15 research outputs found
Pro-Poor Price Trends and Inequality -- The Case of India
It is well known that people's consumption patterns change with income. Relative price
changes therefore affect rich and poor consumers differently. Yet, the standard price indices are not income-specific and hence, the use of these mask these differences in cost-of-living. In this paper, we study consumption inequality in India, while fully allowing for non-homotheticity. Our analysis shows that the changes in relative prices in a large part of the period from 1993 to 2012 were pro-poor, in the sense that they favored the poor relative to the rich. As a result, we also find that the standard measures significantly overestimate the rise in real inequality. Moreover, we show that the allowance for non-homotheticity is quantitatively much more important in our application than the adjustment for substitution in consumption, despite the larger attention paid to the latter in the literature. We also illustrate how conventional measures exaggerate inter-temporal changes in inequality when there is segregation in consumption/production, by which we mean that people's consumption patterns are skewed towards goods intensively produced by people of their own group
Determinants of Long-Term Economic Growth Redux: A Measurement Error Model Averaging (MEMA) Approach
Trading Off Welfare and Immigration in Europe.
In this paper, we explore the trade-off Europe faces when choosing between immigration
from poor countries and welfare spending. Using data from the European
Social Survey on sixteen countries from 2002{2012, we document that voter preferences
shifted in favor of redistribution but polarized over low-skill immigration. Notably,
there is a sharp increase in the share of individuals supporting the welfare state but
heavily opposing immigration. In order to provide an economic explanation for these
phenomena, we present a model where support for both immigration and redistributive
policies are potentially motivated by altruism. Using this model, we show how rising
unemployment rates, shares of foreign-born citizens and aggregate education can explain
observed shifts in policy preferences