated with adjuvant RSRT. The chosen techniques for RT delivery were intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT). Most patients underwent the first one using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). All patients were evaluated every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months afterwards for a period of at least 5 years, with clinical and radiological procedures as required. Results: All patients received RSRT with a dose of 30 Gy in 15 fractions. The median follow-up time of 52.7 months (IQR: 26–64.1 months). The 5-year OS rate was 100%. The 2-year and 5-year PFS rates were 96.7% and 92.5%, respectively. Patients with relapsed disease had been treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT). Conclusion: RSRT in patients with PMBCL treated with ICHT and DS 4 did not impact unfavorably on patient survival

Residual Site Radiotherapy After Immunochemotherapy in Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma: A Monoinstitutional Retrospective Study

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of residual site radiation therapy (RSRT) on local control (LC), progressionfree (PFS) and overall (OS) survival in patients with primary mediastinal lymphoma (PMBCL), following rituximab and chemotherapy treatment (ICHT). Patients and Methods: The study included 34 patients with PMBCL treated between 2006 and 2014 with ICHT with/without autologous stem cell transplantation and RSRT. Between the end of ICHT/stem cell transplantation and RSRT, patients were evaluated with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography. The gross tumor volume included morphological mediastinal residual disease after ICHT/SCT. The percentage of LC, PFS and OS were assessed. Results: All patients received RSRT with a median dose of 30 Gy. Median follow-up was 82 months. One patient out of 34 (3%) showed progressive disease 9 months from diagnosis. The 10-year PFS and OS were 97% and 97% respectively. Conclusion: RSRT in patients with PMBCL treated with ICHT did not impact unfavorably on LC and patient survival

Beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2: deleterious variants in DNA repair pathway genes in italian families with breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancers

The 5-10% of breast/ovarian cancers (BC and OC) are inherited, and germline pathogenic (P) variants in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 explain only 10-20% of these cases. Currently, new DDR genes have been related to BC/OC and to pancreatic (PC) cancers, but the prevalence of P variants remains to be explored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the spectrum and the prevalence of pathogenic variants in DDR pathway genes other than BRCA1/2 and to correlate the genotype with the clinical phenotype. A cohort of 113 non-BRCA patients was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using a multigene panel of the 25 DDR pathways genes related to BC, OC, and PC. We found 43 unique variants in 18 of 25 analyzed genes, 14 classified as P/likely pathogenic (LP) and 28 as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Deleterious variants were identified in 14% of index cases, whereas a VUS was identified in 20% of the probands. We observed a high incidence of deleterious variants in the CHEK2 gene, and a new pathogenic variant was detected in the RECQL gene. These results supported the clinical utility of multigene panel to increase the detection of P/LP carriers and to identify new actionable pathogenic gene variants useful for preventive and therapeutic approaches

AIRO Breast Cancer Group Best Clinical Practice 2022 Update

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common tumor in women and represents the leading cause of cancer death. Radiation therapy plays a key-role in the treatment of all breast cancer stages. Therefore, the adoption of evidence-based treatments is warranted, to ensure equity of access and standardization of care in clinical practice.Method: This national document on the highest evidence-based available data was developed and endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group.We analyzed literature data regarding breast radiation therapy, using the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) methodology (www.sign.ac.uk). Updated findings from the literature were examined, including the highest levels of evidence (meta-analyses, randomized trials, and international guidelines) with a significant impact on clinical practice. The document deals with the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer, local relapse, and metastatic disease, with focus on diagnosis, staging, local and systemic therapies, and follow up. Information is given on indications, techniques, total doses, and fractionations.Results: An extensive literature review from 2013 to 2021 was performed. The work was organized according to a general index of different topics and most chapters included individual questions and, when possible, synoptic and summary tables. Indications for radiation therapy in breast cancer were examined and integrated with other oncological treatments. A total of 50 questions were analyzed and answered.Four large areas of interest were investigated: (1) general strategy (multidisciplinary approach, contraindications, preliminary assessments, staging and management of patients with electronic devices); (2) systemic therapy (primary, adjuvant, in metastatic setting); (3) clinical aspects (invasive, non-invasive and micro-invasive carcinoma; particular situations such as young and elderly patients, breast cancer in males and cancer during pregnancy; follow up with possible acute and late toxicities; loco-regional relapse and metastatic disease); (4) technical aspects (radiation after conservative surgery or mastectomy, indications for boost, lymph node radiotherapy and partial breast irradiation).Appendixes about tumor bed boost and breast and lymph nodes contouring were implemented, including a dedicated web application. The scientific work was reviewed and validated by an expert group of breast cancer key-opinion leaders.Conclusions: Optimal breast cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach sharing therapeutic strategies with the other involved specialists and the patient, within a coordinated and dedicated clinical path. In recent years, the high-level quality radiation therapy has shown a significant impact on local control and survival of breast cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to offer and guarantee accurate treatments according to the best standards of evidence-based medicine

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

The aim of our study was to assess the performance value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and in the identification of good vs. poor responders to neoadjuvant therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer underwent MRI prior to and after CRT. T stage and tumor regression grade (TRG) on post-CRT MRI was compared with the pathological staging ypT and TRG. Tumor volume and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) before and after neoadjuvant CRT; the percentage of tumor volume reduction and the change of ADC (ΔADC) was also calculated. ADC parameters and the percentage of tumor volume reduction were correlated to histopathological results. The diagnostic performance of ADC and volume reduction to assess tumor response was evaluated by calculating the area under the ROC curve and the optimal cut-off values. RESULTS: A significant correlation between the T stage and the TRG defined in DW-MRI after CRT and the ypT and the TRG observed on the surgical specimens was found (p = 0.001; p < 0.001). The mean post-CRT ADC and ΔADC in responder patients was significantly higher compared to non-responder ones (p = 0.001; p = 0.01). Furthermore, the mean post-CRT ADC values were significantly higher in tumors with T-downstage (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: DW-MRI may have a significant role in the restaging and in the evaluation of post-CRT response of locally advanced rectal cancer. Quantitative analysis of DWI through ADC map may result in a promising noninvasive tool to evaluate the response to therapy. KEYWORDS: Apparent diffusion coefficient; Chemoradiotherapy; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; TR

The Role of Indocyanine Green in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer Previously Treated With Chemo-radiotherapy. A Single-center Retrospective Analysis

Aim: Anastomotic leakage represents the most fearful complication in colorectal surgery. Important risk factors for leakage are low anastomoses and preoperative radiotherapy. Many surgeons often unnecessarily perform a protective ileostomy, increasing costs and necessitating a second operation for recanalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of indocyanine green in assessing bowel perfusion, even in cases of a low anastomosis on tissue treated with radiotherapy. Patients and methods: Two groups of patients were selected: Group A (risky group) with only low extraperitoneal rectal tumors (&lt;8 cm) previously treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy; group B (no risk group) with only intraperitoneal rectal tumors (&gt;8 cm), not previously treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical postoperative outcome, morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage were compared between these two groups. Results: In group A, comprised of 35 patients, the overall complication rate was 8.6%, with two patients developing anastomotic leakage (5.7%). In group B, comprised of 53 patients, the overall complication rate was 17% with four cases with anastomotic leakage (7.5%). No statistical difference was observed for conversion rate, general complications, or anastomotic leakage. No statistical differences were observed in clinical variables except for American Society of Anesthesiologist score (p=0.04). Patients who developed complications during radiotherapy had no significant differences in postoperative outcomes compared with other patients. Conclusion: Indocyanine green appears to be safe and effective in assessing the perfusion of colorectal anastomoses, even in the highest-risk cases, potentially reducing the rate of ileostomy. The main limitation remains the lack of a universally replicable standard assessment

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (HFRT) of Breast/Chest Wall and Regional Nodes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Toxicity Profile and Survival Outcomes in Retrospective Monoistitutional Study

Aim of the study was to evaluate hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) of the breast/chest wall and regional nodes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One hundred and twenty-two patients were treated with HFRT (42.4Gy/16fractions). HFRT showed excellent local control, survival rates and low toxicity profile and may be considered a valid therapeutic option for these patients. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) of the breast/chest wall and regional nodes in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and positive lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: One hundred and t wenty-t wo patients treated between October 2016 and March 2020 with HFRT were retrospectively reviewed. A total dose of 42.4 Gy was delivered to the chest wall and lymph nodes in 16 fractions of 2.65 Gy each, using the IMRT technique. Patients treated with breast-conserving surgery received an overdose (concomitant boost of 3 Gy daily) with the SIB (Simultaneous Integrated Boost) technique. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range 34-86 years) and median follow-up was 22 months (range 6-48 months). Overall survival (OS) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 100%, 97.3% and 90%, respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 2, and 3 years was 91.4%, 87%, and 84.8%, respectively. Distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 1, 2 and 3 years was 93.1%, 88% and 85.7%, respectively. Two patients (1.6%) experienced local recurrence on the chest wall during FUP. Twenty-one patients (17%) showed a grade 2 dermal toxicity, no grade 3 acute skin toxicity was found. Sixteen patients (13%) showed early-stage arm lymphedema (grade ≤2). Twenty-three patients (19%) showed a grade 2 late skin toxicit y. Twent y patients (16%) had grade ≤2 late arm lymphedema. Conclusion: Given the excellent local control, survival rates and the low toxicity profile demonstrated, HFRT could be considered a valid therapeutic option in patients with locally advanced breast cancer

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Inevitable Price to Pay for Survival, or a Preventable Complication?

Background: Rectal cancer is frequent and often treated with sphincter-saving procedures that may cause LARS, a syndrome characterized by symptoms of bowel disfunction that may severely affect quality of life. LARS is common, but its pathogenesis is mostly unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of LARS and to identify potential risk factors. Methods: We performed an observational retrospective single center analysis. The following data were collected and analyzed for each patient: demographics, tumor-related data, and intra- and peri-operative data. Statistical analysis was conducted, including descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors. Results: Total LARS incidence was 31%. Statistically significant differences were found in tumor distance from anal verge, tumor extension (pT and diameter) and tumor grading (G). Multivariate analysis identified tumor distance from anal verge and tumor extension as an independent predictive factor for both major and total LARS. Adjuvant therapy, although not significant at univariate analysis, was identified as an independent predictive factor. Time to stoma closure within 10 weeks seems to reduce incidence of major LARS. Conclusions:bold LARS affects a considerable portion of patients. This study identified potential predictive factors that could be useful to identify high risk patients for LARS