Moment Tensor Analysis of Acoustic Emissions Induced by Laboratory-based Hydraulic Fracturing in Granite,

Moment Tensors of hydraulically induced AEs: Hydraulic fracturing is an important technique in the development of enhanced geothermal systems and unconventional resources. Although the fracture modes induced by hydraulic fracturing influence the recovery efficiency of the resources, the current understanding of this relationship is insufficient. In this study, we considered the acoustic emissions (AEs) induced during hydraulic fracturing under uniaxial loading conditions in the laboratory, and applied a moment tensor analysis by carefully correcting the coupling condition and directivity of AE transducers. Experiments were conducted for two types of Kurokami–jima granite samples: those with a rift plane perpendicular (Type H) or parallel (Type V) to the expected direction of fracture propagation (i.e. along the loading axis). In the experiments, both sample types experienced a significant number of shear, tensile and compressive events. The dominant fracture mode for Type H samples is found to be tensile events in which the fracture plane is parallel to the loading axis, whereas for Type V samples, shear events are dominant. This difference suggests that the dominant fracture modes induced by hydraulic fracturing are highly dependent on the relationship between the direction of fracture propagation and orientation of pre-existing weak planes

Monitoring hydraulically-induced fractures in the laboratory using acoustic emissions and the fluorescent method

We investigated the relation between seismic events and fractures induced by hydraulic fracturing in laboratory experiments under uniaxial loading conditions using granite and shale blocks by monitoring acoustic emissions (AEs). We used a thermosetting acrylic resin mixed with a fluorescent compound as the fracturing fluid and fixed it within the blocks by heating immediately after fracturing. This allowed observation of fluid penetration regions and fracturing patterns on cross-sectional planes under ultraviolet light irradiation. The obtained AE hypocenters and resin penetration regions observed after the fracturing extended on both wings along the loading axis from the fracturing hole for all the samples. This was as expected theoretically, although the AEs were concentrated primarily on only one side for some samples. Patterns of wellbore pressurization histories, AE activities, and resin penetration regions were significantly different between the two rock types. In the experiments using granite samples, wellbore pressure increased linearly until 87.2–97.4% of the peak pressure, followed by a gradual decrease of the rate and sudden drop of pressure (breakdown). AEs started to occur at 49.6–93.2% of the peak pressure, significantly before the breakdown. Resin penetration regions have a width of 10–30 mm and such wide penetration regions resulted in indistinguishable main fractures. For the shale samples, both the nonlinearity of the wellbore pressure–time curve and the AE activity were initiated immediately before breakdown. The number of detected AEs was much smaller than for the granites. Resin in the rock samples showed thin traces with widths of < 1 mm, corresponding to the main fracture. Such dissimilarities between the two rock types likely resulted from differences in their permeability, grain size, and/or mineralogy. We also found aseismic regions that lacked AEs despite evidence of fluid penetration. Although such regions were affected by the fracturing operations, they cannot be revealed by the microseismic observations used in shale gas/oil fields and enhanced geothermal systems