Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: Indications, Limitations and Diagnostic Yield

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (CE) is a simple, safe, non-invasive, reliable technique, well accepted and tolerated by the patients, which allows complete exploration of the small intestine. The advent of CE in 2000 has dramatically changed the diagnosis and management of many diseases of the small intestine, such as obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohn’s disease, small bowel tumors, polyposis syndromes, etc. CE has become the gold standard for the diagnosis of most diseases of the small bowel. Lately this technique has also been used for esophageal and colonic diseases. The review focuses on the indications, limitations and diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in the investigation of small bowel diseases

Efficacy of Infliximab after Failure of Subcutaneous Anti-TNF Agents in Patients with Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Aim: To assess the efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who had failed therapy with adalimumab or golimumab. Methods: Retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data of all anti-TNF naive patients with moderate to severe UC who received adalimumab or golimumab in 4 tertiary referral centres. Patients with primary non response or secondary loss of response to adalimumab or golimumab received therapy with infliximab. Clinical response and remission rates were assessed at week 14 and 54 after initiation of infliximab. Results: Between September 2015 and September 2017, 29 of 58 (50%) anti-TNF naive patients with moderate to severe UC failed therapy with adalimumab (n=38) or golimumab (n=20). Twenty one of 29 (72.4%) patients were primary non responders and 8 (27.6%) patients lost response to adalimumab or golimumab. All these 29 patients received infliximab, while 15 (51.7%) were on concomitant azathioprine therapy. Eighteen (62.1%) and 10 (34.5%) patients showed clinical response and clinical remission at week 14 respectively, while 14 (48.3%) patients were on clinical remission at week 54 after initiation of infliximab. Azathioprine co-administration at the start of infliximab was associated with a greater proportion of patients achieving clinical remission at week 54 (10 of 15 patients on combination therapy vs 4 of 14 patients on infliximab monotherapy, p=0.04). Conclusions: A significant proportion of anti-TNF naive patients with moderate to severe UC who have failed 1st course therapy with subcutaneous anti-TNF agents can achieve clinical response and/or remission with 2nd course therapy with infliximab

One-year infliximab administration for the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis

Abstract Aim To determine the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis, following ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods Seven patients (4 females, 3 males) with chronic refractory pouchitis were included in an open study. Pouchitis was diagnosed by clinical plus endoscopic and histological criteria. Three patients also had fistulae (pouch-bladder in 1 and perianal in 2). Extraintestinal manifestations were also present in 4 patients (erythema nodosum in 2, arthralgiae in 2). All patients were refractory to standard therapy. Crohn's disease was carefully excluded in all patients after re-evaluation of the history and examination of the small bowel with enteroclysis or small bowel capsule endoscopy. Patients received Infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2 and 6 weeks and thereafter every 2 months for 1 year. Clinical response was classified as complete, partial, and no response. Fistulae closure was classified as complete, partial, and no closure. The pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) was also used as an outcome measure. Results Clinically, all patients improved. After 1 year of follow-up, 5 of the 7 patients had a complete clinical response, and 2 of the 3 patients with a fistula had complete fistulae closure. At the end of the follow-up period the median PDAI dropped from 11 (baseline) (range, 10-14) to 5 (range, 3-8). Extraintestinal manifestations were in complete remission at the end of the followup period as well. Conclusions Our results indicate that infliximab may be recommended for the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis complicated or not by fistulae following IPAA for UC

Selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of hypersensitive esophagus

In patients with proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) resistant reflux symptoms, ambulatory 24 h pH impedance monitoring can be used to assess whether a relationship exists between symptoms and reflux episodes. Using this technique it has been suggested that patients with typical reflux symptoms and a normal upper endoscopy should be subclassified as follows: normal endoscopy and abnormal distal acid esophageal exposure (patients with acid reflux); normal endoscopy, with normal distal acid esophageal exposure and a positive symptom association for either acid or nonacid reflux (patients with hypersensitive esophagus); and normal endoscopy, normal distal acid esophageal exposure and a negative symptom association for acid and nonacid reflux (patients with functional heartburn). Although for patients with a normal endoscopy and abnormal distal acid esophageal exposure more aggressive acid suppression can be recommended, managing patients with hypersensitive esophagus and functional heartburn remains a real challenge