Process evaluation of a behavioral weight loss intervention for low-income, mid-life women in local health departments: the Weight-Wise II Program

Few studies have examined the translation of evidence based weight loss interventions into public health settings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the process of implementation and public health impact of the Weight-Wise II Program. In aim 1, we conducted a process evaluation of the Weight-Wise II Program in 6 local health departments. Measures of participant enactment and program acceptability were associated with weight loss: group session attendance (p<.0001), frequency of maintaining food and fitness diaries (p<.0001), and program satisfaction (p=.05). In addition, we developed checklists to measure the content, quality and accuracy of program content delivery. The results of this study suggest that staff found acceptable the implementation of an intensive behavioral weight loss program in health departments and low-income, mid-life women actively engaged in a weight loss program offered through their local health department. In aim 2, we assessed the public health impact using the RE-AIM framework. We created summary indices to compare the program across sites. Results indicate that there were some differences in implementation (e.g. quality and comprehensiveness of delivery and group session duration) between interventionists with previous weight management experience compared to those without. In Aim 3, we assessed North Carolina local health department (n=55) capacity to implement intensive behavioral weight loss programs. Although we found that health departments have the staff who typically deliver behavioral weight loss programs, there is more to learn regarding health department's capacity to deliver such programs. The results of this dissertation suggest that an intensive behavioral weight loss program can be successfully implemented in local health departments and comprehensively evaluated.Doctor of Philosoph

Patterns of beverages consumed and risk of incident kidney disease

© 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology. Background and objectives Selected beverages, such as sugar-sweetened beverages, have been reported to influence kidney disease risk, although previous studies have been inconsistent. Further research is necessary to comprehensively evaluate all types of beverages in association with CKD risk to better inform dietary guidelines. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We conducted a prospective analysis in the Jackson Heart Study, a cohort of black men and women in Jackson, Mississippi. Beverage intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire administered at baseline (2000–2004). Incident CKD was defined as onset of eGFR\u3c60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and ≥30% eGFR decline at follow-up (2009–13) relative to baseline among those with baseline eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between the consumption of each individual beverage, beverage patterns, and incident CKD. Beverage patterns were empirically derived using principal components analysis, in which components were created on the basis of the linear combinations of beverages consumed. Results Among 3003 participants, 185 (6%) developed incident CKD over a median follow-up of 8 years. At baseline, mean age was 54 (SD 12) years, 64% were women, and mean eGFR was 98 (SD 18) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . After adjusting for total energy intake, age, sex, education, body mass index, smoking, physical activity, hypertension, diabetes, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, history of cardiovascular disease, and baseline eGFR, a principal components analysis–derived beverage pattern consisting of higher consumption of soda, sweetened fruit drinks, and water was associated with significantly greater odds of incident CKD (odds ratio tertile 3 versus 1 =1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.41). Conclusions Higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with an elevated risk of subsequent CKD in this community-based cohort of black Americans

The American Heart Association Ideal Cardiovascular Health and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Among Blacks: The Jackson Heart Study

Background: The concept of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH), defined by the American Heart Association primarily for coronary heart disease and stroke prevention, may apply to diabetes mellitus prevention among blacks. Methods and Results: Our sample included 2668 adults in the Jackson Heart Study with complete baseline data on 6 of 7 American Heart Association CVH metrics (body mass index, healthy diet, smoking, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and physical activity). Incident diabetes mellitus was defined as fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, physician diagnosis, use of diabetes mellitus drugs, or glycosylated hemoglobin ≥6.5%. A summary CVH score from 0 to 6, based on presence/absence of ideal CVH metrics, was derived for each participant. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios. Mean age was 55 years (65% women) with 492 incident diabetes mellitus events over 7.6 years (24.6 cases/1000 person‐years). Three quarters of participants had only 1 or 2 ideal CVH metrics; no participant had all 6. After adjustment for demographic factors (age, sex, education, and income) and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein, each additional ideal CVH metric was associated with a 17% diabetes mellitus risk reduction (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74–0.93). The association was attenuated with further adjustment for homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79–1.00). Compared with participants with 1 or no ideal CVH metric, diabetes mellitus risk was 15% and 37% lower in those with 2 and ≥3 ideal CVH metrics, respectively. Conclusions: The AHA concept of ideal CVH is applicable to diabetes mellitus prevention among blacks. These associations were largely explained by insulin resistance

Translation of a behavioral weight loss intervention for mid‐life, low‐income women in local health departments

Objective: To translate a behavioral weight loss intervention for mid-life, low-income women in real world settings. Design and Methods: In this pragmatic clinical trial, we randomly selected six North Carolina county health departments and trained their current staff to deliver a 16-session evidence-based behavioral weight loss intervention (special intervention, SI). SI weight loss outcomes were compared to a delayed intervention (DI) control group. Results: Of 432 women expressing interest, 189 completed baseline measures and were randomized within health departments to SI (N = 126) or DI (N = 63). At baseline, average age was 51 years, 53% were African American, mean weight was 100 kg, and BMI averaged 37 kg/m(2). A total of 96 (76%) SI and 55 (87%) DI participants returned for 5-month follow-up measures. The crude weight change was -3.1 kg in the SI and -0.4 kg in the DI group, for a difference of 2.8 kg (95% CI 1.4 to 4.1, p = 0.0001). Diet quality and physical activity improved significantly more in the SI group, and estimated intervention costs were $327 per participant. Conclusion: This pragmatic short‐term weight loss intervention targeted to low‐income mid‐life women yielded meaningful weight loss when translated to the county health department setting.Keywords: US, Primary care, Risk factors, Obesity, Management, Adults, Physical activity, Rural communities, Clinical trial, Randomized tria

Abstract P129: Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalization or Death by the AHA's Life’s Essential 8: The Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R)

Abstract only Background: It is unknown how cardiovascular health (CVH) relates to severe Covid-19 illness in adults without clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD). We hypothesized that more optimal Life’s Essential 8 (LE8)-quantified CVH is associated with lower risk of severe Covid-19 among US adults without clinical CVD. Methods: C4R is ascertaining Covid-19 events in 14 NIH cohorts via questionnaires, serosurvey, and medical record adjudication. We included cohorts with pre-pandemic LE8 measures of body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), lipids, diet, glucose, physical activity, smoking, and sleep in participants without clinical CVD. Covid-19 was defined as severe (hospitalization, death) or non-severe (all other events). Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard models compared incident Covid-19 by LE8 quartiles, with non-severe and severe Covid-19 as competing risks. Models were censored at first event, stratified by cohort, and adjusted for sociodemographics and vaccinations at time of Covid-19. Results: Among 21,300 participants in 7 cohorts (mean [SD] age 67 years [14], 61% female, 2% American Indian, 4% Asian, 16% Black, 33% White, 43% Hispanic), mean (SD) LE8 was 65 (14). In 3/2020-9/2022, there were 3,034 non-severe and 488 severe Covid-19 cases. The best CVH quartile (Q) 4 had more non-severe and fewer severe Covid-19 events. The Q4 vs. Q1 aHR was 1.08 (95% CI 0.98, 1.20) for non-severe Covid-19 and 0.59 (0.45, 0.77) for severe Covid-19. Examining LE8 components separately, better status on 5 LE8 components (BMI, BP, glucose, physical activity, smoking) was associated with significantly lower risk of severe Covid-19, whereas 3 were not associated (cholesterol, diet, sleep; data not shown). Conclusions: Better LE8-quantified CVH was associated with 41% lower risk of severe Covid-19 events in adults without clinical CVD. Further research is needed to elucidate mechanisms of Covid-19 resilience and the role of CVH-directed interventions to reduce risks of severe Covid-19