21 research outputs found

    Rapid detection of MRSA in screening specimens during a hospital outbreak.

    No full text
    Objectives: To compare the results of rapid PCR screening for MRSA using the GeneXpert system with those of cultures in an outbreak setting. Methods: GeneXpert was used for screening MRSA in nose, throat, groin, and other clinical samples during a 6-month period. Samples were performed using a double-swab transystem. When >1 sample was found positive in a screening set, all second swabs of the set were analysed by culture. Results: From June to October 2009, 7568 rapid tests were performed, among which 432 (5.7%) were positive (nose: 149/2090, 7.1%; throat: 98/2078, 4.7%; groin: 152/2080, 7.3%; urine: 14/1090, 1.3%; wounds: 18/150, 12%; and others:1/27, 3.7%), and 84 (1.1%) were invalid. A total of 1517 samples were analyzed by both rapid PCR and culture. Rapid tests had a sensitivity of 0.896 compared to cultures, a specificity of 0.769, a PPV of 0.763, and a NPV of 0.899. The rapid test was found to be less sensitive in throat samples (0.81) than in nose or inguinal samples (0.93 for both). In 32/192 (16%) patients a positive rapid PCR result was not confirmed by culture, despite several subsequent screening samples in some patients. Cycle threshold (Ct) for SCCmec of these PCR positive reactions were all >30. Conclusions: GeneXpert MRSA was found to be suitable for the rapid detection in nose, inguinal, and throat samples, however with a lower sensitivity in the later. Negative cultures in 16% of our PCR-positive patients raised the question of false positivity or higher sensitivity of GeneXpert. Further work is needed to investigate these cases
    corecore