27 research outputs found

    Defining gentrification for epidemiologic research: A systematic review.

    No full text
    Neighborhoods have a profound impact on individual health. There is growing interest in the role of dynamic changes to neighborhoods-including gentrification-on the health of residents. However, research on the association between gentrification and health is limited, partly due to the numerous definitions used to define gentrification. This article presents a systematic review of the current state of literature describing the association between gentrification and health. In addition, it provides a novel framework for addressing important next steps in this research. A total of 1393 unique articles were identified, 122 abstracts were reviewed, and 36 articles published from 2007-2020 were included. Of the 36 articles, 9 were qualitative, 24 were quantitative, and 3 were review papers. There was no universally accepted definition of gentrification; definitions often used socioeconomic variables describing demographics, housing, education, and income. Health outcomes associated with gentrification included self-reported health, preterm birth, mental health conditions, alcohol use, psychosocial factors, and health care utilization, though the direction of this association varied. The results of this review also suggest that the impact of gentrification on health is not uniform across populations. For example, marginalized populations, such as Black residents and the elderly, were impacted more than White and younger residents. In addition, we identified multiples gaps in the research, including the need for a conceptual model, future mechanistic studies, and interventions

    Salvage radiotherapy for rising or persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of salvage radiotherapy (RT) for a persistent or rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy, and to identify the pretreatment factors that may predict for patients likely to benefit from this treatment. METHODS: Seventy-three consecutive patients were treated during a 10-year period (1989 to 1999) with RT after radical prostatectomy. Twelve patients were excluded from analysis because of either an undetectable PSA level before RT or lack of follow-up data. No patients had clinical or radiographic evidence of distant disease. An undetectable PSA level (less than 0.1 ng/mL) was required to be considered disease free. RESULTS: The median PSA level before RT was 0.8 ng/mL (range 0.1 to 63). The median radiation dose prescribed was 66.6 Gy. The actuarial PSA-free survival rate at 4 years was 39%. Failure was uncommon in patients followed up beyond 4 years. Univariate analysis revealed that a pre-RT PSA level of less than 1.0 ng/mL (P = 0.001), Gleason score less than 8 (P = 0.003), and achievement of an undetectable PSA level after prostatectomy (P = 0.018) were significant predictors of improved disease-free survival. On multivariate analysis, both a pre-RT PSA level of less than 1.0 ng/mL and a Gleason score less than 8 maintained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage RT provides a reasonable chance of intermediate-term disease-free survival in patients with PSA persistence or relapse after radical prostatectomy. Patients with a higher PSA level (greater than 1 ng/mL) and Gleason score of 8 or more are less likely to benefit from this treatment, and improved therapies are needed for this subset of patients. Patients should be referred promptly for salvage RT after detection of relapse

    Prevalence and predictors of no-shows to physical therapy for musculoskeletal conditions.

    No full text
    ObjectivesChronic pain affects 50 million Americans and is often treated with non-pharmacologic approaches like physical therapy. Developing a no-show prediction model for individuals seeking physical therapy care for musculoskeletal conditions has several benefits including enhancement of workforce efficiency without growing the existing provider pool, delivering guideline adherent care, and identifying those that may benefit from telehealth. The objective of this paper was to quantify the national prevalence of no-shows for patients seeking physical therapy care and to identify individual and organizational factors predicting whether a patient will be a no-show when seeking physical therapy care.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingCommercial provider of physical therapy within the United States with 828 clinics across 26 states.ParticipantsAdolescent and adult patients (age cutoffs: 14-117 years) seeking non-pharmacological treatment for musculoskeletal conditions from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017 (n = 542,685). Exclusion criteria were a primary complaint not considered an MSK condition or improbable values for height, weight, or body mass index values. The study included 444,995 individuals.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrevalence of no-shows for musculoskeletal conditions and predictors of patient no-show.ResultsIn our population, 73% missed at least 1 appointment for a given physical therapy care episode. Our model had moderate discrimination for no-shows (c-statistic:0.72, all appointments; 0.73, first 7 appointments) and was well calibrated, with predicted and observed no-shows in good agreement. Variables predicting higher no-show rates included insurance type; smoking-status; higher BMI; and more prior cancellations, time between visit and scheduling date, and between current and previous visit.ConclusionsThe high prevalence of no-shows when seeking care for musculoskeletal conditions from physical therapists highlights an inefficiency that, unaddressed, could limit delivery of guideline-adherent care that advocates for earlier use of non-pharmacological treatments for musculoskeletal conditions and result in missed opportunities for using telehealth to deliver physical therapy

    Comparison of Measured GFR, Serum Creatinine, Cystatin C, and Beta-Trace Protein to Predict ESRD in African Americans With Hypertensive CKD

    No full text
    Identification of persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are at highest risk to progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is necessary to reduce the burden of kidney failure. The relative utility of traditional markers of kidney function, including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine level, and emerging markers of kidney function, including cystatin C and beta-trace protein (BTP) levels, to predict ESRD and mortality has yet to be established. Randomized clinical trial followed by an observational cohort study. 865 African American individuals with hypertensive CKD enrolled in a clinical trial of 2 levels of blood pressure control and 3 different antihypertensive drugs as initial therapy and subsequently followed by an observational cohort study. Quintile of measured GFR (mGFR) by iothalamate clearance, serum creatinine, serum creatinine–based eGFR, cystatin C, and BTP values. Incidence of ESRD and mortality. 246 participants reached ESRD during a median follow-up of 102 months. The incidence rate of ESRD was higher with higher quintiles of each marker. The association between higher BTP level and ESRD was stronger than those for the other markers, including mGFR. All markers remained significantly associated with ESRD after adjustment for mGFR and relevant covariates (all P < 0.05), with BTP level retaining the strongest association (HR for highest vs lowest quintile, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.2-14.9). Associations with the combined end point of ESRD or mortality (n = 390) were weaker, but remained significant for cystatin C ( P = 0.05) and BTP levels ( P = 0.004). The ability of these markers to predict ESRD and mortality in other racial and ethnic groups and in individuals with CKD due to other causes is unknown. Plasma BTP and cystatin C levels may be useful adjuncts to serum creatinine level and mGFR in evaluating risk of progression of kidney disease

    Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration is positively associated with rate of disease reclassification on subsequent active surveillance prostate biopsy in men with low PSA density

    Full text link
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration at active surveillance (AS) entry and disease reclassification on subsequent AS biopsy ('biopsy reclassification') in men with low PSA density (PSAD). To investigate whether a clinically meaningful PSA threshold for AS eligibility/ineligibility for men with low PSAD can be identified based on risk of subsequent biopsy reclassification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included men enrolled in the Johns Hopkins AS Study (JHAS) who had a PSAD of <0.15 ng/mL/g (640 men). We estimated the incidence rates (IRs; per 100 person years) and hazard ratios (HR) of biopsy reclassification (Gleason score ≥ 7, any Gleason pattern 4 or 5, ≥3 positive cores, or ≥50% cancer involvement/biopsy core) for categories of serum PSA concentration at the time of entry into AS. We generated predicted IRs using Poisson regression to adjust for age and prostate volume, mean percentage free PSA (ratio of free to total PSA) and maximum percentage biopsy core involvement with cancer. RESULTS: The unadjusted IRs (per 100 person years) of biopsy reclassification across serum PSA concentration at entry into JHAS showed, in general, an increase; however, the pattern was not linear with higher IRs in the group ≥ 4 to <6 ng/mL (14.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.8-17.2%) when compared with ≥6 to <8 ng/mL (8.4, 95% CI 5.7-12.3%) but almost similar IRs when compared with the group ≥ 8 to <10 ng/mL (14.8, 95% CI 8.4-26.1%). The adjusted predicted IRs of reclassification showed a similar non-linear increase in IRs, whereby the rates around 4 ng/mL were similar to the rates around 10 ng/mL. CONCLUSION: Risk for biopsy reclassification increased non-linearly across PSA concentration in men with low PSAD, whereby no obvious clinically meaningful threshold could be identified. This information could be incorporated into decision-making for AS. However, longer follow-up times are needed to warrant final conclusions

    Do You PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)? Physical Function and Pain Interference Scores After Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

    No full text
    Background: Physical function and pain outcomes vary after arthroplasty. We investigated differences in postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to identify preoperative factors that predict postoperative PROMIS scores. Methods: Patients who underwent TKA and THA from 2014-2020 were eligible. Preoperative variables including demographics, comorbidities, and pain scores were obtained from the medical record. Patients completed surveys measuring postoperative PF and PI. Descriptive statistics and separate linear regression models for each anatomical location were performed to examine factors predicting postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores. Results: Surveys were completed by 2411 patients (19.5% response rate). Unadjusted mean PF postoperative scores were 47.2 for TKA and 48.8 for THA. Preoperative predictors of lower PF included female sex; body mass index and comorbidities for TKA and THA; and age, tobacco use, and non-White race for THA. Mean PI scores were 47.9 for THA and 49.0 for TKA. Preoperative predictors of increased PI included non-White race and increased body mass index for TKA and THA; higher preoperative pain for TKA; and female sex and increased comorbidity for THA. Conclusions: Postoperative PROMIS scores were similar for TKA and THA, with THA having slightly higher PF and lower PI scores. Regression models using preoperative variables showed similar performance for TKA compared with THA. These findings suggest areas for future development of clinical decision support tools
    corecore