Macrophages Upregulate Estrogen Receptor Expression in the Model of Obesity-Associated Breast Carcinoma

Breast cancer (BC) and obesity are two heterogeneous conditions with a tremendous impact on health. BC is the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm and the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women, and the prevalence of obesity in women worldwide reaches pandemic proportions. Obesity is a significant risk factor for both incidence and worse prognosis in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) BC. Yet, the mechanisms underlying the association between excess adiposity and increased risk/therapy resistance/poorer outcome of ER+, but not ER−negative (ER−), BC are not fully understood. Tumor-promoting action of obesity, predominantly in ER + BC patients, is often attributed to the augmented production of estrogen in ‘obese’ adipose tissue. However, in addition to the estrogen production, expression levels of ER represent a key determinant in hormone-driven breast tumorigenesis and therapy response. Here, utilizing in vitro and in vivo models of BC, we show that macrophages, whose adverse activation by obesogenic substances is fueled by heparanase (extracellular matrix-degrading enzyme), are capable of upregulating ER expression in tumor cells, in the setting of obesity-associated BC. These findings underscore a previously unknown mechanism through which interplay between cellular/extracellular elements of obesity-associated BC microenvironment influences estrogen sensitivity—a critical component in hormone-related cancer progression and resistance to therapy

Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocyte transfusion in a patient with treatment refractory triple negative breast cancer

Abstract Background Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer that is treated with chemotherapy. Recently, programmed death 1 (PD1) inhibition, as well as antibody‐drug conjugates, have been added to the available treatment regimen, yet metastatic disease is fatal. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) has been well described in melanoma, but less data is available on other solid malignancies. Case Herein, we present a case of a 31‐year‐old patient diagnosed with Breast Cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) positive, TNBC. The patient's disease rapidly progressed while under standard treatment protocols. As a result, additional genetic testing of the tumor was carried out and revealed loss of BRCA1 heterozygosity, a double Tumor Protein 53 (TP53) mutation, and MYC amplification. Due to resistance to conventional therapy, an experimental approach was attempted using tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes in November 2021 at Hadassah University Medical Center. While receiving this treatment, the patient exhibited a reported subjective clinical improvement including a month spent out of the hospital. However, the final result, presumably due to Interleukin 2 (IL‐2) toxicity, was the patient's passing. Conclusion This case is unique and peculiar regarding the treatment modality chosen, due to the extremely refractory disease the patient suffered from. After standard therapies rapidly failed, adoptive cell therapy was attempted with the infusion of TILs. This treatment has been shown effective in melanoma, however, there is an extreme paucity of data on other solid tumors, including TNBC. Although the patient ultimately demised presumably due to treatment side effects, brief clinical benefit was apparent. Further studies are warranted

Clinical outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score 26-30: observational real-world cohort study

Abstract Data on adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in ER + HER2‒ early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with Recurrence Score (RS) 26-30 are limited. This real-world study evaluated the relationships between the RS, adjuvant treatments, and outcomes in 534 RS 26-30 patients tested through Clalit Health Services (N0: n = 394, 49% CT-treated; N1mi/N1: n = 140, 62% CT-treated). The CT-treated and untreated groups were imbalanced (more high-risk clinicopathologic characteristics in CT-treated patients). With median follow-up of 8 years, Kaplan–Meier estimates for overall survival (OS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) were not significantly different between CT-treated and untreated N0 patients. Seven-year rates (95% CI) in CT-treated vs untreated: OS, 97.9% (94.4–99.2%) vs 97.9% (94.6–99.2%); DRFS, 91.5% (86.6–94.7%) vs 91.2% (86.0–94.6%); BCSM, 0.5% (0.1–3.7%) vs 1.6% (0.5–4.7%). For N1mi/N1 patients, OS/DRFS did not differ significantly between treatment groups; whereas BCSM did (1.3% [0.2–8.6%] vs 6.2% [2.0–17.7%] for CT-treated and untreated patients, respectively, p = 0.024)