No inherent left and right side in human ‘mental number line': evidence from right brain damage

Spatial reasoning has a relevant role in mathematics and helps daily computational activities. It is widely assumed that in cultures with left-to-right reading, numbers are organized along the mental equivalent of a ruler, the mental number line, with small magnitudes located to the left of larger ones. Patients with right brain damage can disregard smaller numbers while mentally setting the midpoint of number intervals. This has been interpreted as a sign of spatial neglect for numbers on the left side of the mental number line and taken as a strong argument for the intrinsic left-to-right organization of the mental number line. Here, we put forward the understanding of this cognitive disability by discovering that patients with right brain damage disregard smaller numbers both when these are mapped on the left side of the mental number line and on the right side of an imagined clock face. This shows that the right hemisphere supports the representation of small numerical magnitudes independently from their mapping on the left or the right side of a spatial-mental layout. In addition, the study of the anatomical correlates through voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and the mapping of lesion peaks on the diffusion tensor imaging-based reconstruction of white matter pathways showed that the rightward bias in the imagined clock-face was correlated with lesions of high-level middle temporal visual areas that code stimuli in object-centred spatial coordinates, i.e. stimuli that, like a clock face, have an inherent left and right side. In contrast, bias towards higher numbers on the mental number line was linked to white matter damage in the frontal component of the parietal-frontal number network. These anatomical findings show that the human brain does not represent the mental number line as an object with an inherent left and right side. We conclude that the bias towards higher numbers in the mental bisection of number intervals does not depend on left side spatial, imagery or object-centred neglect and that it rather depends on disruption of an abstract non-spatial representation of small numerical magnitude

Anti-endothelial autoantibodies in patients with sudden hearing loss.

ObjectiveslHypothesis: Sudden hearing loss (HL) can be caused by autoimmune disorders localized to the inner ear or secondary to systemic immune dis- eases. Studies in autoimmune animal strains showing HL have reported changes in the cochlear stria vas- cularis. The authors investigated the presence of an- tiendothelial cell antibodies (AECA) to see if immune- mediated vasculitis may play a role in human sudden HL. Study Design: A prospective study in patients with sudden HL. Methods: Fifteen consecutive pa- tients (mean age, 32 y) affected by sudden HL and 14 normal subjects were included. Patients with familial deafness and metabolic diseases were excluded. Ex- tensive audiovestibular, imaging, microbiological, immunological, and routine examinations were per- formed. AECA were detected on rat kidney tissue sec- tions on the sera collected at -20°C. Results: AECA were positive in 8 of 15 patients (53%) (2 of 5 men and 6 of 10 women), thus differing significantly from the normal control population, in which only 2 of 14 tested AECA positive (P = .023). Conclusions: In pa- tients with sudden HL, immune-mediated vascular damage can have a pathogenetic role and AECA might represent a serological marker of vasculitis. Key Words: Sudden hearing loss, immune-mediated vascular damage, anti-endothelial cell antibodies

Evaluation of telomerase activity in nasal polyps

Background: The objective of this study was to assess if nasal polyps express telomerase activity and whether a difference could be found between the polyp and the surrounding mucosa of the middle meatus and between different portions of the polyp itself. Methods: Nine patients affected by nasal polyposis were included in this study; four of these patients had recurring polyposis. Telomerase activity was measured by telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay. In six patients, the telomeric repeat amplification protocol assay was performed on the polyp and on the mucosa from the ipsilateral middle meatus. In a polyp, we were able to investigate telomerase activity of its different portions, corresponding to pedicle and fundus. Results: Telomerase activity observed in nasal polyps was higher than that observed in samples from the ipsilateral middle meatus mucosa. High or intermediate telomerase activity was found to be related to predominant recurring polyposis. Conclusions: Therefore, it could be postulated that telomerase activity could be related with the tendency of polyps to recur

Clinical associations of serum antiendothelial cell antibodies in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss

clinica

Insolita causa di addome acuto in paziente adulto: l’ileo biliare

L’ileo biliare è una condizione morbosa rara descritta tra le complicanze della litiasi della colecisti. È causa dell’1-3% delle ostruzioni meccaniche del piccolo intestino. Interessa più frequentemente pazienti di età compresa tra 63 e 85 anni. La diagnosi pre-operatoria è generalmente posta con ritardo variabile da 1 a 10 giorni per l’assenza di una sintomatologia specifica. Caso clinico. Gli Autori riportano il caso di un uomo di 50 anni in cui è stata posta diagnosi di occlusione meccanica del piccolo intestino da voluminosa concrezione litiasica. L’occlusione ileale è stata dimostrata con la TC. Il paziente è stato sottoposto in urgenza ad intervento chirurgico, in un unico tempo, di enterolitotomia, colecistectomia e riparazione della fistola duodenale. Il decorso clinico è stato regolare e il paziente è stato dimesso in XIV giornata. Discussione. Nel nostro caso la diagnosi di ileo biliare è stata posta con un ritardo di 5 giorni. L’ecotomografia del fegato e delle vie biliari non è stata in grado di visualizzare la colecisti. La diagnosi è stata posta con la TC che si conferma gold standard diagnostico. Conclusioni. Lo stato clinico del paziente influenza la strategia chirurgica. Nel nostro paziente, considerato a basso rischio, è stato possibile l’intervento chirurgico in un unico tempo. La procedura in due tempi, enterolitotomia e successiva colecistectomia con riparazione della fistola, va riservata ai pazienti ad alto rischio

The efficacy of imatinib mesylate in patients with FIP1L1-PDGFRα-positive hypereosinophilic syndrome. Results of a multicenter prospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) may be associated with the fusion of the platelet derived growth factor receptor a (PDGFRalpha) gene with the FIP1L1 gene in chromosome 4 coding for a constitutively activated PDGFRalpha tyrosine kinase. These cases with FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha rearrangement have been reported to be very sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate. DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study of idiopathic or primary HES was established in 2001 (Study Protocol Registration no. NCT 0027 6929). One hundred and ninety-six patients were screened, of whom 72 where identified as having idiopathic or primary HES and 63 were treated with imatinib 100 to 400 mg daily. RESULTS: Twenty-seven male patients carried the FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha rearrangement. All 27 achieved a complete hematologic remission (CHR) and became negative for the fusion transcripts according to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. With a median follow-up of 25 months (15-60 months) all 27 patients remain in CHR and RT-PCR negative, and continue treatment at a dose of 100 to 400 mg daily. In three patients imatinib treatment was discontinued for few months, the fusion transcript became rapidly detectable, and then again undetectable upon treatment reassumption. Thirty-six patients did not carry the rearrangement; of these, five (14%) achieved a CHR, which was lost in all cases after 1 to 15 months. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: All patients meeting the criteria for idiopathic or primary HES should be screened for the FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha rearrangement. For all patients with this rearrangement, chronic imatinib treatment at doses as low as 100 mg daily ensures complete and durable responses

Colorectal Cancer Stage at Diagnosis Before vs During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy

IMPORTANCE Delays in screening programs and the reluctance of patients to seek medical attention because of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 could be associated with the risk of more advanced colorectal cancers at diagnosis. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic was associated with more advanced oncologic stage and change in clinical presentation for patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included all 17 938 adult patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021 (pandemic period), and from January 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (prepandemic period), in 81 participating centers in Italy, including tertiary centers and community hospitals. Follow-up was 30 days from surgery. EXPOSURES Any type of surgical procedure for colorectal cancer, including explorative surgery, palliative procedures, and atypical or segmental resections. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was advanced stage of colorectal cancer at diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were distant metastasis, T4 stage, aggressive biology (defined as cancer with at least 1 of the following characteristics: signet ring cells, mucinous tumor, budding, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and lymphangitis), stenotic lesion, emergency surgery, and palliative surgery. The independent association between the pandemic period and the outcomes was assessed using multivariate random-effects logistic regression, with hospital as the cluster variable. RESULTS A total of 17 938 patients (10 007 men [55.8%]; mean [SD] age, 70.6 [12.2] years) underwent surgery for colorectal cancer: 7796 (43.5%) during the pandemic period and 10 142 (56.5%) during the prepandemic period. Logistic regression indicated that the pandemic period was significantly associated with an increased rate of advanced-stage colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95%CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .03), aggressive biology (OR, 1.32; 95%CI, 1.15-1.53; P < .001), and stenotic lesions (OR, 1.15; 95%CI, 1.01-1.31; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study suggests a significant association between the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the risk of a more advanced oncologic stage at diagnosis among patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer and might indicate a potential reduction of survival for these patients

How future surgery will benefit from SARS-COV-2-related measures: a SPIGC survey conveying the perspective of Italian surgeons

COVID-19 negatively affected surgical activity, but the potential benefits resulting from adopted measures remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in surgical activity and potential benefit from COVID-19 measures in perspective of Italian surgeons on behalf of SPIGC. A nationwide online survey on surgical practice before, during, and after COVID-19 pandemic was conducted in March-April 2022 (NCT:05323851). Effects of COVID-19 hospital-related measures on surgical patients' management and personal professional development across surgical specialties were explored. Data on demographics, pre-operative/peri-operative/post-operative management, and professional development were collected. Outcomes were matched with the corresponding volume. Four hundred and seventy-three respondents were included in final analysis across 14 surgical specialties. Since SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, application of telematic consultations (4.1% vs. 21.6%; p < 0.0001) and diagnostic evaluations (16.4% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.0001) increased. Elective surgical activities significantly reduced and surgeons opted more frequently for conservative management with a possible indication for elective (26.3% vs. 35.7%; p < 0.0001) or urgent (20.4% vs. 38.5%; p < 0.0001) surgery. All new COVID-related measures are perceived to be maintained in the future. Surgeons' personal education online increased from 12.6% (pre-COVID) to 86.6% (post-COVID; p < 0.0001). Online educational activities are considered a beneficial effect from COVID pandemic (56.4%). COVID-19 had a great impact on surgical specialties, with significant reduction of operation volume. However, some forced changes turned out to be benefits. Isolation measures pushed the use of telemedicine and telemetric devices for outpatient practice and favored communication for educational purposes and surgeon-patient/family communication. From the Italian surgeons' perspective, COVID-related measures will continue to influence future surgical clinical practice