Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption

__Abstract__ The long-standing discussion on decoupling has recently moved from adopters not implementing the agreed-upon policies to compliant adopters not achieving the goals intended by institutional entrepreneurs. This “means-ends decoupling” prevails especially in highly opaque fields, where practices, causality, and performance are hard to understand and chart. I conceptualize the conditions under which the adoption of institutions in relatively opaque fields leads to the achievement of the envisaged goals. Voluntary sustainability standards governing socioenvironmental issues illustrate these arguments. I argue that the lack of field transparency drives institutional entrepreneurs to create and maintain concrete and uniform rules, apply strong incentives, and disseminate “best practices” to ensure substantive adopter compliance. However, such rigid institutions are ill-equipped to deal with the causal complexity and practice multiplicity underlying opacity while they smother adopter agency. The ensuing tension between substantive compliance and goal achievement leads to an inherent trade-off: institutional entrepreneurs who remedy the policy-practice decoupling may enhance the disparity between means and ends, and vice versa. While sustainability standards and other institutions in highly opaque fields can, therefore, not fully achieve the envisaged goals, the trade-off can be reduced through systemically designed institutions that promote goal internalization and contain niche institutions

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients with a high H2FPEF-score: Insights from the Amsterdam UMC PAH-cohort

Background: The idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH) phenotype is changing from a predominantly young female patient to an older, frequently obese patient of either sex. Many newly diagnosed iPAH-patients have risk factors for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), possibly affecting management and treatment. Aim: To determine whether the H2FPEF-score identifies a subgroup of iPAH-patients with blunted response to PAH-targeted treatment. Study design and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 253 treatment-naïve iPAH-patients (1989-2019) with a confirmed diagnosis after right heart catheterization by a multidisciplinary team. Follow-up RHC measurements were available in 150 iPAH-patients. iPAH-patients were stratified by the H2FPEF-score; a score ≥5 identified a higher possibility of (concealed) LVDD. Results: The presence of a high H2FPEF-score in incident iPAH-patients rose 30% in thirty years. Patients with a H2FPEF-score ≥5 were older, more often male and/or obese, and had more comorbidities than patients with a H2FPEF-score ≤1. A high H2FPEF-score was associated with worse survival and poor functional capacity. Right ventricular function was equally depressed among iPAH-groups. Imaging and invasive hemodynamic measurements suggested concealed LVDD in iPAH patients with a high H2FPEF-score. At follow-up, hemodynamic and functional responses were similar in iPAH-patients with a high or low H2FPEF-score. Conclusions: While a high H2FPEF-score in iPAH is associated with a worse prognosis and signs of LVDD, hemodynamic and functional responses to PAH treatment are not predicted by the H2FPEF-score

Validation of the 2016 ase/eacvi guideline for diastolic dysfunction in patients with unexplained dyspnea and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is considered the cornerstone of the diagnostic workup of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Thus far, validation of the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) echo-algorithm for evaluation of diastolic (dys)function in a patient suspected of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has been limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm was assessed in 204 patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea or pulmonary hypertension with echocardiogram and right heart catheterization. Invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was used as the gold standard. In addition, the diagnostic performance of H2 FPEF score and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) were evaluated. There was a poor correlation between indexed left atrial volume, E/e′ (septal and average) or early mitral inflow (E), and PCWP (r=0.25–0.30, P values all <0.01). No correlation was found in our cohort between e′ (septal or lateral) or tricuspid valve regurgitation and PCWP. The correlation between diastolic function grades of the ASE/EACVI algorithm and PCWP was poor (r=0.17, P<0.05). The ASE/EACVI algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 35% and 87%, respectively; an accuracy of 67% and an area under the curve of 0.56. Moreover, in 30% of cases the algorithm was not applicable or indeterminate. H2 FPEF score had a modest correlation with PCWP (r=0.44, P<0.0001), and accuracy was 73%; NT-proBNP correlated weakly with PCWP (r=0.24, P<0.001), and accuracy was 57%. CONCLUSIONS: The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm for the assessment of diastolic function has a limited diagnostic accuracy in patients evaluated for unexplained dyspnea and/or pulmonary hypertension, and especially sensitivity to detect diastolic dysfunction was low

Hemodynamic Effects of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Specific Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and With Combined Post- and Precapillay Pulmonary Hypertension

Background: Drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension have been considered for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (Cpc-PH). We aimed to study changes in cardiac volumes, cardiac load and left ventricular (LV) filling pressures in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and Cpc-PH in response to pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific treatment. Methods and Results: In this prospective study, 23 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and Cpc-PH underwent right-heart catheterization, including acute provocation testing (fluid loading and inhaled nitric oxide) and cardiac MRI at baseline. Right-heart catheterization and cardiac MRI were repeated after 4 months of treatment. At baseline, acutely increasing preload by fluid loading resulted in a significant increase in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), whereas reducing right ventricular (RV) afterload and increasing LV distensability by acute administration of inhaled nitric oxide had no effect on PAWP. After 4 months of treatment, we observed a significant reduction in RV and LV afterload and increased RV and LV stroke volume, but PAWP significantly increased. Conclusions: In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and Cpc-PH, 4 months of pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific treatment increased RV and LV stroke volume at the expense of increased PAWP. This increase in PAWP was similarly observed acutely after fluid loading

The Value of Passive Leg Raise During Right Heart Catheterization in Diagnosing Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background: Because of limited accuracy of noninvasive tests, diastolic stress testing plays an important role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Exercise right heart catheterization is considered the gold standard and indicated when HFpEF is suspected but left ventricular filling pressures at rest are normal. However, performing exercise during right heart catheterization is not universally available. Here, we examined whether pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during a passive leg raise (PLR) could be used as simple and accurate method to diagnose or rule out occult-HFpEF. Methods: In our tertiary center for pulmonary hypertension and HFpEF, all patients who received a diagnostic right heart catheterization with PCWP-measurements at rest, PLR, and exercise were evaluated (2014-2020). The diagnostic value of PCWP PLRwas compared with the gold standard (PCWP EXERCISE). Cut-offs derived from our cohort were subsequently validated in an external cohort (N=74). Results: Thirty-nine non-HFpEF, 33 occult-HFpEF, and 37 manifest-HFpEF patients were included (N=109). In patients with normal PCWP REST(<15 mmHg), PCWP PLRsignificantly improved diagnostic accuracy compared with PCWP REST(AUC=0.82 versus 0.69, P=0.03). PCWP PLR≥19 mmHg (24% of cases) had a specificity of 100% for diagnosing occult-HFpEF, irrespective of diuretic use. PCWP PLR≥11 mmHg had a 100% sensitivity and negative predictive value for diagnosing occult-HFpEF. Both cut-offs retained a 100% specificity and 100% sensitivity in the external cohort. Absolute change in PCWP PLRor V-wave derived parameters had no incremental value in diagnosing occult-HFpEF. Conclusions: PCWP PLRis a simple and powerful tool that can help to diagnose or rule out occult-HFpEF

Trimetazidine in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a randomized controlled cross‐over trial

Abstract Aims Impaired myocardial energy homeostasis plays an import role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Left ventricular relaxation has a high energy demand, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction has been related to impaired energy homeostasis. This study investigated whether trimetazidine, a fatty acid oxidation inhibitor, could improve myocardial energy homeostasis and consequently improve exercise haemodynamics in patients with HFpEF. Methods and results The DoPING‐HFpEF trial was a phase II single‐centre, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized cross‐over trial. Patients were randomized to trimetazidine treatment or placebo for 3 months and switched after a 2‐week wash‐out period. The primary endpoint was change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, measured with right heart catheterization at multiple stages of bicycling exercise. Secondary endpoint was change in myocardial phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate, an index of the myocardial energy status, measured with phosphorus‐31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The study included 25 patients (10/15 males/females; mean (standard deviation) age, 66 (10) years; body mass index, 29.8 (4.5) kg/m2); with the diagnosis of HFpEF confirmed with (exercise) right heart catheterization either before or during the trial. There was no effect of trimetazidine on the primary outcome pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at multiple levels of exercise (mean change 0 [95% confidence interval, 95% CI −2, 2] mmHg over multiple levels of exercise, P = 0.60). Myocardial phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate in the trimetazidine arm was similar to placebo (1.08 [0.76, 1.76] vs. 1.30 [0.95, 1.86], P = 0.08). There was no change by trimetazidine compared with placebo in the exploratory parameters: 6‐min walking distance (mean change of −6 [95% CI −18, 7] m vs. −5 [95% CI −22, 22] m, respectively, P = 0.93), N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (5 (−156, 166) ng/L vs. −13 (−172, 147) ng/L, P = 0.70), overall quality‐of‐life (KCCQ and EQ‐5D‐5L, P = 0.78 and P = 0.51, respectively), parameters for diastolic function measured with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, or metabolic parameters. Conclusions Trimetazidine did not improve myocardial energy homeostasis and did not improve exercise haemodynamics in patients with HFpEF