Objectively diagnosing rumination syndrome in children using esophageal pH-impedance and manometry

This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving'. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.Background Rumination syndrome is characterized by recurrent regurgitation of recently ingested food into the mouth. Differentiation with other diagnoses and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in particular, is difficult. Recently, objective pH‐impedance (pH‐MII) and manometry criteria were proposed for adults. The aim of this study was to determine diagnostic ambulatory pH‐MII and manometry criteria for rumination syndrome in children. Methods Clinical data and 24‐hour pH‐MII and manometry recordings of children with a clinical suspicion of rumination syndrome were reviewed. Recordings were analyzed for retrograde bolus flow extending into the proximal esophagus. Peak gastric and intraesophageal pressures closely related to these events were recorded and checked for a pattern compatible with rumination. Events were classified into primary, secondary, and supragastric belch–associated rumination. Key Results Twenty‐five consecutive patients (11 males, median age 13.3 years [IQR 5.9‐15.8]) were included; recordings of 18 patients were suitable for analysis. Rumination events were identified in 16/18 patients, with 50% of events occurring 30 mmHg, while only 50% of all events was characterized by peaks >30 mmHg and an additional 20% by peaks >25 mmHg. Four patients had evidence of acid GERD, all showing secondary rumination. Conclusions and Inferences Combined 24‐hour pH‐MII and manometry can be used to diagnose rumination syndrome in children and to distinguish it from GERD. Rumination patterns in children are similar compared with adults, albeit with lower gastric pressure increase. We propose a diagnostic cutoff for gastric pressure increase >25 mmHg associated with retrograde bolus flow into the proximal esophagus

Лексична лакуна як об'єкт лінгвістичних досліджень

В статье осуществлен теоретический обзор проблемы лакунарности, как одного из основных вопросов при реконструкции языковой картины мира. Представлена классификация лексических лакун на материале сопоставления украинского, русского и английского языка.В статті зроблено теоретичний огляд проблеми лакунарності як одного з основних питань при реконструкції мовної картини світу. Представлена класифікація лексичних лакун на матеріалі зіставлення української, російської та англійської мови.This paper is a theoretical review on lacunarity as one of the main problems in reconstruction of the linguistic picture of the world. A classification of lexical lacunae has been suggested using the material of comparison of the Ukrainian, Russian and English languages

Intra- and interrater reliability of the Chicago Classification of achalasia subtypes in pediatric High Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HRM) recordings

This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving'. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. This author accepted manuscript is made available following 12 month embargo from date of publication (June 2017) in accordance with the publisher’s archiving policyBackground Subtyping achalasia by high‐resolution manometry (HRM) is clinically relevant as response to therapy and prognosis have shown to vary accordingly. The aim of this study was to assess inter‐ and intrarater reliability of diagnosing achalasia and achalasia subtyping in children using the Chicago Classification (CC) V3.0. Methods Six observers analyzed 40 pediatric HRM recordings (22 achalasia and 18 non‐achalasia) twice by using dedicated analysis software (ManoView 3.0, Given Imaging, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Integrated relaxation pressure (IRP4s), distal contractile integral (DCI), intrabolus pressurization pattern (IBP), and distal latency (DL) were extracted and analyzed hierarchically. Cohen's κ (2 raters) and Fleiss’ κ (>2 raters) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for categorical and ordinal data, respectively. Results Based on the results of dedicated analysis software only, intra‐ and interrater reliability was excellent and moderate (κ=0.89 and κ=0.52, respectively) for differentiating achalasia from non‐achalasia. For subtyping achalasia, reliability decreased to substantial and fair (κ=0.72 and κ=0.28, respectively). When observers were allowed to change the software‐driven diagnosis according to their own interpretation of the manometric patterns, intra‐ and interrater reliability increased for diagnosing achalasia (κ=0.98 and κ=0.92, respectively) and for subtyping achalasia (κ=0.79 and κ=0.58, respectively). Conclusions Intra‐ and interrater agreement for diagnosing achalasia when using HRM and the CC was very good to excellent when results of automated analysis software were interpreted by experienced observers. More variability was seen when relying solely on the software‐driven diagnosis and for subtyping achalasia. Therefore, diagnosing and subtyping achalasia should be performed in pediatric motility centers with significant expertise

Duodenal acid clearance in humans: Observations made with intraluminal impedance recording

Duodenal acid clearance appears to be involved not only in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcer disease but also in functional dyspepsia. Duodenal contractile activity can help to maintain neutral pH in the duodenum by mixing acid with bicarbonate or by aborally transporting the acid load. Intraluminal impedance recording, allowing the detection of nonacid liquid boluses, can be carried out concomitantly with antroduodenal manometry and pH recording and may thus provide useful information about the mechanisms involved in duodenal clearance of endogenous acid and volume boluses. Eight H. pylori-negative healthy volunteers were studied with two catheters positioned across the pylorus, allowing the recording of five impedance signals (one antral, one pyloric, and three duodenal) simultaneously with six pressure signals (two antral, one pyloric, and three duodenal) as well as distal antral and proximal duodenal pH. During phase II of the migrating motor complex, which is known to be associated with the highest duodenal acid exposure, each duodenal acidification event (defined as a pH drop > 2 pH units) was characterized by its maximal amplitude, duration, temporal relationship with antroduodenal manometric events, and relation to impedance variations. Acid was considered to have been cleared from the duodenum when the preacidification pH was restored (+/- 0.2 unit). A total of 164 duodenal pH drops were recorded during the 323 min of phase II recordings. Eleven percent of the duodenal acidification events were short-lived (<10 sec). All of these events were temporally associated with a propagated antroduodenal contraction and a short-lived drop in impedance, suggesting rapid aboral passage of the acid bolus. The long-lived duodenal acidification events lasted a mean of 32 sec (range, 25-66 sec). In 90% of these events an antroduodenal propagated contraction was recorded at the time of onset. Repetitive duodenal contractions followed the onset of the long-lived acidification events in 34% of the cases. These remained present until complete clearance of the acid. In 81% of the long-lived acidification events, recovery of the associated impedance drop occurred simultaneously with the pH recovery, suggesting a complete clearance of the bolus. Less frequently (19%), the duodenal pH recovered while the impedance remained low, suggesting that the bolus was not cleared but neutralized. Interdigestive duodenal acidification events usually last about 30 sec. They evoke duodenal contractions in only one-third of cases. Combined pH and impedance recording makes it possible to distinguish between neutralization of acid boluses and their complete total clearance

Interdigestive transpyloric fluid transport assessed by intraluminal impedance recording

Our aim was to explore the use of intraluminal impedance recording for assessment of interdigestive transpyloric fluid movements. Twenty healthy volunteers were studied with a catheter allowing the recording of five antropyloroduodenal impedance signals simultaneously with six pressure signals. Patterns induced by air were verified by standard ultrasound. Transpyloric Doppler ultrasound was used to validate impedance patterns associated with transpyloric fluid transports. Impedance changes caused by air (short-lived increases) occupied 14 +/- 12% of the time in the antrum and 0.8 +/- 0.5% in the duodenum (P 4 s were recorded by both Doppler and impedance techniques. Transpyloric fluid transport was observed in all three phases of the antral migrating motor complex. The total number of transport events was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in phase II (18 +/- 7) than in phases I (2.6 +/- 2) and III (6.1 +/- 3). Retrograde transport was observed mainly in antral phase I (54% of fluid movements, compared with 2.5% in phase II and 18.5% in phase III, P < 0.05). During phase II, 80 +/- 13% of the impedance changes were associated with manometric events and 72 +/- 9% of the antral contractions were associated with transpyloric fluid transport. Prolonged assessment of interdigestive transpyloric fluid transport events using intraluminal measurement of impedance is possible. Manometrically detectable contractions are the most frequent, but not the only, driving forces of these event

Assessment of bolus transit with intraluminal impedance measurement in patients with esophageal motility disorders

BACKGROUND: The clinical management of patients with non-obstructive dysphagia is notoriously difficult. Esophageal impedance measurement can be used to measure esophageal bolus transit without the use of radiation exposure to patients. However, validation of measurement of bolus transit with impedance monitoring has only been performed in healthy subjects with normal motility and not in patients with dysphagia and esophageal motility disorders. The aim was, therefore, to investigate the relationship between transit of swallowed liquid boluses in healthy controls and in patients with dysphagia. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers and 20 patients with dysphagia underwent concurrent impedance measurement and videofluoroscopy. Each subject swallowed five liquid barium boluses. The ability of detecting complete or incomplete bolus transit by means of impedance measurement was assessed, using radiographic bolus transit as the gold standard. KEY RESULTS: Impedance monitoring recognized stasis and transit in 80.5% of the events correctly, with 83.9% of bolus transit being recognized and 77.2% of stasis being recognized correctly. In controls 79.8% of all swallows were scored correctly, whereas in patients 81.3% of all swallows were scored correctly. Depending on the contractility pattern, between 77.0% and 94.3% of the swallows were scored correctly. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Impedance measurement can be used to assess bolus clearance patterns in healthy subjects, but can also be used to reliably assess bolus transit in patients with dysphagia and motility disorders

Rapid drinking challenge during high-resolution manometry is complementary to timed barium esophagogram for diagnosis and follow-up of achalasia

Background: Esophageal stasis is a hallmark of achalasia. Timed barium esophagogram (TBE) is used to measure stasis but exposes patients to ionizing radiation. It is suggested that esophageal stasis can be objectified on high-resolution manometry (HRM) as well using a rapid drinking challenge test (RDC). We aimed to assess esophageal stasis in achalasia by a RDC during HRM and compare this to TBE. Methods: Thirty healthy subjects (15 male, age 40 [IQR 34-49]) and 90 achalasia patients (53 male, age 47 [36-59], 30 untreated/30 treated symptomatic/30 treated asymptomatic) were prospectively included to undergo HRM with RDC and TBE. RDC was performed by drinking 200 mL of water. Response to RDC was measured by basal and relaxation pressure in the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and esophageal pressurization during the last 5 seconds. Key Results: EGJ basal and relaxation pressure during RDC were higher in achalasia compared to healthy subjects (overall P <.01). Esophageal body pressurization was significantly higher in untreated (43 [33-35 mm Hg]) and symptomatic treated patients (25 [16-32] mm Hg) compared to healthy subjects (6 [3-7] mm Hg) and asymptomatic treated patients (11 [8-15] mm Hg, overall P <.01). A strong correlation was observed between esophageal pressurization during RDC and barium column height at 5 minutes on TBE (r =.75, P <.01), comparable to the standard predictor of esophageal stasis, IRP (r =.66, P <.01). Conclusions & Inferences: The RDC can reliably predict esophageal stasis in achalasia and adequately measure treatment response to a degree comparable to TBE. We propose to add this simple test to each HRM study in achalasia patients

Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry

Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is a novel method to assess esophageal motility. Several software and hardware systems are currently available. A set of normal values for HRM parameters was established in the US, using proprietary tactile-sensing catheter technology (Given Imaging). We wished to determine normal values for HRM performed with another type of catheter (Unisensor). Fifty-two healthy volunteers underwent supine HRM. Each subject swallowed 10 liquid water boluses. Esophageal contraction parameters were evaluated and normal values were calculated (defined as 5th and 95th percentile of values). The normal range for the following parameters was calculated; distal contractile integral (mean 1319.44, with a 5-95th percentile range [185.65-3407.60]), contractile front velocity (mean 3.98, 5-95th percentile range [2.40-6.50]), Intrabolus pressure (mean 9.68, range [1.00-19.00]), contraction amplitude measured 5 cm above the esophagogastric junction (EGJ; mean 78.76, range [23.00-146.00]), contraction amplitude 15 cm above the EGJ (mean 43.66, range [3.60-96.00]), transition zone (TZ) length (mean 1.34, range [0.00-5.63]), upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressure (mean 81.63, range [19.50-165.10]), EGJ length (mean 2.97, range [2.17-4.00]), EGJ resting pressure (mean 29.35, range [8.95-51.40]), EGJ relaxation pressure (mean 16.79, range [1.00-39.35]), IRPs4 (mean 13.42, range [2.59-28.28]), and gastric pressure (mean 5.06, range [0.00-9.46]). Overall, the normal values of esophageal HRM parameters obtained with the Unisensor catheter resemble those of the previously published series. Marked differences in upper limits of normal were found for parameters related to the esophageal sphincters and TZ length. Users of HRM should be aware of these differences and define pathology based on comparison to appropriate normal value