36 research outputs found

    Prognostic significance of N-Terminal Pro-BNP in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without previous history of heart failure

    Get PDF
    Introduction:The objective of the present research was to evaluate the possible association between the N-terminal pro-brain type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and in-hospital mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia patients who did not have pre-existing heart failure (HF). Methods:A total of 137 consecutive patients without pre-existing HF and hospitalized due to COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled into the current research. The main outcome of the research was the in-hospital death. The independent parameters linked with the in-hospital death were determined by multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 26 deaths with an in-hospital mortality rate of 18.9% was noted. Those who died were older with an increased frequency of co-morbidities such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, stroke and dementia. They had also increased white blood cell (WBC) counts and had elevated glucose, creatinine, troponin I, and NT-pro-BNP levels but had decreased levels of hemoglobin. By multivariable analysis; age, NT-pro-BNP, WBC, troponin I, and creatinine levels were independently linked with the in-hospital mortality. After ROC evaluation, the ideal value of the NT-pro-BNP to predict the in-hospital mortality was found as 260 ng/L reflecting a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 93% (AUC:0.86; 95%CI:0.76-0.97). Conclusion: The current research clearly shows that the NT-proBNP levels are independently linked with the in-hospital mortality rates in subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia and without HF. Thus, we believe that this biomarker can be used as a valuable prognostic parameter in such cases

    A simplified proximal isovelocity surface area method for mitral valve area calculation in mitral stenosis: not requiring angle correction and calculator

    No full text
    Aim To simplify proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method for mitral valve area (MVA) calculation that does not necessitate the usage of a calculator and angle correction, and to compare values estimated using this novel method with the values obtained by the conventional PISA, planimetry and pressure half-time (PHT) methods. Methods We evaluated patients with a wide range of mitral stenosis (MS) severity. The MVA was measured by the methods of PHT (MVA (PHT)), planimetry (MVA(pl)), conventional PISA (MVA(C-PISA)) and the novel method of simple PISA (MVA(S-PISA)). Application of simple PISA was performed subsequently by division of the peak mitral inflow velocity by four; measurement of the radius by adjusting the aliasing velocity to this value; square of the radius gives the MVA(S-PISA). Results Twenty patients were enrolled in the study. Peak and mean pressure gradients of patients were 20 +/- 6 mmHg and 10 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively. The average values of MVA(pl), MVA(PHT), MVA(C-PISA) and MVA (S-PISA) were 1,54 +/- 0,41, 1,65 +/- 0,40, 1,58 +/- 0,42, 1,57 +/- 0,44 cm(2), respectively. MVA(S-PISA) had a strong correlation with the MVA(C-PISA), MVA(pl), and MVA(PHT). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between simple PISA and the other methods. The agreement between planimetry and simple PISA methods for detecting severe mitral stenosis (MVA<1.5 cm(2)) determined by ROC analysis was very good with a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % and 92%, respectively. Conclusion Simple PISA is a user friendly method which does not take time and gives simple and correct results. If the diagnostic power of the technique is proven by more comprehensive studies, it can supersede the conventional PISA method

    Classic Mitral Valve Prolapse Causes Enlargement in Left Ventricle Even in the Absence of Significant Mitral Regurgitation

    No full text
    Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether left ventricular size was increased in patients with classic bileaflet mitral valve prolapse (MVP) in the absence of significant mitral regurgitation (MR). Method: Patients with classic bileaflet MVP were included as the case group. Two different control groups were established. The first control group was composed of the patients with mild MR caused by the reasons except MVP. The second control group consisted of healthy individuals whose echocardiograms were normal. The patients with moderate or severe MR and having abnormality in the other valves were excluded. Results: There were 20 patients in each group. Systolic and diastolic diameters and volumes of left ventricle (LV) in the MVP group were significantly higher than those in the control groups. In 10 of the patients in the MVP group, LV internal diastolic diameter (LVIDD) values were measured as =5.7 cm, whereas increased LVIDD value was detected in only one patient in the other two control groups. There was a significant difference in terms of the presence of increased LVIDD values between the MVP group and the control groups. Despite this enlargement in the LV dimension, the LV ejection fractions were found similar in all groups. Furthermore, it was found that the lengths of both anterior and posterior mitral leaflets in MVP group were significantly higher than those in the control groups. Conclusion: The LV diameters and volumes of patients with classic bileaflet MVP were found to be increased even in the absence of significant MR. These results need to be supported by large-scale clinical studies. (Echocardiography 2012;29:123-129
    corecore