Items and dimensions for the construction of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test to measure fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives Development of an item pool to construct a future computerized adaptive test (CAT) for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The item pool was based on the patients' perspective and examined for face and content validity previously. This study assessed the fit of the items with seven predefined dimensions and examined the item pool's dimensionality structure in statistical terms. Study Design and Setting A total of 551 patients with RA participated in this study. Several steps were conducted to come from an explorative item pool to a psychometrically sound item bank. The item response theory (IRT) analysis using the generalized partial credit model was conducted for each of the seven predefined dimensions. Poorly fitting items were removed. Finally, the best possible multidimensional IRT (MIRT) model for the data was identified. Results In IRT analysis, 49 items showed insufficient item characteristics. Items with a discriminative ability below 0.60 and/or model misfit effect sizes greater than 0.10 were removed. Factor analysis on the 196 remaining items revealed three dimensions, namely severity, impact, and variability of fatigue. The dimensions were further confirmed in MIRT model analysis. Conclusion This study provided an initially calibrated item bank and showed which dimensions and items can be used for the development of a multidimensional CAT for fatigue in R

Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Effective Consumer Scale (EC-17)

PURPOSE: The Effective Consumer Scale (EC-17) measures the skills of musculoskeletal patients in managing their own healthcare. The objectives of this study were to translate the EC-17 into Dutch and to further evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS: The EC-17 was translated and cognitively pretested following cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Two hundred and thirty-eight outpatients (52 % response rate) with osteoarthritis or fibromyalgia completed the EC-17 along with other validated measures. Three weeks later, 101 patients completed the EC-17 again. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the scale. The items adequately fit the Rasch model and only one item demonstrated differential item functioning. Person reliability was high (0.92), but item difficulty levels tended to cluster around the middle of the scale, and measurement precision was highest for moderate and lower levels of skills. The scale demonstrated adequate test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.71), and correlations with other measures were largely as expected. CONCLUSION: The results supported the validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the EC-17, but suggest that the scale is best targeted at patients with relatively low levels of skills. Future studies should further examine its sensitivity to change in a clinical trial specifically aimed at improving effective consumer skills

Items and dimensions for the construction of a multidimensional computerized adaptive test to measure fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives Development of an item pool to construct a future computerized adaptive test (CAT) for fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The item pool was based on the patients' perspective and examined for face and content validity previously. This study assessed the fit of the items with seven predefined dimensions and examined the item pool's dimensionality structure in statistical terms. Study Design and Setting A total of 551 patients with RA participated in this study. Several steps were conducted to come from an explorative item pool to a psychometrically sound item bank. The item response theory (IRT) analysis using the generalized partial credit model was conducted for each of the seven predefined dimensions. Poorly fitting items were removed. Finally, the best possible multidimensional IRT (MIRT) model for the data was identified. Results In IRT analysis, 49 items showed insufficient item characteristics. Items with a discriminative ability below 0.60 and/or model misfit effect sizes greater than 0.10 were removed. Factor analysis on the 196 remaining items revealed three dimensions, namely severity, impact, and variability of fatigue. The dimensions were further confirmed in MIRT model analysis. Conclusion This study provided an initially calibrated item bank and showed which dimensions and items can be used for the development of a multidimensional CAT for fatigue in R

Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Objective\ud To examine the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).\ud \ud Methods\ud A cross-sectional sample of 224 outpatients with OA completed a survey containing the Dutch PEPPI-5 and other standardized measures assessing perceived health-management skills, general self-efficacy, social support, and health-related quality of life. A subsample of 100 patients completed the PEPPI-5 again approximately 3 weeks later.\ud \ud Results\ud Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for a unidimensional model of the PEPPI-5. Additionally, the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). As hypothesized, the PEPPI-5 was strongly correlated with perceived health-management skills, moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health, and not with physical aspects of health. Contrary to expectations, however, it was not correlated with general self-efficacy.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud The Dutch PEPPI-5 demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in patients with OA\u

Sulfasalazine in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

Objective. To assess the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the treatment of juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). Methods. We conducted a 24-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double- blind, multicenter study of patients with active JCA of both oligoarticular and polyarticular onset. Patients were treated with a dosage of 50 mg/kg/day of SSZ (maximum 2,000 mg/day) or placebo. The efficacy variables were joint scores, physician's, parents', and patient's overall assessments, and laboratory parameters of inflammation. Results. Of the 69 patients enrolled, 52 (75%) completed the trial. Six patients (18%) withdrew from the placebo group, and 11 (31%) withdrew from the SSZ group (P = 0.18). In the intention- to-treat analysis of end point efficacy, between-group differences were significant for the overall articular severity score (P = 0.02), all global assessments (P = 0.01), and the laboratory parameters (P < 0.001). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the SSZ group and were the main reason for withdrawal (P < 0.001), but in all instances, these events were transient or reversible upon cessation of treatment. Conclusion. The results of this first placebo-controlled study show that SSZ is effective and safe in the treatment of children with oligoarticular- and polyarticular-onset JCA, although it was not well tolerated in one-third of the patients