Quality of life changes over time and predictors in a large head and neck patients' cohort: secondary analysis from an Italian multi-center longitudinal, prospective, observational study-a study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) head and neck working group

Purpose: The present study examined the longitudinal trajectories, through hierarchical modeling, of quality of life among patients with head and neck cancer, specifically symptoms burden, during radiotherapy, and in the follow-up period (1, 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of radiotherapy), through the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck questionnaire, formed by three factors. Furthermore, analyses were conducted controlling for socio-demographic as well as clinical characteristics. Methods: Multi-level mixed-effects linear regression was used to estimate the association between quality of life and time, age, gender, household, educational level, employment status, ECOG performance status, human papilloma virus (HPV) status, surgery, chemotherapy, alcohol intake, and smoking. Results: Among the 166 participants, time resulted to be a predictor of all the three questionnaire factors, namely, general and specific related symptoms and interference with daily life. Moreover, regarding symptom interference with daily activities factor, HPV-positive status played a significant role. Considering only HPV-negative patients, only time predicted patients' quality of life. Differently, among HPV-positive patients, other variables, such as gender, educational level, alcohol use, surgery, age at diagnosis, employment status, and ECOG status, resulted significant. Conclusion: It was evident that quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer declined during RT, whereas it slowly improved after ending treatment. Our results clarified the role of some socio-demographic and clinical variables, for instance, HPV, which would allow to develop treatments tailored to each patient

Feasibility and safety of extended pleurectomy/decortication for malignant pleural mesothelioma. A single group experience

Surgery is part of a multimodal therapeutic approach to malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) although its real beneficial effect is still controversial. The optimal precise sequence of treatments within the trimodality is unclear, and should be decided upon a multidisciplinary consensus for each individual patient. Here, we analyzed the perioperative data of 19 MPM patients who underwent extended pleurectomy/decortication (EPD) with curative intent. The mean age at diagnosis was 67 years; 11 males and eight females. Ten patients were diagnosed with MPM via medical thoracoscopy (MT), and nine via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The vast majority of cases harbored epitheliod forms. We compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) followed by surgery (11 cases) versus surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT, 8 cases) within a 3-year period. All patients had extended pleurectomy/decortication and none had an extended pneumonectomy. Analysis of survival curves suggested that the short-term outcomes are better with upfront EDP followed by ACT if compared to EDP preceded by NCT. Although limited, the data highlighted the safety and feasibility of EPD, with manageable postoperative complications and no major burden for the patients

M. D. Anderson symptom inventory head neck (MDASI-HN) questionnaire: Italian language psychometric validation in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy ± systemic therapy - A study of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

Purpose: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are likely to develop severe side effects, which may persist long after the end of treatment and may be responsible for decrease patient’s quality of life. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory- Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN) is a questionnaire developed to detect patient’s symptom burden. To conduct an Italian language psychometric validation of MDASI-HN among Italian HNC patients on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Head and Neck Working Group. Method and materials: To assess construct validity, it was performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with both a five-factor solution and three-factor solution, which were compared by a chi-square difference test. The concurrent validity was evaluated by the correlation with EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN35, and it was also assessed known-group validity. The internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Results: In total 166 patients (71.7% male) were included in the study, most of patients (56.2%) had an oropharynx cancer and received definitive chemoradiotherapy (51.2%). The chi-square difference test was sig-nificant and indicated that the five-factor solution fits the data better than the other one. Regarding CFA, all items had a significant saturation with their respective factors; besides, significant and strong correlations were found among factors. Most of the correlations between MDASI-HN factors and EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN35 were significant. It was found a good internal consistency. Conclusion: The MDASI-HN is a valid, short, and easy patient-reported outcome questionnaire which would be useful and efficient in clinical settin

Preliminary report on harmonization of features extraction process using the ComBat tool in the multi-center "Blue Sky Radiomics" study on stage III unresectable NSCLC

Background and purpose: In the retrospective-prospective multi-center "Blue Sky Radiomics" study (NCT04364776), we plan to test a pre-defined radiomic signature in a series of stage III unresectable NSCLC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy and maintenance immunotherapy. As a necessary preliminary step, we explore the influence of different image-acquisition parameters on radiomic features' reproducibility and apply methods for harmonization.Material and methods: We identified the primary lung tumor on two computed tomography (CT) series for each patient, acquired before and after chemoradiation with i.v. contrast medium and with different scanners. Tumor segmentation was performed by two oncological imaging specialists (thoracic radiologist and radio-oncologist) using the Oncentra Masterplan (R) software. We extracted 42 radiomic features from the specific ROls (LIFEx). To assess the impact of different acquisition parameters on features extraction, we used the Combat tool with nonparametric adjustment and the longitudinal version (LongComBat).Results: We defined 14 CT acquisition protocols for the harmonization process. Before harmonization, 76% of the features were significantly influenced by these protocols. After, all extracted features resulted in being independent of the acquisition parameters. In contrast, 5% of the LongComBat harmonized features still depended on acquisition protocols.Conclusions: We reduced the impact of different CT acquisition protocols on radiomic features extraction in a group of patients enrolled in a radiomic study on stage III NSCLC. The harmonization process appears essential for the quality of radiomic data and for their reproducibility