Challenge and Outcome for the Prostate Squamous Cell Carcinoma Which Developed 8 Years after Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Approached by a Combined Multimodal Treatment with High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, and Chemotherapy

Prostate squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) rarely develops as a secondary cancer after treatment with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). There is no established effective treatment for the disease condition. Herein, we present a 78-year-old man who developed pSCC 8 years after LDR-BT. He was subsequently selected to receive a combined multimodal treatment with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT), external beam radiation therapy, and chemotherapy for his pSCC. Eleven months later, he displayed no biochemical failure nor clinical radiographic recurrence. However, MRI detected a newly developed prostatic-rectal fistula (grade 4), and a colostomy was performed to relieve pain and inflammation. To our knowledge, this is the first report to perform a combined multimodal treatment with HDR-ISBT for pSCC suspected as a secondary cancer due to LDR-BT

Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: Recommendations of a delphi consensus from the focal therapy society

BACKGROUND: Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localized PCa. METHODS: A 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, 1) the current/present role; 2) the potential/future role; 3) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold. RESULTS: Of 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (N.=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (N.=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (N.=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (N.=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localized PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority. CONCLUSIONS: The present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject

Thermal/ablative technology

Academi