Majority of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission have mucosal inflammation

Background: Management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasingly focused on mucosal remission. We assessed the prevalence of mucosal inflammation during clinical remission, the clinical consequences, and the impact on disease course. Methods: IBD patients from two referral centers who underwent a surveillance colonoscopy while clinically in remission between January 2001 and December 2003 were included. Follow-up ended May 1, 2009. Clinical data were collected from patient charts. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t-tests and nonparametric tests. Results: In total, 152 IBD patients were included (98 [65%] ulcerative colitis, 46 [30%] Crohn's disease; 85 [56%] males). Median follow-up was 6.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 68). Forty-seven (31%) patients had no signs of inflammation during endoscopy (group A). Of the remaining 105 (68%) patients, 51 (49%) had both endoscopic and histological inflammation (group B), 51 (49%) histological inflammation only (group C), two (2%) endoscopic lesions only (group D). Two years later, 29% of all patients had endoscopic inflammation and another 27% had only microscopic inflammation. In 39% the inflammation had resolved spontaneously. Inflammation was more often found in group B+C (n = 62/102; 61%) than in group A (n = 17/47; 36%; P = 0.21). Inflammation was not associated with more frequent clinical relapses nor with stricture formation, nor with the need for surgery. Conclusions: A large proportion of IBD patients have mucosal inflammation without clinical symptoms. Although one-third recover spontaneously, mucosal inflammation in patients who are clinically in remission is associated with more severe mucosal disease activity, but not with more complications or symptomatic flares during follow-up. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012

Life-prolonging treatment restrictions and outcomes in patients with cancer and COVID-19: an update from the Dutch Oncology COVID-19 Consortium

Aim of the study: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted cancer care. In this study, clinical patient characteristics related to COVID-19 outcomes and advanced care planning, in terms of non-oncological treatment restrictions (e.g. do-not-resuscitate codes), were studied in patients with cancer and COVID-19. Methods: The Dutch Oncology COVID-19 Consortium registry was launched in March 2020 in 45 hospitals in the Netherlands, primarily to identify risk factors of a severe COVID-19 outcome in patients with cancer. Here, an updated analysis of the registry was performed, and treatment restrictions (e.g. do-not-intubate codes) were studied in relation to COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer. Oncological treatment restrictions were not taken into account. Results: Between 27th March 2020 and 4th February 2021, 1360 patients with cancer and COVID-19 were registered. Follow-up data of 830 patients could be validated for this analysis. Overall, 230 of 830 (27.7%) patients died of COVID-19, and 60% of the remaining 600 patients with resolved COVID-19 were admitted to the hospital. Patients with haematological malignancies or lung cancer had a higher risk of a fatal outcome than other solid tumours. No correlation between anticancer therapies and the risk of a fatal COVID-19 outcome was found. In terms of end-of-life communication, 50% of all patients had restrictions regarding life-prolonging treatment (e.g. do-not-intubate codes). Most identified patients with treatment restrictions had risk factors associated with fatal COVID-19 outcome. Conclusion: There was no evidence of a negative impact of anticancer therapies on COVID-19 outcomes. Timely end-of-life communication as part of advanced care planning could save patients from prolonged suffering and decrease burden in intensive care units. Early discussion of treatment restrictions should therefore be part of routine oncological care, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic

Life-prolonging treatment restrictions and outcomes in patients with cancer and COVID-19: an update from the Dutch Oncology COVID-19 Consortium

Aim of the study: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted cancer care. In this study, clinical patient characteristics related to COVID-19 outcomes and advanced care planning, in terms of non-oncological treatment restrictions (e.g. do-not-resuscitate codes), were studied in patients with cancer and COVID-19. Methods: The Dutch Oncology COVID-19 Consortium registry was launched in March 2020 in 45 hospitals in the Netherlands, primarily to identify risk factors of a severe COVID-19 outcome in patients with cancer. Here, an updated analysis of the registry was performed, and treatment restrictions (e.g. do-not-intubate codes) were studied in relation to COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer. Oncological treatment restrictions were not taken into account. Results: Between 27th March 2020 and 4th February 2021, 1360 patients with cancer and COVID-19 were registered. Follow-up data of 830 patients could be validated for this analysis. Overall, 230 of 830 (27.7%) patients died of COVID-19, and 60% of the remaining 600 patients with resolved COVID-19 were admitted to the hospital. Patients with haematological malignancies or lung cancer had a higher risk of a fatal outcome than other solid tumours. No correlation between anticancer therapies and the risk of a fatal COVID-19 outcome was found. In terms of end-of-life communication, 50% of all patients had restrictions regarding life-prolonging treatment (e.g. do-not-intubate codes). Most identified patients with treatment restrictions had risk factors associated with fatal COVID-19 outcome. Conclusion: There was no evidence of a negative impact of anticancer therapies on COVID-19 outcomes. Timely end-of-life communication as part of advanced care planning could save patients from prolonged suffering and decrease burden in intensive care units. Early discussion of treatment restrictions should therefore be part of routine oncological care, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic