Dasatinib cessation after deep molecular response exceeding 2 years and natural killer cell transition during dasatinib consolidation

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) improve the prognosis of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) by inducing substantial deep molecular responses (DMR); some patients have successfully discontinued TKI therapy after maintaining DMR for ≥1 year. In this cessation study, we investigated the optimal conditions for dasatinib discontinuation in patients who maintained DMR for ≥2 years. This study included 54 patients with CML who were enrolled in a D‐STOP multicenter prospective trial, had achieved DMR, and had discontinued dasatinib after 2‐year consolidation. Peripheral lymphocyte profiles were analyzed by flow cytometry. The estimated 12‐month treatment‐free survival (TFS) was 62.9% (95% confidence interval: 48.5%‐74.2%). During dasatinib consolidation, the percentage of total lymphocytes and numbers of CD3⁻ CD56⁺ natural killer (NK) cells, CD16⁺ CD56⁺ NK cells and CD56⁺ CD57⁺ NK‐large granular lymphocytes (LGL) were significantly higher in patients with molecular relapse after discontinuation but remained unchanged in patients without molecular relapse for >7 months. At the end of consolidation, patients whose total lymphocytes comprised <41% CD3⁻ CD56⁺ NK cells, <35% CD16⁺ CD56⁺ NK cells, or <27% CD56⁺ CD57⁺ NK‐LGL cells had higher TFS relative to other patients (77% vs 18%; P < .0008; 76% vs 10%; P < .0001; 84% vs 46%; P = .0059, respectively). The increase in the number of these NK cells occurred only during dasatinib consolidation. In patients with DMR, dasatinib discontinuation after 2‐year consolidation can lead to high TFS. This outcome depends significantly on a smaller increase in NK cells during dasatinib consolidation

Treatment Strategies Considering Micro-Environment and Clonal Evolution in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is an uncurable hematological malignancy because of obtained drug resistance. Microenvironment and clonal evolution induce myeloma cells to develop de novo and acquired drug resistance, respectively. Cell adhesion-mediated drug resistance, which is induced by the interaction between myeloma and bone marrow stromal cells, and soluble factor-mediated drug resistance, which is induced by cytokines and growth factors, are two types of de novo drug resistance. The microenvironment, including conditions such as hypoxia, vascular and endosteal niches, contributes toward de novo drug resistance. Clonal evolution was associated with acquired drug resistance and classified as branching, linear, and neutral evolutions. The branching evolution is dependent on the microenvironment and escape of immunological surveillance while the linear and neutral evolution is independent of the microenvironment and associated with aggressive recurrence and poor prognosis. Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibody agents (MoAbs), and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have improved prognosis of myeloma via improvement of the microenvironment. The initial treatment plays the most important role considering de novo and acquired drug resistance and should contain PIs, IMIDs, MoAb and ASCT. This review summarizes the role of anti-myeloma agents for microenvironment and clonal evolution and treatment strategies to overcome drug resistance

Advantages of Higher Busulfan Dose Intensity in Fludarabine-Combined Conditioning for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Cord Blood Transplantation

The alkylating agent busulfan is commonly used as conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, a consensus has not yet been reached regarding the optimal busulfan dose in cord blood transplantation (CBT). Therefore, we conducted this large nationwide cohort study to retrospectively analyze the outcomes of CBT in patients with AML receiving busulfan at intermediate (6.4 mg/kg i.v.; BU2) or higher (12.8 mg/kg i.v.; BU4) doses within a fludarabine/i.v. busulfan (FLU/BU) regimen. Among 475 patients who underwent their first CBT following FLU/BU conditioning between 2007 and 2018, 162 received BU2 and 313 received BU4. Multivariate analysis identified BU4 as a significant factor for longer disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], .85; 95% confidence interval [CI], .75 to .97; P = .014) and a lower relapse rate (HR, .84; 95% CI, .72 to .98; P = .030). No significant differences were observed in non-relapse mortality between BU4 and BU2 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, .88-1.26; P = .57). Subgroup analyses showed that BU4 provided significant benefits for patients who underwent transplantation while not in complete remission (CR) and those age <60 years. Our present results suggest that higher busulfan doses are preferable in patients undergoing CBT, particularly those not in CR and younger patients