21 research outputs found

    Fish Oil for the Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundRecent trials of fish oil for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence have provided mixed results. Notable uncertainties in the existing evidence base include the roles of high-dose fish oil, inflammation, and oxidative stress in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF not receiving conventional antiarrhythmic (AA) therapy.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of high-dose fish oil on AF recurrence, inflammation, and oxidative stress parameters.MethodsWe performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study in 337 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF within 6 months of enrollment. Patients were randomized to fish oil (4 g/day) or placebo and followed, on average, for 271 ± 129 days.ResultsThe primary endpoint was time to first symptomatic or asymptomatic AF recurrence lasting >30 s. Secondary endpoints were high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). The primary endpoint occurred in 64.1% of patients in the fish oil arm and 63.2% of patients in the placebo arm (hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 1.45; p = 0.48). hs-CRP and MPO were within normal limits at baseline and decreased to a similar degree at 6 months (Δhs-CRP, 11% vs. −11%; ΔMPO, −5% vs. −9% for fish oil vs. placebo, respectively; p value for interaction = NS).ConclusionsHigh-dose fish oil does not reduce AF recurrence in patients with a history of AF not receiving conventional AA therapy. Furthermore, fish oil does not reduce inflammation or oxidative stress markers in this population, which may explain its lack of efficacy. (Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Effect of N-3 Fatty Acids [OMEGA-3] on Arrhythmia Recurrence in Atrial Fibrillation [AFFORD]; NCT01235130)

    Primitive layered gabbros from fast-spreading lower oceanic crust

    Get PDF
    Three-quarters of the oceanic crust formed at fast-spreading ridges is composed of plutonic rocks whose mineral assemblages, textures and compositions record the history of melt transport and crystallization between the mantle and the sea floor. Despite the importance of these rocks, sampling them in situ is extremely challenging owing to the overlying dykes and lavas. This means that models for understanding the formation of the lower crust are based largely on geophysical studies and ancient analogues (ophiolites) that did not form at typical mid-ocean ridges. Here we describe cored intervals of primitive, modally layered gabbroic rocks from the lower plutonic crust formed at a fast-spreading ridge, sampled by the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program at the Hess Deep rift. Centimetre-scale, modally layered rocks, some of which have a strong layering-parallel foliation, confirm a long-held belief that such rocks are a key constituent of the lower oceanic crust formed at fast-spreading ridges. Geochemical analysis of these primitive lower plutonic rocks-in combination with previous geochemical data for shallow-level plutonic rocks, sheeted dykes and lavas-provides the most completely constrained estimate of the bulk composition of fast-spreading oceanic crust so far. Simple crystallization models using this bulk crustal composition as the parental melt accurately predict the bulk composition of both the lavas and the plutonic rocks. However, the recovered plutonic rocks show early crystallization of orthopyroxene, which is not predicted by current models of melt extraction from the mantle and mid-ocean-ridge basalt differentiation. The simplest explanation of this observation is that compositionally diverse melts are extracted from the mantle and partly crystallize before mixing to produce the more homogeneous magmas that erupt

    A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality

    No full text
    Diagnosis of arrhythmic disorders is challenging because of their short-lasting, intermittent character. Conventional technologies of noninvasive ambulatory rhythm monitoring are limited by modest sensitivity. We present a novel form of wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors providing an alternative tool for long-term rhythm monitoring with the potential of increased sensitivity to detect intermittent or subclinical arrhythmia. The objective was to assess the signal quality and R-R coverage of a wearable ECG sensor system compared to a standard 3-lead Holter. In this phase-1 trial, healthy individuals underwent 24-h simultaneous rhythm monitoring using the OMsignal system together with a 3-lead Holter recording. The OMsignal system consists of a garment (bra or shirt) with integrated sensors recording a single-lead ECG and an acquisition module for data storage and processing. Head-to-head signal quality was assessed regarding adequate P-QRS-T distinction and was performed by three electrophysiologists blinded to the recording technology. The accuracy of signal coverage was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Fifteen individuals underwent simultaneous 24-h recording. Signal quality and accuracy of the OMgaments was equivalent to Holter-monitoring (84% vs 93% electrophysiologists rating, p = 0.06). Signal coverage of R-R intervals showed a very close overlay between the OMsignal system and Holter signals, mean difference in heart rate of 2 5 bpm. The noise level of OMgarments was comparable to Holter recording. OMgarments provide high signal quality for adequate rhythm analysis, representing a promising novel technology for long-term non-invasive ECG monitoring

    Rate, time course, and predictors of implantable cardioverter defibrillator infections: an analysis from the SIMPLE trial

    No full text
    Background: The number of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) infections is increasing due to an increased number of ICD implants, higher-risk patients, and more frequent replacement procedures, which carry a higher risk of infection. Reducing the morbidity, mortality, and cost of ICD-related infections requires an understanding of the current rate of this complication and its predictors. Methods: The Shock Implant Evaluation Trial (SIMPLE) trial randomized 2500 ICD recipients to defibrillation testing or not. Over an average of 3.1 years, patients were seen every 6 months and examined for evidence of ICD infection, which was defined as requiring device removal and/or intravenous antibiotics. Results: Within 24 months, 21 patients (0.8%) developed infection. Fourteen patients (67%) with infection presented within 30 days, 20 patients by 12 months, and only 1 patient beyond 12 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated that patients with primary electrical disorders (3 patients, P = 0.009) and those with a secondary prevention indication (13 patients, P = 0.0009) were more likely to develop infection. Among the 2.2% of patients who developed an ICD wound hematoma, 10.4% developed an infection. Among the 8.3% of patients requiring an ICD reintervention, 1.9% developed an infection. Conclusions: This cohort of ICD recipients at high-volume centres have a low risk of device-related infection. However; strategies to reduce wound hematoma and the need for ICD reintervention could further reduce the rate of infection.Contexte: L’incidence des cas d’infection du dĂ©fibrillateur cardioverteur implantable (DCI) augmente en raison du nombre accru d’implantations, de l’emploi de ces dispositifs chez des patients exposĂ©s Ă  un risque trĂšs Ă©levĂ© et de l’augmentation de la frĂ©quence des interventions de remplacement, qui sont associĂ©es Ă  un plus grand risque d’infections. Pour parvenir Ă  rĂ©duire la morbiditĂ©, la mortalitĂ© et les coĂ»ts associĂ©s aux infections liĂ©es Ă  un DCI, il faut connaĂźtre la frĂ©quence de cette complication et les facteurs qui permettent de la prĂ©dire. MĂ©thodologie: Lors de l’essai S hock Impl ant E valuation Trial (SIMPLE), 2 500 patients ayant reçu un DCI ont Ă©tĂ© rĂ©partis alĂ©atoirement en deux groupes, l’un subissant des tests de dĂ©fibrillation et l’autre, non. Sur une pĂ©riode de 3,1 ans en moyenne, les patients ont Ă©tĂ© vus en consultation tous les 6 mois et examinĂ©s Ă  la recherche de signes d’infection du DCI, dĂ©finie comme Ă©tant une infection exigeant le retrait du dispositif et/ou l’administration d’antibiotiques par voie intraveineuse. RĂ©sultats: Au total, 21 patients (0,8 %) ont prĂ©sentĂ© une infection dans les 24 mois suivant l’implantation. Quatorze patients (67 %) ont prĂ©sentĂ© une infection dans les 30 jours suivant l’intervention; Ă  12 mois, 20 patients avaient prĂ©sentĂ© une infection. Un seul patient a prĂ©sentĂ© une infection plus de 12 mois aprĂšs l’intervention. Les rĂ©sultats d’une analyse univariĂ©e ont dĂ©montrĂ© qu’une infection Ă©tait plus probable chez les patients qui prĂ©sentaient un trouble Ă©lectrique primaire (3 patients, p = 0,009) et chez ceux qui avaient reçu un dispositif en prĂ©vention secondaire (13 patients, p = 0,0009). Parmi les patients qui prĂ©sentaient un hĂ©matome aprĂšs l’implantation du DCI (2,2 %), 10,4 % ont prĂ©sentĂ© une infection. Parmi les patients qui ont eu besoin d’une nouvelle intervention relative au DCI (8,3 %), 1,9 % ont prĂ©sentĂ© une infection. Conclusions: Les patients de cette cohorte ayant reçu un DCI dans des Ă©tablissements Ă  haut volume Ă©taient exposĂ©s Ă  un faible risque d’infection du dĂ©fibrillateur. Des stratĂ©gies visant Ă  rĂ©duire les hĂ©matomes et la nĂ©cessitĂ© d’une nouvelle intervention sur les DCI pourraient toutefois contribuer Ă  rĂ©duire encore plus la frĂ©quence des infections
    corecore