1 research outputs found
Efficacy of Single-site versus Two-site Phacotrabeculectomy in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: A Prospective Cohort Study
Introduction: The prevalence of co-existing cataract and
glaucoma is increasing in the adult population. Combined
surgeries have become more popular. However, there is a
conflict over which technique provides the best Intraocular
Pressure (IOP) control with good postoperative outcomes.
Aim: To compare the efficacy of single-site versus two-site
phacotrabeculectomy with mitomycin-C in patients with Primary
Open-angle Glaucoma (POAG) and cataract.
Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was
conducted in the Department of Ophthalmology, S.V. Medical
College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, over a period of one year
from January 2019 to January 2020. A total of 50 cases of POAG coexisting with cataract were analysed in the present study. Twentyfive cases were included in each group (Group-1 and Group-2).
Phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy were both performed
through a superior scleral tunnel in the single-site approach.
The two-site method combines a superior trabeculectomy with
a temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification. A concentration of
0.2 mg/mL of MMC was applied in both groups for three minutes.
Patients were followed-up for three months after surgery to
evaluate Intraocular Pressure (IOP), the need for antiglaucoma
medication, and postoperative best-corrected Visual Acuity (VA).
Comparative analysis was done using the Student’s t-test, and a
p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Throughout the three-month duration, the patients were
monitored. In the single-site group, the average preoperative
IOP was 21.880±8.4079 mmHg, which significantly decreased
to 11.16±9.95 mmHg after three months (p<0.001). In the twosite group, the corresponding figures were 22.640±6.3040 and
10.8±1.19 mmHg, respectively (p<0.001), with no discernible
statistical distinction between the two groups (p=0.486). At the
final follow-up, the number of antiglaucoma medications was
0.24±0.5 in the single-site group compared to 0.16±0.24 in the
two-site group. The mean postoperative Best Corrected Visual
Acuity (BCVA) did not exhibit any significant variation between
the two groups. Furthermore, there was no disparity in the
occurrence rate of complications between the two groups.
Conclusion: Both single and two-site phacotrabeculectomy led
to a significant reduction in IOP and improvement in BCVA. The
final IOP was similar in the two procedures, although the twosite group needed less glaucoma medication. As both surgical
procedures are equally effective, the choice of procedure
remains at the discretion of the surgeon