Health Impairments in Children and Adolescents After Hospitalization for Acute COVID-19 or MIS-C

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate risk factors for postdischarge sequelae in children and adolescents hospitalized for acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). METHODS: Multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in 25 United States pediatric hospitals. Patients <21-years-old, hospitalized May 2020 to May 2021 for acute COVID-19 or MIS-C with follow-up 2 to 4 months after admission. We assessed readmissions, persistent symptoms or activity impairment, and new morbidities. Multivariable regression was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 358 eligible patients, 2 to 4 month survey data were available for 119 of 155 (76.8%) with acute COVID-19 and 160 of 203 (78.8%) with MIS-C. Thirteen (11%) patients with acute COVID-19 and 12 (8%) with MIS-C had a readmission. Thirty-two (26.9%) patients with acute COVID-19 had persistent symptoms (22.7%) or activity impairment (14.3%) and 48 (30.0%) with MIS-C had persistent symptoms (20.0%) or activity impairment (21.3%). For patients with acute COVID-19, persistent symptoms (aRR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04-1.59]) and activity impairment (aRR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.06-1.78]) were associated with more organ systems involved. Patients with MIS-C and pre-existing respiratory conditions more frequently had persistent symptoms (aRR, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.55-6.14]) and those with obesity more frequently had activity impairment (aRR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.35-4.69]). New morbidities were infrequent (9% COVID-19, 1% MIS-C). CONCLUSIONS: Over 1 in 4 children hospitalized with acute COVID-19 or MIS-C experienced persistent symptoms or activity impairment for at least 2 months. Patients with MIS-C and respiratory conditions or obesity are at higher risk of prolonged recovery

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Characteristics and Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With COVID-19 or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Admitted to U.S. ICUs

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used successfully to support adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related cardiac or respiratory failure refractory to conventional therapies. Comprehensive reports of children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2-related ECMO support for conditions, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and acute COVID-19, are needed. Design: Case series of patients from the Overcoming COVID-19 public health surveillance registry. SETTING: Sixty-three hospitals in 32 U.S. states reporting to the registry between March 15, 2020, and December 31, 2021. PATIENTS: Patients less than 21 years admitted to the ICU meeting Centers for Disease Control criteria for MIS-C or acute COVID-19. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The final cohort included 2,733 patients with MIS-C (n = 1,530; 37 [2.4%] requiring ECMO) or acute COVID-19 (n = 1,203; 71 [5.9%] requiring ECMO). ECMO patients in both groups were older than those without ECMO support (MIS-C median 15.4 vs 9.9 yr; acute COVID-19 median 15.3 vs 13.6 yr). The body mass index percentile was similar in the MIS-C ECMO versus no ECMO groups (89.9 vs 85.8; p = 0.22) but higher in the COVID-19 ECMO versus no ECMO groups (98.3 vs 96.5; p = 0.03). Patients on ECMO with MIS-C versus COVID-19 were supported more often with venoarterial ECMO (92% vs 41%) for primary cardiac indications (87% vs 23%), had ECMO initiated earlier (median 1 vs 5 d from hospitalization), shorter ECMO courses (median 3.9 vs 14 d), shorter hospital length of stay (median 20 vs 52 d), lower in-hospital mortality (27% vs 37%), and less major morbidity at discharge in survivors (new tracheostomy, oxygen or mechanical ventilation need or neurologic deficit; 0% vs 11%, 0% vs 20%, and 8% vs 15%, respectively). Most patients with MIS-C requiring ECMO support (87%) were admitted during the pre-Delta (variant B.1.617.2) period, while most patients with acute COVID-19 requiring ECMO support (70%) were admitted during the Delta variant period. Conclusions: ECMO support for SARS-CoV-2-related critical illness was uncommon, but type, initiation, and duration of ECMO use in MIS-C and acute COVID-19 were markedly different. Like pre-pandemic pediatric ECMO cohorts, most patients survived to hospital discharge

Avaliação de dois simuladores para predição da lixiviação de sulfona de aldicarbe em um Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo Evaluation of two simulators to predict the leaching of aldoxycarb in a red-yellow latossol

Este trabalho teve por objetivo o estudo da lixiviação de sulfona de aldicarbe em um Latossolo Vermelho-Amarelo, na região de Lavras, MG, para posterior comparação com os resultados obtidos pelos simuladores CALF e PESTLA. Os resultados mostraram alta lixiviação de sulfona de aldicarbe no solo em estudo. Aos 44 dias após a aplicação do inseticida e com uma lâmina de água acumulada de 241,4 mm, a quantidade média de sulfona de aldicarbe remanescente nas colunas de solo de 45 cm de profundidade foi equivalente a 17,92% (±5,88) da dose aplicada, enquanto os simuladores CALF e PESTLA estimaram 20,52% e 37,82%, respectivamente. O simulador CALF gerou melhores estimativas da quantidade média de sulfona de aldicarbe no perfil do solo nas diferentes datas de amostragem, enquanto o simulador PESTLA gerou melhores estimativas da distribuição do inseticida ao longo do perfil do solo, nas diferentes datas de amostragem.<br>This work was carried out to study the leaching of aldoxycarb in a Red Yellow Latossol in Lavras, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, and to compare the observed results with those obtained by the simulators CALF and PESTLA. The results showed a high leaching of aldoxycarb in the soil. After 44 days of the insecticide application and with 241.4 mm of accumulated water applied in each column, the remained quantity of aldoxycarb in the soil columns (45 cm long) was 17.92% (±5.88) of the initial applied rate. However, the simulators CALF and PESTLA predicted 20.52% and 37.82%, respectively. CALF simulator gave better predictions of the overall mean residue concentrations of aldoxycarb, and PESTLA simulator gave better prediction of residues distribution