The second year has been completed

Among many other things, the last European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress in Munich brought changes to the ERS Junior Members Committee (JMC). The 3-year term of JMC representatives has seen Indre Butiene, who initiated the Committee 3 years ago, finish her tenure as chair, with Anders Bjerg, respiratory epidemiologist from Gothenburg, Sweden, being elected as her replacement. Indre’s departure has also led to the election of a new representative to the ERS Education Council. We congratulate Agnes Boots from the Netherlands on her election to this important position! Also, here in Breathe, the Doing Science series has been taken over by Georgia Hardavella, UK, whose ideas will take this practical educational series to new levels in 2015. The Hot Topics section is now coordinated by Neil Saad, UK, one of many Juniors outside the JMC who have volunteered for different JMC activities

Br. J. Cancer

BACKGROUND: We evaluated KRAS (mKRAS (mutant KRAS)) and BRAF (mBRAF (mutant BRAF)) mutations to determine their prognostic potential in assessing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for lung metastasectomy. METHODS: Data were reviewed from 180 patients with a diagnosis of CRC who underwent a lung metastasectomy between January 1998 and December 2011. RESULTS: Molecular analysis revealed mKRAS in 93 patients (51.7%), mBRAF in 19 patients (10.6%). In univariate analyses, overall survival (OS) was influenced by thoracic nodal status (median OS: 98 months for pN-, 27 months for pN+, P<0.0001), multiple thoracic metastases (75 months vs 101 months, P=0.008) or a history of liver metastases (94 months vs 101 months, P=0.04). mBRAF had a significantly worse OS than mKRAS and wild type (WT) (P<0.0001). The 5-year OS was 0% for mBRAF, 44% for mKRAS and 100% for WT, with corresponding median OS of 15, 55 and 98 months, respectively (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, WT BRAF (HR: 0.005 (95% CI: 0.001-0.02), P<0.0001) and WT KRAS (HR: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02-0.1), P<0.0001) had a significant impact on OS. CONCLUSIONS: mKRAS and mBRAF seem to be prognostic factors in patients with CRC who undergo lung metastasectomy. Further studies are necessary

Br. J. Cancer

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients who will experience lung cancer recurrence after surgery remains a challenge. We aimed to evaluate whether mutant forms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (mEGFR and mKRAS) are useful biomarkers in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 841 patients who underwent surgery and molecular testing for NSCLC between 2007 and 2012. RESULTS: mEGFR was observed in 103 patients (12.2%), and mKRAS in 265 (31.5%). The median overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence (TTR) were significantly lower for mKRAS (OS: 43 months; TTR: 19 months) compared with mEGFR (OS: 67 months; TTR: 24 months) and wild-type patients (OS: 55 months; disease-free survival (DFS): 24 months). Patients with KRAS G12V exhibited worse OS and TTR compared with the entire cohort (OS: KRAS G12V: 26 months vs COHORT: 60 months; DFS: KRAS G12V: 15 months vs COHORT: 24 months). These results were confirmed using multivariate analyses (non-G12V status, hazard ratio (HR): 0.43 (confidence interval: 0.28-0.65), P<0.0001 for OS; HR: 0.67 (0.48-0.92), P=0.01 for TTR). Risk of recurrence was significantly lower for non-KRAS G12V (HR: 0.01, (0.001-0.08), P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: mKRAS and mEGFR may predict survival and recurrence in early stages of NSCLC. Patients with KRAS G12V exhibited worse OS and higher recurrence incidences

Pathology

MET pathway is a promising target in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) requiring companion tests. The aim of this study was to compare MET expression/gene copy number in a Caucasian population of NSCLC patients.We analysed 201 NSCLC, with 141 adenocarcinomas classified according to 2011 IASLC recommendations, for MET expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene copy number (GCN) by silver in situ hybridisation (SISH) on tissue microarrays. Mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2, PIK3CA genes and ALK rearrangements were determined.MET overexpression was observed in 44% and a high MET GCN (≥5 copies) in 14%. MET CGN was correlated with MET expression, regardless of IHC scores (p < 0.001) but only 31% of MET overexpressed cases were SISH positive. MET overexpression/GCN number was more frequent in ADC than the other types (p < 0.001), the highest in high grade (74%/34%) and sarcomatoid ADC (86%/43%). Mutations of current genes or ALK rearrangements were identified in overexpressed or amplified MET cases. MET overexpression was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in non-smoker NSCLC in univariate (p = 0.01) and multivariate (p = 0.01) analyses.MET overexpression is more frequent than MET high GCN, particularly in high grade ADC, regardless of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2, PIK3CA and ALK status in NSCLC

Normothermic ex-vivo preservation with the portable Organ Care System Lung device for bilateral lung transplantation (INSPIRE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 study

Background: Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) of grade 3 (PGD3) is a common serious complication following lung transplantation. We aimed to assess physiological donor lung preservation using the Organ Care System (OCS) Lung device compared with cold static storage. Methods: In this non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (INSPIRE) recipients were aged 18 years or older and were registered as standard criteria primary double lung transplant candidates. Eligible donors were younger than 65 years old with a ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to the fraction of inspired oxygen of more than 300 mm Hg. Transplant recipients were randomly assigned (1:1) with permuted blocks, stratified by centre, to receive standard criteria donor lungs preserved in the OCS Lung device (OCS arm) or cold storage at 4\ub0C (control arm). The composite primary effectiveness endpoint was absence of PGD3 within the first 72 h after transplant and 30-day survival in the per-protocol population, with a stringent 4% non-inferiority margin. Superiority was tested upon meeting non-inferiority. The primary safety endpoint was the mean number of lung graft-related serious adverse events within 30 days of transplant. We did analyses in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat populations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01630434. Findings: Between Nov 17, 2011, and Nov 24, 2014, we randomly assigned 370 patients, and 320 (86%) underwent transplantation (n=151 OCS and n=169 control); follow-up was completed in Nov 24, 2016. The primary endpoint was met in 112 (79\ub74%) of 141 patients (95% CI 71\ub78 to 85\ub78) in the OCS group compared with 116 (70\ub73%) of 165 patients (62\ub77 to 77\ub72) in the control group (non-inferiority point estimate 129\ub71%; 95% CI 12 1e to 121\ub70; p=0\ub70038; and superiority test p=0\ub7068). Patient survival at day 30 post-transplant was 135 (95\ub77%) of 141 patients (95% CI 91\ub70\u201398\ub74) in the OCS group and 165 patients (100%; 97\ub78\u2013100\ub70) in the control group (p=0\ub70090) and at 12 months was 126 (89\ub74%) of 141 patients (83\ub71\u201393\ub79) for the OCS group compared with 146 (88\ub71%) of 165 patients (81\ub78\u201392\ub78) for the control group. Incidence of PGD3 within 72 h was reported in 25 (17\ub77%) of 141 patients in the OCS group (95% CI 11\ub78 to 25\ub71) and 49 (29\ub77%) of 165 patients in the control group (22\ub78 to 37\ub73; superiority test p=0\ub7015). The primary safety endpoint was met (0\ub723 lung graft-related serious adverse events in the OCS group compared with 0\ub728 events in the control group [point estimate 120\ub7045%; 95% CI 12 1e to 0\ub7047; non-inferiority test p=0\ub7020]). In the intention-to-treat population, causes of death at 30 days and in hospital were lung graft failure or lung infection (n=2 for OCS vs n=7 for control), cardiac causes (n=4 vs n=1), vascular or stroke (n=3 vs n=0), metabolic coma (n=0 vs n=2), and generalised sepsis (n=0 vs n=1). Interpretation: The INSPIRE trial met its primary effectiveness and safety endpoints. Although no short-term survival benefit was reported, further research is needed to see whether the reduced incidence of PGD3 within 72 h of a transplant might translate into earlier recovery and improved long-term outcomes after lung transplantation. Funding: TransMedics Inc