Failure to Rescue, Hospital Volume, and In-Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Failure to rescue (FTR), death after major complications, has been well described in the surgical literature as a source of different outcomes in different hospitals. However, FTR has not been investigated in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Our aim was to assess the difference of in-patient mortality and FTR in different TAVI volume hospitals. We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2011 to 2015 to identify patients who had transarterial TAVI. FTR was calculated as those who had in-patient mortality with at least one with major perioperative complications. Hospitals were divided into three groups according to annual TAVI volume, the lowest quintile (≤30/year), second to fourth quintile (31 to 130/year), and highest quintile (≥130/year). Multivariate analysis was used to calculate risk adjusted in-patient mortality rate and FTR and was compared between these different volume hospitals. A total of 48,886 TAVI procedures were identified (10,407, 28,811, and 9,668 in low, intermediate, and high volume centers, respectively). Mean age, percentage of woman, and Elixhauser co-morbidity index was similar across different TAVI volume hospital. The incidence of major perioperative complications did not differ in different volume hospitals. Adjusted rate of in-patient mortality (2.3%, 1.87%, and 1.57% for low, intermediate, and high volume center, respectively,

Association of peripheral artery disease with in-hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and its association with in-hospital outcomes after endovascular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (EV-TAVR). BACKGROUND: TAVR is an established treatment for patients at prohibitive, high, or intermediate surgical risk. PAD is a significant comorbidity in the determination of surgical risk. However, data on association of PAD with outcomes after EV-TAVR are limited. METHODS: Patients in the National Inpatient Sample who underwent EV-TAVR between January 1, 2012 and September 30, 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 51,685 patients underwent EV-TAVR during the study period. Of these, 12,740 (24.6%) had a coexisting diagnosis of PAD. The adjusted odds for in-hospital mortality [OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.41)], permanent pacemaker implantation [OR 0.98 (0.85-1.14)], conversion to open aortic valve replacement [OR 1.05 (0.49-2.26)], or acute myocardial infarction [OR 1.31(0.99-1.71)] were not different in patients with versus without PAD. However, patients with PAD had greater adjusted odds of vascular complications [OR 1.80 (1.50-2.16)], major bleeding [OR 1.20 (1.09-1.34)], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 1.19 (1.05-1.36)], cardiac complications [aOR 1.21 (1.01-1.44)], and stroke [OR 1.39(1.10-1.75)] compared with patients without PAD. Length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer for patients with PAD [7.23 (0.14) days vs. 7.11 (0.1) days, p \u3c 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Of patients undergoing EV-TAVR, ~25% have coexisting PAD. PAD was not associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality but was associated with higher risk of vascular complications, major bleeding, AKI, stroke, cardiac complications, and longer LOS