Liver involvement and mortality in COVID-19: A retrospective analysis from the CORACLE study group

INTRODUCTION: liver abnormalities are common in COVID-19 patients and associated with higher morbidity and mortality. We aimed to investigate clinical significance and effect on the mortality of abnormal liver function tests (ALFTs) in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: we retrospectively evaluated in a multicentre study all patients admitted with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. RESULTS: 434 patients were included in this analysis. Among overall patients, 311 (71.6%) had normal baseline ALT levels. 123 patients showed overall abnormal liver function tests (ALFTs) at baseline [101 ALFTs <2x UNL and 22 ≥2 UNL]. Overall in-hospital mortality was 14% and mean duration of hospitalization was 10.5 days. Hypertension (50.5%), cardiovascular diseases (39.6%), diabetes (23%) were frequent comorbidities and 53.7% of patients had ARDS. At multivariate analysis, the presence of ARDS at baseline (OR=6.11; 95% CI: 3.03–12.32; p<0.000); cardiovascular diseases (OR=4; 95% CI: 2.05–7.81; p<0.000); dementia (OR=3.93; 95%CI:1.87–8.26; p<0.000) and no smoking (OR=4.6; 95% CI: 1.45–14.61; p=0.010) resulted significantly predictive of in-hospital mortality. The presence of ALFTs at baseline was not significantly associated with mortality (OR=3.44; 95% CI=0.81–14.58; p=0.094). CONCLUSION: ALFTs was frequently observed in COVID-19 patients, but the overall in-hospital mortality was mainly determined by the severity of illness, comorbidities and presence of ARDS

Role of Oritavancin in the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis, Catheter- or Device-Related Infections, Bloodstream Infections, and Bone and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Humans: Narrative Review and Possible Developments

Oritavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with in vitro activity against Gram-positive pathogens, as well as good bactericidal activity and sterilisation ability in biofilm. It has been approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but recent reports have demonstrated possible off-label uses, such as for vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), deep-seated infections including those involving prosthetic material and invasive infections. The aim of this work is to review the uses of oritavancin outside of ABSSSI, focusing on its real-life applications on infective endocarditis, catheter- or device-related infections, bloodstream infections, and bone and prosthetic joint infections in humans, as well as possible future applications. We performed a narrative review, collecting the literature published between 1 December 2002 and 1 November 2022 on PubMed and the Cochrane Library using the term ‘oritavancin’. Available studies have shown how effective it is in different settings, suggesting an opportunity for step-down strategies or outpatient management of infections requiring a long duration of antibiotic treatment. So far, evidence is still scarce, and limited to a few studies and case reports, mostly focusing on Staphylococcus aureus as the major isolate. Concerns about fluid intake for dilution and interaction with coagulation markers also need to be taken into account. Further studies are required in order to assess the safety and effectiveness of Oritavancin in vascular, prosthetic, or device-related infections, as well as in resistant Gram-positive bacteria or enterococcal infections

Predictors of Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 Infection in Different Health- Care Settings: A Retrospective Analysis from a CORACLE Study Group

BACKGROUND: Despite the large number of hospitalized patients affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, few data are available about risk factors and mortality in subjects with nosocomially acquired respiratory infection of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated in a multicentric study -during the pre-vaccination era-all patients admitted with confirmed diagnosis of nosocomial COVID-19 (NC). Patients were classified according to provenance: hospital-acquired NC or long-term care (LTC) facilities. RESULTS: Among overall 1047 patients evaluated with COVID-19, 137 had a confirmed diagnosis of NC (13%). 78 (56.9%) patients had hospital-acquired NC and 59 (43%) had LTC NC. Overall mortality was 35.8%, in hospital-acquired NC 24.4%, in LTC NC 50.8% (p<0.001) (Log Rank test: p=0.001). Timing of diagnosis was significantly different between hospital acquired and LTC NC (3.5 vs 10 days, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis age, intensive-care unit admission, LTC provenance and sepsis were significant predictors of mortality in patients with NC infection. CONCLUSION: Patients with NC are at higher risk of mortality (especially for LTC NC) and required preventive strategies, early diagnosis, and treatment to avoid COVID-19 cluster

The Diagnostic Relevance of &beta;-D-Glucan for Candidemia within Internal Medicine Wards

Candidemia diagnosis is based on the combination of clinical, microbiological and laboratory data. We aimed to evaluate performances and accuracy of (1,3)-&beta;-D-glucan (BDG) at various cut-offs in internal medicine patients. An observational retrospective&ndash;prospective study was performed. Patients with at least two determinations of BDG and paired, associated blood cultures within &plusmn;48 h were considered. A total of 140 patients were included: 26 with Candida spp. blood-stream infections (BSI) and 114 without candidemia. Patients with candidemia were older and had higher BDG values, need of parenteral nutrition, higher colonization by Candida in more than one site, presence of percutaneous gastrostomy and higher Candida or Charlson scores. BDG maintained the best compromise between sensitivity, specificity and optimal negative predictive value was 150 pg/mL. BDG values at cut-off of 150 pg/mL increase the strength of association between BDG and development of candidemia (Odds Ratio&mdash;OR 5.58; CI 2.48&ndash;12.53 vs. OR 1.06; CI 1.003&ndash;1.008). Analyzing BDG &gt; 150 pg/mL along with Candida score &gt; 2 and Charlson score &gt; 4, the strength of the association amongst BDG, clinical scores and development of candidemia is increased. The overall clinical evaluation with the help of scores that consider BDG values &gt; 150 pg/mL, Candida score &gt; 2 and Charlson score &gt; 4 in combination seems to predict better the need of antifungal empiric treatment

An Observational Study of MDR Hospital-Acquired Infections and Antibiotic Use during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Call for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

The pandemic caused by the COVID-19 virus has required major adjustments to healthcare systems, especially to infection control and antimicrobial stewardship. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and antibiotic consumption during the three waves of COVID-19 and to compare it to the period before the outbreak at Molinette Hospital, located in the City of Health and Sciences, a 1200-bed teaching hospital with surgical, medical, and intensive care units. We demonstrated an increase in MDR infections: particularly in K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp), A. baumannii, and MRSA. Fluoroquinolone use showed a significant increasing trend in the pre-COVID period but saw a significant reduction in the COVID period. The use of fourth- and fifth-generation cephalosporins and piperacillin&ndash;tazobactam increased at the beginning of the COVID period. Our findings support the need for restoring stewardship and infection control practices, specifically source control, hygiene, and management of invasive devices. In addition, our data reveal the need for improved microbiological diagnosis to guide appropriate treatment and prompt infection control during pandemics. Despite the infection control practices in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, invasive procedures in critically ill patients and poor source control still increase the risk of HAIs caused by MDR organisms

<i>Legionella pneumophila</i> Infections during a 7-Year Retrospective Analysis (2016–2022): Epidemiological, Clinical Features and Outcomes in Patients with Legionnaires’ Disease

Legionella pneumophila (LP) is one of the main causative agents of community-acquired pneumonia in Europe and its fifth bacterial cause in Italy (4.9%). We conducted a seven year retrospective analysis of LP infection serogroup 1 in Asti, Piedmont, between 2016 and 2022. Patients were included if they tested positive for the Legionella urinary antigen. Clinical, laboratory, and radiologic data were analyzed to describe the risk factors for mortality. Fifty patients with LD were collected, mainly male, with a median age of 69 years. The main comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases (50%), pulmonary diseases (26%), and neurological diseases (12%). The most common clinical presentations were fever, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and neurologic symptoms. Older age (p = 0.004), underlying cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.009), late diagnosis at admission (p = 0.035), and neurological symptoms at diagnosis (p = 0.046) were more common in the non-survivor group. Moreover, a septic-shock presentation or the need for non-invasive ventilation at admission were associated with a higher mortality. No considerable differences in the biochemical data were found between the two groups except for the median neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and PCT value. We did not find any differences in mortality related to the choice of antibiotic regimen. Differences in outcome were associated with the median duration of treatment (p =< 0.001) but not to the choice of antibiotic regimen (mainly levofloxacin or azithromycin). In conclusion, early individuation of the wide spectrum of clinical characteristics of LP infection such as respiratory, cardiac, and neurological manifestations of the patient’s comorbidities, and significant biochemical data should help clinicians flag high risk patients and potentially improve their outcome

Ten Years of KPC-Kp Bloodstream Infections Experience: Impact of Early Appropriate Empirical Therapy on Mortality

Background. In K. pneumoniae KPC (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSI), INCREMENT CPE score &gt;7, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) &ge;3 and septic shock are recognized predictors of mortality, with a possible beneficial effect of combination therapy in seriously ill patients. Materials and Methods. We conducted a ten-year retrospective study including all KPC-Kp BSI in patients &ge;18 years of age with the aim to evaluate the characteristics and impact of appropriate empirical therapy, either monotherapy or combination therapy, and targeted therapy on mortality. Appropriate therapy was defined as at least one active antimicrobial agent with in vitro activity against KPC-kp demonstrated by susceptibility testing, administered within 48 h from blood culture collection. Results. The median age of the 435 analyzed patients was 66.09 years (IQR 54.87&ndash;73.98). The median CCI was 4. KPC-Kp colonization was present in 324 patients (74.48%). The probable origin of the KPC-Kp BSI was not identified in 136 patients (31.26%), whereas in 120 (27.59%) patients, it was CVC-related, and in 118 (27.13%), it was respiratory. Source control was achieved in 87 patients (72.5%) with CVC-related KPC-Kp BSI. The twenty-eight-day survival was 70.45% for empirical monotherapy, 63.88% for empirical combination therapy and 57.05% for targeted therapy (p = 0.0399). A probable source of KPC-Kp BSI other than urinary, CVC or abdominal [aHR 1.64 (IC 1.15&ndash;2.34) p = 0.006] and deferred targeted therapy [HR 1.67 (IC 1.12&ndash;2.51), p= 0.013] emerged as predictors of mortality, whereas source control [HR 0.62 (IC 0.44&ndash;0.86), p = 0.005] and ceftazidime/avibactam administration in empirical therapy [aHR 0.37 (IC 0.20&ndash;0.68) p = 0.002] appeared as protective factors. Discussion. These data underline the importance of source control together with timing appropriateness in the early start of empirical therapy over the choice of monotherapy or combination therapy and the use of ceftazidime/avibactam against KPC-Kp BSI

A Regional Observational Study on COVID-19-Associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CAPA) within Intensive Care Unit: Trying to Break the Mold

The reported incidence of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) ranges between 2.4% and 35% in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and awareness in the medical community is rising. We performed a regional retrospective observational study including patients diagnosed with CAPA defined according to the Modified AspICU Dutch/Belgian Mycosis Study Group and CAPA–EECMM, from five different ICUs, admitted between March, 2020 and September, 2021. Forty-five patients were included. The median age was 64 (IQR 60–72), mostly (73%) males. At ICU admission, the median Charlson comorbidity index was 3 (2–5), and the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS)-II score was 42 (31–56). The main underlying diseases were hypertension (46%), diabetes (36%) and pulmonary diseases (15%). CAPA was diagnosed within a median of 17 days (IQR 10–21.75) after symptoms onset and 9 days (IQR 3–11) after ICU admission. The overall 28-day mortality rate was 58%, and at univariate analysis, it was significantly associated with older age (p = 0.009) and SAPS-II score at admission (p = 0.032). The use of immunomodulatory agents, p = 0.061; broad-spectrum antibiotics, p = 0.091; positive culture for Aspergillus on BAL, p = 0.065; and hypertension, p = 0.083, were near reaching statistical significance. None of them were confirmed in multivariate analysis. In critically ill COVID-19 patients, CAPA acquired clinical relevance in terms of incidence and reported mortality. However, the risk between underdiagnosis—in the absence of specific invasive investigations, and with a consequent possible increase in mortality—and over-diagnosis (case identification with galactomannan on broncho-alveolar fluid alone) might be considered. Realistic incidence rates, based on local, real-life epidemiological data, might be helpful in guiding clinicians