10 research outputs found

    Interference in point-of-care international normalized ratio monitoring in patients with lupus anticoagulant is correlated with anti–β2-glycoprotein I antibody titers

    Get PDF
    Background: Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) receive anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to prevent recurrent thrombosis. VKA treatment requires strict monitoring with an international normalized ratio (INR). It is known that lupus anticoagulants (LAs) can lead to elevated INR results with point-of-care-testing (POCT) devices, which could result in inadequate adaptation of anticoagulant therapy. Objective: To determine discrepancies between POCT-INR and laboratory-INR in patients who are LA-positive on VKA therapy. Methods: Paired INR testing was performed with 1 POCT device (CoaguChek XS) and 2 laboratory assays (Owren and Quick method) in 33 patients with LA-positive APS on VKA in a single-center cross-sectional study. Patients were tested for anti–β2-glycoprotein I, anticardiolipin, and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM antibodies. Agreement between assays was evaluated with Spearman's correlation, Lin's correlation coefficient, and Bland–Altman plots. Agreement limits were considered satisfactory if differences were ≤20% as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Results: We found poor agreement between POCT-INR and laboratory-INR based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26-0.55) between POCT-INR and Owren-INR, a ρc of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47-0.76) between POCT-INR and Quick-INR, and a ρc of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) between Quick-INR and Owren-INR. High anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG antibody titers correlated with INR disagreement between POCT-INR and laboratory-INR. Conclusion: There is a disagreement between INR values measured with the CoaguChek XS and laboratory-INR in a proportion of patients with LA. Consequently, laboratory-INR monitoring should be preferred over POCT-INR monitoring in patients with LA-positive APS, especially in patients with high anti-β2-glycoprotein IgG antibody titers

    Anti-β2-glycoprotein I and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies interfere with cleavage of factor V(a) by activated protein C

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The acquired thrombotic risk factor known as lupus anticoagulant (LA) interferes with laboratory clotting assays and can be caused by autoantibodies against β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) and prothrombin. LA is associated with activated protein C (APC) resistance, which might contribute to thrombotic risk in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. How antibodies against β2GPI and prothrombin cause APC resistance is currently unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate how anti-β2GPI and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (PS/PT) antibodies induce APC resistance. METHODS: The effects of anti-β2GPI and anti-PS/PT antibodies on APC resistance were studied in plasma (of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome) and with purified coagulation factors and antibodies. RESULTS: APC resistance was observed in LA-positive patients with anti-β2GPI or anti-PS/PT antibodies and in normal plasma spiked with monoclonal anti-β2GPI or anti-PS/PT antibodies with LA activity. Analysis of factor (F)V cleavage patterns after APC incubation indicated that anti-β2GPI antibodies attenuated APC-mediated FV cleavage at R506 and R306. APC-mediated cleavage at R506 is required for FV cofactor activity during inactivation of FVIIIa. Assays with purified coagulation factors confirmed that anti-β2GPI antibodies interfered with the cofactor function of FV during FVIIIa inactivation but not with FVa inactivation. Anti-PS/PT antibodies attenuated APC-mediated FVa and FVIIIa inactivation. Analysis of FV(a) cleavage patterns after APC incubation indicated that anti-PS/PT antibodies interfere with APC-mediated cleavage of FV at positions R506 and R306. CONCLUSION: Anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA activity contribute to a procoagulant state by causing APC resistance via interference with the cofactor function of FV during FVIIIa inactivation. LA-causing anti-PS/PT antibodies interfere with the anticoagulant function of APC by preventing FV(a) cleavage

    Explaining Lupus Anticoagulant in Thrombotic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

    Full text link
    The acquired thrombotic risk factor known as lupus anticoagulant (LA) is detected as a phospholipid-dependent prolongation of the clotting time and is the most clinically relevant antiphospholipid antibody within the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). LA can be caused by autoantibodies against β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) or prothrombin. The association of LA with thrombosis represents a paradox, as prolonged clotting times are normally indicative for a bleeding tendency. The aim of this thesis was to gain more insight into the thrombotic mechanism of LA-causing antiphospholipid antibodies and to investigate how these antibodies interfere with coagulation assays. In Chapter 2, we described how anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies interfere in coagulation assays leading to the LA phenomenon. We showed that anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause LA through different mechanisms of action: while anti-β2GPI antibodies interfere with Factor V activation by Factor Xa through a direct interaction with FV, anti-prothrombin antibodies compete with FXa for phospholipid binding sites. In Chapter 3, we focused on the other part of the LA paradox by looking into the effect of anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies on the pro-thrombotic mechanism of activated protein C (APC) resistance. We showed that anti-β2GPI antibodies with LA-activity cause APC resistance via interference with the cofactor function of FV during Factor VIIIa inactivation. LA-causing anti-prothrombin antibodies interfere with the anticoagulant function of APC by preventing FV(a) cleavage. In Chapter 4, we further elaborated on the prothrombotic mechanisms of anti-β2GPI antibodies. We showed that these antibodies interfere with the anticoagulant function of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) resulting in increased thrombin formation. In Chapter 5, we focused on LA in clinical settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic many patients with COVID-19 who were submitted to intensive care units (ICU) developed thrombosis. LA was frequently observed in these patients. We studied the association of LA with thrombosis in a cohort of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU. We found high prevalence of LA and other antiphospholipid antibodies in these patients. And importantly, LA, as measured on admission to ICU, was strongly associated with thrombosis in critically ill COVID-19 patients, especially in patients <65 years of age. In Chapter 6, we discussed the interference of LA with international normalized ratio (INR). APS patients receive anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to prevent recurrent thrombosis. As the use of VKA imposes considerable bleeding risks, it requires strict monitoring with INR. It is known that LA can lead to elevated INR values with point-of-care-testing (POCT) devices which could result in inadequate adaptation of anticoagulant therapy. We found discrepancies between the standard POCT device used in the Netherlands (Coaguchek XS) and two laboratory-INR methods (Owren and Quick). We showed that elevated anti-β2GPI IgG antibodies are more frequently observed in patients with deviating POCT-INR results. In conclusion, we gained more insight into how anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies influence both procoagulant and anticoagulant pathways. The coming years will hopefully show more progress into the complete understanding of the thrombotic mechanism underlying APS together with the development of targeted therapy for patients with thrombotic APS

    Lupus anticoagulant associates with thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units: A retrospective cohort study

    Get PDF
    Background: Thrombosis is a frequent and severe complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a strong acquired risk factor for thrombosis in various diseases and is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19. Whether LA is associated with thrombosis in patients with severe COVID-19 is currently unclear. Objective: To investigate if LA is associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients/Methods: The presence of LA and other antiphospholipid antibodies was assessed in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. LA was determined with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents. Results: Of 169 patients with COVID-19, 116 (69%) tested positive for at least one antiphospholipid antibody upon admission to the ICU. Forty (24%) patients tested positive for LA; of whom 29 (17%) tested positive with a dRVVT, 19 (11%) tested positive with an LA-sensitive aPTT, and 8 (5%) tested positive on both tests. Fifty-eight (34%) patients developed thrombosis after ICU admission. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with LA based on a dRVVT was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.7), which increased to 4.5 (95% CI, 1.4–14.3) in patients at or below the median age in this study (64 years). LA positivity based on a dRVVT or LA-sensitive aPTT was only associated with thrombosis in patients aged less than 65 years (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3–11.4) and disappeared after adjustment for C-reactive protein. Conclusion: Lupus anticoagulant on admission is strongly associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19, especially in patients aged less than 65 years

    Anti-β2-glycoprotein I and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause lupus anticoagulant through different mechanisms of action

    Get PDF
    Background: The presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) is an independent risk factor for thrombosis. This laboratory phenomenon is detected as a phospholipid-dependent prolongation of the clotting time and is caused by autoantibodies against beta2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI) or prothrombin. How these autoantibodies cause LA is unclear. Objective: To elucidate how anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause the LA phenomenon. Methods: The effects of monoclonal anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies on coagulation were analyzed in plasma and with purified coagulation factors. Results: Detection of LA caused by anti-β2GPI or anti-prothrombin antibodies required the presence of the procofactor factor V (FV) in plasma. LA effect disappeared when FV was replaced by activated FV (FVa), both in a model system and in patient plasma, although differences between anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies were observed. Further exploration of the effects of the antibodies on coagulation showed that the anti-β2GPI antibody attenuated FV activation by activated faxtor X (FXa), whereas the anti-prothrombin antibody did not. Binding studies showed that β2GPI--antibody complexes directly interacted with FV with high affinity. Anti-prothrombin complexes caused the LA phenomenon through competition for phospholipid binding sites with coagulation factors as reduced FXa binding to lipospheres was observed with flow cytometry in the presence of these antibodies. Conclusion: Anti-β2GPI and anti-prothrombin antibodies cause LA through different mechanisms of action: While anti-β2GPI antibodies interfere with FV activation by FXa through a direct interaction with FV, anti-prothrombin antibodies compete with FXa for phospholipid binding sites. These data provide leads for understanding the paradoxical association between thrombosis and a prolonged clotting time in the antiphospholipid syndrome

    Lupus anticoagulant associates with thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units:A retrospective cohort study

    Full text link
    Background: Thrombosis is a frequent and severe complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a strong acquired risk factor for thrombosis in various diseases and is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19. Whether LA is associated with thrombosis in patients with severe COVID-19 is currently unclear. Objective: To investigate if LA is associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients/Methods: The presence of LA and other antiphospholipid antibodies was assessed in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. LA was determined with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents. Results: Of 169 patients with COVID-19, 116 (69%) tested positive for at least one antiphospholipid antibody upon admission to the ICU. Forty (24%) patients tested positive for LA; of whom 29 (17%) tested positive with a dRVVT, 19 (11%) tested positive with an LA-sensitive aPTT, and 8 (5%) tested positive on both tests. Fifty-eight (34%) patients developed thrombosis after ICU admission. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with LA based on a dRVVT was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.7), which increased to 4.5 (95% CI, 1.4-14.3) in patients at or below the median age in this study (64 years). LA positivity based on a dRVVT or LA-sensitive aPTT was only associated with thrombosis in patients aged less than 65 years (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3-11.4) and disappeared after adjustment for C-reactive protein. Conclusion: Lupus anticoagulant on admission is strongly associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19, especially in patients aged less than 65 years

    Lupus anticoagulant associates with thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units: A retrospective cohort study

    Full text link
    Background: Thrombosis is a frequent and severe complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a strong acquired risk factor for thrombosis in various diseases and is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19. Whether LA is associated with thrombosis in patients with severe COVID-19 is currently unclear. Objective: To investigate if LA is associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients/Methods: The presence of LA and other antiphospholipid antibodies was assessed in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. LA was determined with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents. Results: Of 169 patients with COVID-19, 116 (69%) tested positive for at least one antiphospholipid antibody upon admission to the ICU. Forty (24%) patients tested positive for LA; of whom 29 (17%) tested positive with a dRVVT, 19 (11%) tested positive with an LA-sensitive aPTT, and 8 (5%) tested positive on both tests. Fifty-eight (34%) patients developed thrombosis after ICU admission. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with LA based on a dRVVT was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.7), which increased to 4.5 (95% CI, 1.4–14.3) in patients at or below the median age in this study (64 years). LA positivity based on a dRVVT or LA-sensitive aPTT was only associated with thrombosis in patients aged less than 65 years (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3–11.4) and disappeared after adjustment for C-reactive protein. Conclusion: Lupus anticoagulant on admission is strongly associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19, especially in patients aged less than 65 years

    Lupus anticoagulant associates with thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care units: A retrospective cohort study

    Full text link
    Background: Thrombosis is a frequent and severe complication in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is a strong acquired risk factor for thrombosis in various diseases and is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19. Whether LA is associated with thrombosis in patients with severe COVID-19 is currently unclear. Objective: To investigate if LA is associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Patients/Methods: The presence of LA and other antiphospholipid antibodies was assessed in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. LA was determined with dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents. Results: Of 169 patients with COVID-19, 116 (69%) tested positive for at least one antiphospholipid antibody upon admission to the ICU. Forty (24%) patients tested positive for LA; of whom 29 (17%) tested positive with a dRVVT, 19 (11%) tested positive with an LA-sensitive aPTT, and 8 (5%) tested positive on both tests. Fifty-eight (34%) patients developed thrombosis after ICU admission. The odds ratio (OR) for thrombosis in patients with LA based on a dRVVT was 2.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–5.7), which increased to 4.5 (95% CI, 1.4–14.3) in patients at or below the median age in this study (64 years). LA positivity based on a dRVVT or LA-sensitive aPTT was only associated with thrombosis in patients aged less than 65 years (OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.3–11.4) and disappeared after adjustment for C-reactive protein. Conclusion: Lupus anticoagulant on admission is strongly associated with thrombosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19, especially in patients aged less than 65 years
    corecore