Net Promoter Score: a prospective, single-centre observational study assessing if a single question determined treatment success after primary or revision hip arthroplasty

Abstract Background Our study aimed to identify the relationship between treatment outcome assessed by patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and satisfaction measured by calculation of the Net Promoter Score (NPS), which identifies promoters, following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim was to evaluate this association separately in primary and revision THA and to determine thresholds based on PROMs that identify detractors of the surgical procedure or the centre. Methods A total of 1,243 patients who underwent primary or revision THA at our hospital were asked to complete questionnaires of the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Euroquol-5D (EQ-5D) and information on pain intensity preoperatively, three and 12 months after surgery. Postoperatively, the patients were additionally asked about their satisfaction with the procedure and the hospital by using three different NPS questions. The association between PROMs and NPS was evaluated based on group comparisons of primary or revision THA and receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC) to determine threshold values. Results At 12 months the NPS of all three questions were invariably linked to treatment outcome in patients after primary THA and patients with a single revision. In these two treatment groups, promoters always showed significantly better PROM scores than detractors. The NPS score was always higher in the primary group in comparison to the single revision group, e.g. 66.4% would undergo the procedure again in the first group, while only 33.0% would opt for this in the latter group. The high thresholds for the PROMs at 12 months, that were calculated by ROC analysis to identify promoter/detractors, indicate that patients` satisfaction required very good joint function and pain relief. However, the NPS was not a suitable tool to identify patients who need further care in an early phase after surgery. Conclusions With NPS already a single question or a single parameter provides the desired information regarding patient satisfaction and also treatment success. Trial registration The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Medical Faculty of the University Rostock: “Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Rostock”, Address: St.-Georg Str. 108 18055 Rostock, Germany, reference number: A2015–0055

Intraoperative damage to surgical gloves during various operations on the musculoskeletal system: a multicenter study

Introduction!#!Various orthopedic surgical procedures cause mechanical stress for gloves. In some cases, sharp-edged objects impact on the glove surfaces. The systematic description of lesions is still missing.!##!Methods!#!2289 gloves from 409 surgeries [primary hip and knee arthroplasties (PA), revisions arthroplasties (RA) and arthroscopic shoulder, hip and knee surgery (AY)] from 3 clinics were examined for lesions using water tightening test according to the European norm EN 455-1.!##!Results!#!Arthroscopies showed the lowest rate of operations with damaged gloves (6.9%). Depending on clinic, 32.7% and 59.2% of PA surgeries generated damaged gloves, while in RA, these numbers rose to 76.0% and 72.8%, respectively. In PA and RA, the most affected finger was the index finger, whereas in arthroscopies, more damage occurred on the middle finger and the thumb. The size of the lesions was rather small with the vast majority being 1 mm or 2 mm in size.!##!Conclusion!#!All investigated interventions led to glove lesions. With increasing mechanical stress, the number of glove defects increased. EN 455 does not account for the intraoperative tear risk. Stricter requirements for gloves should be introduced. Glove change intervals should be defined and implemented, and new materials should be developed

The effect of the design of the orthosis on the axial load transmission of two flexion abduction orthoses used in treating congenital hip dysplasia

Background: With an incidence of 2–4% in all newborns, developmental dysplasia of the hip, DDH, represents the most frequent congenital disorder of the skeletal system in Germany. The therapy options are deduced with the help of a sonography. The conservative therapy approach includes the application of flexion abduction orthoses, which lead to a development of the child’s hip through abduction and flexion angle. The overall structure of the orthoses puts a strain on the axial skeleton of the children. The following work is intended to clarify what role the design of the orthoses plays in this respect. Methods: Inclusion criterion for the study was fully developed newborns without an indication of skeletal malformations with Type I hip joints according to Graf verified by ultrasound. A total of 19 newborns were recruited and included in the period 3/2013–01/2015. Two types of orthoses used in treating developmental dysplasia of the hip (Tübinger splint, Otto Bock; hip flexion abduction orthosis (Superior orthosis) according to Mittelmeier-Graf, AIDAMED e.K (Kreuz et al., 2012; Mittelmeier et al., 1998; Schmitz et al., 1999), constructions differ, were used. Force was measured with the help of three force sensors, which were even able to be integrated into these without changing the design of the orthosis. In this closed system, force transmission was measured for the duration of a fixed period of two minutes. Findings: The greatest axial force development (overall force) is in the Tübinger splint with an average force of 15.1 N (min. 0.59 N, max. 53.09 N, mean 15.1, SD 2.46). 4.09 N (min. 0.96 N, max. 20.99 N, mean 4.09, SD 0.65) resulted in the Superior orthosis. Significant correlations between body weight and resulting axial traction – on average during the entire measurement period and in movement – can be taken from the statistical analysis regarding the Tübinger splint. Such a correlation cannot be depicted for the Superior orthosis. Interpretation: The analysis of the load transmission of the examined flexion and abduction orthoses reveals differences between the models. The construct of the orthoses in itself appears to play a significant role. Long-term effects of orthosis therapy on a child’s axial skeleton have not been studied to date. Furthermore, it seems reasonable to expand the test series to orthoses, the design of which is configured in a similar matter compared to the examined aids. Conclusion: This study proves that the orthotic design has an influence on the infant’s axial load

Evaluation of the standard procedure for treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of total knee and hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the 2015 and 2020 census in total joint replacement centres in Germany

Background!#!There are different procedures for both, the diagnosis and the therapy of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), however, national or international guidelines for a standardised treatment regime are still lacking. The present paper evaluates the use of the predominant treatment protocols for PJI in certified total joint replacement centres (EPZ) in Germany based on an EndoCert questionnaire.!##!Materials and methods!#!The questionnaire was developed in cooperation with the EndoCert Certification Commission to survey the treatment protocols for septic revision arthroplasties in EPZ. Questions targeted the various treatment options including prosthesis preserving procedures (DAIR - Debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention of the prosthesis), one-stage revision, two-stage revision, removal of the endoprosthesis and diagnostic sampling prior to re-implantation. All certified EPZ participated (n = 504) and the results from the current survey in 2020 were compared to data from a previous analysis in 2015.!##!Results!#!The number of centres that performed DAIR up to a maximum of 4 weeks and more than 10 weeks after index surgery decreased since 2015, while the number of centres that provided a one-stage revision as a treatment option increased (hip: + 6.3%; knee: + 6.6%). The majority of the centres (73.2%) indicated a 4-8 week period as the preferred interval between prosthesis removal and re-implantation in two-stage revision in hip as well as knee revisions. Centres with a higher number of revision surgeries (> 200 revisions/year), opted even more often for the 4-8 week period (92.3%). In two-stage revision the use of metal-based spacers with/without reinforcement with antibiotic-containing cement as an interim placeholder was significantly reduced in 2020 compared to 2015. There was also a clear preference for cemented anchoring in two-stage revision arthroplasty in the knee in 2020, whereas the majority of hip replacements was cementless. Additionally, in 2020 the number of samples for microbiological testing during the removal of the infected endoprosthesis increased and 72% of the centres took five or more samples. Overall, the number of EPZ with a standardised protocol for the procedure expanded from 2015 to 2020.!##!Conclusion!#!While there was a trend towards standardised therapeutic algorithms for PJI with more uniform choices among the centres in 2020 compared to 2015, the treatment often remains an individual decision. However, since a consistent treatment regime is of vital importance with an expected rise of total numbers of revision arthroplasties, uniform definitions with regard to comparability and standardisation are necessary for the further development of the EndoCert system

Evaluation of the standard procedure for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in Germany - results of a survey within the EndoCert initiative

Background!#!The periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication in the field of arthroplasty. Despite the rising number of primary joint replacements, no unified therapeutic standard has been established for the treatment of PJI yet.!##!Methods!#!A survey on the principles of treatment of PJI in Germany was conducted. A total of 515 EndoProthetikZentren (EPZ) were included, resulting in a response rate of 100%.!##!Results!#!For early infections 97.6% of the centers use prosthesis-preserving procedures (DAIR). A one-stage exchange was implemented by less than 50% of the centers. If implemented, this treatment entails a prior selection of patients for a successful treatment. The two-stage exchange is performed in all centers, and most centers proceed with the implantation of a cemented spacer between stages. 75% of the centers proceed with a center-based concept for the treatment of PJI.!##!Conclusion!#!The aim of a uniform PJI standard at the centers has not yet been fully achieved. Further improvements within the certification were initiated. The most relevant treatment options in Germany are displayed. The two-stage revision with a cemented spacer is the most widely implemented treatment. This exposition of principles could help for the further development of standardized treatment guidelines and definitions