Is fetal gender associated with adverse perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in perinatal outcome by gender among growth-restricted fetuses. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) singleton pregnancies over a 5-year period. Clinical outcomes compared by gender included preterm delivery, perinatal mortality (PNM), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Statistical analysis included bivariate and multivariable techniques. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-seven singleton pregnancies with IUGR were identified. Three hundred and forty-six (47.6%) were males. Birth weight was similar between the groups. After adjusting for maternal demographics, medical history, gestational age, mode of delivery, and antenatal corticosteroids, adverse perinatal outcomes were similar between the groups. Severity of outcomes was also similar between males and females (P = .66). CONCLUSION: Male fetuses with IUGR have similar outcomes when compared with female IUGR fetuses. Gender does not play a role in perinatal outcome in the setting of fetal growth restriction

Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data.

OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth is the main cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography predicts preterm birth. Our aim was to estimate by meta-analysis of randomized trials whether cerclage prevents preterm birth in women with a short cervical length. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched with the terms cerclage, cervical cerclage, short cervix, ultrasound, and randomized trial. We included randomized trials involving the use of cerclage in women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography using patient-level data. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Four properly conducted trials were identified. In the total population, preterm birth at less than 35 weeks of gestation occurred in 29.2% (89/305) of the cerclage group, compared with 34.8% (105/302) of the no-cerclage groups (relative risk [RR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.06). There was no significant heterogeneity in the overall analysis (P = .29). There was a significant reduction in preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in the cerclage group compared with the no-cerclage groups in singleton gestations (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96), singleton gestations with prior preterm birth (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.92), and singleton gestations with prior second-trimester loss (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.99). There was a significant increase in preterm birth at less than 35 weeks in twin gestations (RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.15-4.01). CONCLUSION: Cerclage does not prevent preterm birth in all women with short cervical length on transvaginal ultrasonography. In the subgroup analysis of singleton gestations with short cervical length, especially those with a prior preterm birth, cerclage may reduce preterm birth, and a well-powered trial should be carried out in this group of patients. In contrast, in twins, cerclage was associated with a significantly higher incidence of preterm birth

The Relationship Between a Reviewer\u27s Recommendation and Editorial Decision of Manuscripts Submitted for Publication in Obstetrics.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the extent to which reviewers\u27 recommendations influence the final editorial disposition of manuscripts submitted for publication. STUDY DESIGN: Five reviewers retrieved their electronic databases of obstetrical manuscripts that they had reviewed for Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The recommendations of each reviewer were grouped in 1 of 3 categories: rejection (or not acceptance), acceptance with major revisions, and acceptance with minor or no revisions. These recommendations were contrasted in the final editorial disposition of the manuscript, which was recorded as accepted or rejected. The quality of the reviews was assessed in a random sample of 10% of the reviews, stratified by reviewer and journal. RESULTS: A total of 635 reviews were analyzed. Overall, the most influential reviewers\u27 recommendation was rejection, which was accompanied by 93% rejection rate. Recommendation for acceptance with minor or no revisions was accompanied by 67% acceptance rate whereas acceptance with major revisions was accompanied by 40% acceptance rate. There were no variations among reviewers regarding their degree of influence with respect to the final disposition of the manuscript. The final disposition of manuscripts was not influenced by the quality of the reviews nor reviewer\u27s demographics including reviewer\u27s age, year of first peer review, and years active in peer review. CONCLUSION: The degree of influence on the final disposition of the manuscript depends on the type of recommendation. A recommendation for rejection was the most influential and it was associated with a high rate of rejection. Recommendations for acceptance or minor revisions were also influential but to a lesser degree

Should all pregnant diabetic women undergo a fetal echocardiography? A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four screening strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a policy of universal fetal echocardiography for all pregnant diabetic women is cost-effective as a screening tool for congenital heart defects. STUDY DESIGN: Using a decision-analysis model, we compared the cost-effectiveness of four screening strategies: (1) none--no ultrasound is performed; (2) selective fetal echocardiography after abnormal detailed anatomic survey; (3) fetal echocardiography for only high hemoglobin A1C, and (4) universal fetal echocardiography for all diabetics. The sensitivity and specificity for each strategy were derived by literature search. The analysis was from a societal perspective using a willingness-to-pay threshold (50,000 dollars) and a theoretic cohort of 40,000 pregnant diabetics. Costs included costs of tests and the costs of complications and of raising a child with a cardiac defect. Outcomes were reported as cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained for each congenital heart defect prevented by each strategy and the number of congenital heart defects detected. One-way, multiway and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Compared with the other strategies, selective fetal echocardiography after abnormal detailed anatomic survey costs less per QALY gained for cardiac defect screening. Although universal fetal echocardiography was associated with a higher detection rate for cardiac defects, it was more costly. The sensitivity analyses revealed a robust model over a wide range of values. CONCLUSION: Under the baseline assumptions, selective fetal echocardiography after an abnormal detailed anatomic survey is more cost-effective compared with universal fetal echocardiography as a screening strategy for cardiac defects in pregnant diabetics

What antepartum fetal test should guide the timing of delivery of the preterm growth-restricted fetus? A decision-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to use a decision-analytic approach to explore the best strategy for the timing of the delivery of preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. STUDY DESIGN: We constructed a decision-analysis model that compared 4 antenatal fetal testing strategies The fetal/neonatal states that were compared included live in utero pregnancy; fetal death; neonatal death; disabled neonate, and healthy neonate. Probability estimates for these states and sensitivity and specificity for Doppler velocimetry and biophysical profile were derived from literature review. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the baseline assumptions. RESULTS: Under the baseline assumptions, biophysical profile was the best test to guide decisions on delivery. Sensitivity analyses revealed the model to be sensitive only to the specificity of a biophysical profile \u3c82%. CONCLUSION: Compared with the other options, biophysical profile was the best strategy to guide physicians on the timing of the delivery of the preterm growth-restricted fetus

Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth in women with short cervical length.

The efficacy of Shirodkar cerclage was compared with that of the McDonald procedure for the prevention of preterm birth (PTB) in women with a short cervix. Secondary analysis using data from all published randomized trials including women with a short cervical length (CL) was performed comparing the use of Shirodkar versus McDonald sutures. Analysis was limited to singletons with short CL on transvaginal ultrasound. The primary outcome measure was PTB \u3c 33 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using bivariate and multivariable techniques. From 607 women randomly assigned in the study, 277 met our inclusion criteria; 127 received Shirodkar and 150 women received McDonald sutures. The mean ( +/- standard deviation) gestational age at delivery was 35.0 +/- 5.3 versus 36.3 +/- 4.7 for the Shirodkar versus McDonald groups, respectively ( p\u3c 0.02). PTB \u3c 33 weeks was seen in 61 (22%) of 277 women; 26 (20%) of 127 in the Shirodkar and 35 (23%) of 150 in the McDonald groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 1.6). On adjusting for confounders using logistic regression modeling, no significant difference in PTB \u3c 33 weeks was found between the two groups (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3). In women with short cervical length randomly assigned to receiving cerclage, no significant difference in prevention of PTB was observed using Shirodkar or McDonald\u27s procedures

Mild pyelectasis: evaluating the relationship between gestational age and renal pelvic anterior-posterior diameter.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between gestational age and renal pelvic anterior-posterior diameter and the feasibility of developing gestational age-specific thresholds for the diagnosis of mild pyelectasis. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 420 singleton fetuses between 16 and 39 weeks\u27 gestation. The mean renal AP diameter as a function of gestational age was determined using fractional polynomial regression models and centile plots were generated. Assessment of goodness of fit for each regression model was performed. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between gestational age and renal pelvic AP diameter (Pearson\u27s Correlation Coefficient 0.65). Using the derived mean and standard deviations of renal AP diameter, gestational-age specific 95% reference levels were generated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of using the gestational age-specific cutoffs for predicting persistent postnatal renal anomaly were 80%; 99%; 29%; and 99% respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a positive correlation between gestational age and renal pelvic AP diameters. Reliable gestational age-specific renal AP thresholds for diagnosis of pyelectasis are provided