2 research outputs found

    Preparation and Characterization of Biochar and Activated Carbon Derived from Cashew Bagasse Waste

    Get PDF
    Biochar and Activated carbon derived from cashew bagasse waste are veritable materials produced from agro-waste. They are currently under-utilized owing to paucity of information in their recycling methods which reduces agricultural waste from the environment. This study investigates the use of under-utilized cashew bagasse waste in the production of biochar and activated carbon using pyrolysis and chemical activation methods, respectively. Cashew bagasse waste was pyrolysed at 4000C for 20mins at a heating rate of 100C per mins. The biochar produced was allowed to cool at room temperature for 30 mins. It was further reduced to smaller size particles using euro premium grinder and later sieved with 10 mesh sieve size prior to its application. The biochar was chemically activated using 0.3M Orthophosphoric acid (H3PO4) as activating agent at an impregnation ratio of 1:2.36(w/w). It was heated at 1000C to form a paste and later placed in muffle furnace at 5000C for 30 mins. This was allowed to cool and washed with distilled water until a neutral pH was obtained and later oven dried at 1050C for 24 hours to a constant weight to produce activated carbon. The produced activated carbon was kept in air tight containers prior to analysis. Characterization of pH, bulk density, moisture content, dry matter, volatile matter, and fixed carbon were determined for biochar and activated carbon. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed to determine the functional groups and surface morphology of biochar and activated carbon, respectively. The Data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA at P value < 0.05. The results showed that significant differences (p<0.05) were observed in the characterized parameters determined. The biochar and activated carbon has pH: (7.68±0.06 and 6.13±0.03); Bulk density :( 0.18±0.01 and 0.20±0.01) %; Moisture content: (6.67±0.33 and 16.00±0.58)%; Dry matter (93.33±0.33 and 84.00±0.58) %; Volatile matter (68.67±3.18 and 29.67±5.21) %; Fixed carbon (30.24±3.20 and 69.32±5.16) %, respectively. FTIR Analysis showed that biochar and activated carbon were more polar and also contained specific bonds. SEM analysis also indicated that biochar and activated carbon have porous structures. This study, therefore, revealed that chemically activated carbon had better characteristics than biochar produced through pyrolysis method

    Dynamics of co-infection in fish: A review of pathogen-host interaction and clinical outcome

    No full text
    Co-infections can affect the transmission of a pathogen within a population and the pathogen's virulence, ultimately affecting the disease's dynamics. In addition, co-infections can potentially affect the host's immunological responses, clinical outcomes, survival, and disease control efficacy. Co-infections significantly impact fish production and can change several fish diseases’ progression and severity. However, the effect of co-infection has only recently garnered limited attention in aquatic animals such as fish, and there is currently a dearth of studies on this topic. This study, therefore, presents an in-depth summary of the dynamics of co-infection in fish. This study reviewed the co-infection of fish pathogens, the interaction of pathogens and fish, clinical outcomes and impacts on fish immune responses, and fish survival. Most studies described the prevalence of co-infections in fish, with various parameters influencing their outcomes. Bacterial co-infection increased fish mortality, ulcerative dermatitis, and intestinal haemorrhage. Viral co-infection resulted in osmoregulatory effects, increased mortality and cytopathic effect (CPE). More severe histological alterations and clinical symptoms were related to the co-infection of fish than in single-infected fish. In parasitic co-infection, there was increased mortality, high kidney swelling index, and severe necrotic alterations in the kidney, liver, and spleen. In other cases, there were more severe kidney lesions, cartilage destruction and displacement. There was a dearth of information on mitigating co-infections in fish. Therefore, further studies on the mitigation strategies of co-infections in fish will provide valuable insights into this research area. Also, more research on the immunology of co-infection specific to each fish pathogen class (bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites) is imperative. The findings from such studies would provide valuable information on the relationship between fish immune systems and targeted responses
    corecore