Combinatorial Information Theory: I. Philosophical Basis of Cross-Entropy and Entropy

This study critically analyses the information-theoretic, axiomatic and combinatorial philosophical bases of the entropy and cross-entropy concepts. The combinatorial basis is shown to be the most fundamental (most primitive) of these three bases, since it gives (i) a derivation for the Kullback-Leibler cross-entropy and Shannon entropy functions, as simplified forms of the multinomial distribution subject to the Stirling approximation; (ii) an explanation for the need to maximize entropy (or minimize cross-entropy) to find the most probable realization; and (iii) new, generalized definitions of entropy and cross-entropy - supersets of the Boltzmann principle - applicable to non-multinomial systems. The combinatorial basis is therefore of much broader scope, with far greater power of application, than the information-theoretic and axiomatic bases. The generalized definitions underpin a new discipline of ``{\it combinatorial information theory}'', for the analysis of probabilistic systems of any type. Jaynes' generic formulation of statistical mechanics for multinomial systems is re-examined in light of the combinatorial approach. (abbreviated abstract)Comment: 45 pp; 1 figure; REVTex; updated version 5 (incremental changes

Combinatorial Entropies and Statistics

We examine the {combinatorial} or {probabilistic} definition ("Boltzmann's principle") of the entropy or cross-entropy function $H \propto \ln \mathbb{W}$ or $D \propto - \ln \mathbb{P}$, where $\mathbb{W}$ is the statistical weight and $\mathbb{P}$ the probability of a given realization of a system. Extremisation of $H$ or $D$, subject to any constraints, thus selects the "most probable" (MaxProb) realization. If the system is multinomial, $D$ converges asymptotically (for number of entities N \back \to \back \infty) to the Kullback-Leibler cross-entropy $D_{KL}$; for equiprobable categories in a system, $H$ converges to the Shannon entropy $H_{Sh}$. However, in many cases $\mathbb{W}$ or $\mathbb{P}$ is not multinomial and/or does not satisfy an asymptotic limit. Such systems cannot meaningfully be analysed with $D_{KL}$ or $H_{Sh}$, but can be analysed directly by MaxProb. This study reviews several examples, including (a) non-asymptotic systems; (b) systems with indistinguishable entities (quantum statistics); (c) systems with indistinguishable categories; (d) systems represented by urn models, such as "neither independent nor identically distributed" (ninid) sampling; and (e) systems representable in graphical form, such as decision trees and networks. Boltzmann's combinatorial definition of entropy is shown to be of greater importance for {"probabilistic inference"} than the axiomatic definition used in information theory.Comment: Invited contribution to the SigmaPhi 2008 Conference; accepted by EPJB volume 69 issue 3 June 200

Jaynes' MaxEnt, Steady State Flow Systems and the Maximum Entropy Production Principle

Jaynes' maximum entropy (MaxEnt) principle was recently used to give a conditional, local derivation of the ``maximum entropy production'' (MEP) principle, which states that a flow system with fixed flow(s) or gradient(s) will converge to a steady state of maximum production of thermodynamic entropy (R.K. Niven, Phys. Rev. E, in press). The analysis provides a steady state analog of the MaxEnt formulation of equilibrium thermodynamics, applicable to many complex flow systems at steady state. The present study examines the classification of physical systems, with emphasis on the choice of constraints in MaxEnt. The discussion clarifies the distinction between equilibrium, fluid flow, source/sink, flow/reactive and other systems, leading into an appraisal of the application of MaxEnt to steady state flow and reactive systems.Comment: 6 pages; paper for MaxEnt0

Learning Optimal Control of Synchronization in Networks of Coupled Oscillators using Genetic Programming-based Symbolic Regression

Networks of coupled dynamical systems provide a powerful way to model systems with enormously complex dynamics, such as the human brain. Control of synchronization in such networked systems has far reaching applications in many domains, including engineering and medicine. In this paper, we formulate the synchronization control in dynamical systems as an optimization problem and present a multi-objective genetic programming-based approach to infer optimal control functions that drive the system from a synchronized to a non-synchronized state and vice-versa. The genetic programming-based controller allows learning optimal control functions in an interpretable symbolic form. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated in controlling synchronization in coupled oscillator systems linked in networks of increasing order complexity, ranging from a simple coupled oscillator system to a hierarchical network of coupled oscillators. The results show that the proposed method can learn highly-effective and interpretable control functions for such systems.Comment: Submitted to nonlinear dynamic