15 research outputs found

    PD-loop: A complex of duplex DNA with an oligonucleotide

    No full text
    A stable complex between duplex DNA and an oligonucleotide is assembled with the aid of a DNA synthetic mimic, peptide nucleic acid (PNA). Homopyrimidine PNAs are known to invade into short homopurine tracts in duplex DNA forming P-loops. We have found that P-loops, formed at two closely located purine tracts in the same DNA strand separated by a mixed purine–pyrimidine sequence, merge and open the double helix between them. The opposite DNA strand, which is not bound with PNA, exposes and becomes accessible for complexing with an oligonucleotide via Watson–Crick pairing. As a result, the PD-loop emerges, which consists of locally open duplex DNA, PNA “openers,” and an oligonucleotide. The PD-loop stability and sequence specificity are demonstrated by affinity capture of duplex DNAs by using biotinylated oligonucleotides and streptavidin-covered magnetic beads. The type of complex formed by PNAs, an oligonucleotide and duplex DNA we describe, opens ways for development of various in vitro and in situ hybridization techniques with duplex DNA and may find applications in DNA nanotechnology and genomics

    Parallel Processing in Genome Mapping and Sequencing

    Get PDF
    analysis of arrays of samples or analysis of complex Conventional genome mapping and sequencing involves the mixtures of samples. Obviously, these approaches creanalysis and processing of individual samples and pieces of ate an increase in experimental efficiency by increasing experimental data. Although these methods work, it is quite the speed at which data accumulate. Some of the apclear that more efficient and less expensive methods are proaches use comparative information (map or seneeded. Our top down physical mapping experiments have fo-quence data on mixtures of samples or differences cused on the parallel processing of information from multiple among these samples) to construct the primary inforsamples at one time. This approach has aided the construction mation itself (map or sequence data on individual samof genomic restriction maps and allowed us to assess the degree ples or species). iments. Also described are several comparative methods that use parallel processes to evaluate and identify DNA and RNA differences between pairs of samples. In the past, genomic mapping and DNA sequencing methods focused on analyzing single samples one at a DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD time. The complexity (e.g., single-copy DNA size) of the sample that could be analyzed was limited by the It is quite obvious that parallel processing of genomic analytical method. In such experiments, information samples potentially greatly increases the efficiency of collected in series on different samples was compared experiments. What is not obvious is what the best way after the primary data were obtained. Now, a number is to apply these principles to particular experiments, of techniques that allow the parallel processing of muleven though, amazingly, there is a limited repertoire tiple samples of the same complexity have been develof techniques that are used to analyze and manipulate oped. Examples of parallel processing are simultaneous nucleic acids. The available techniques include direct DNA sequencing (e.g., single-base determinations), hy-1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone

    Anti-microRNA-21 Therapy on Top of ACE Inhibition Delays Renal Failure in Alport Syndrome Mouse Models

    No full text
    Col4a3−/− Alport mice serve as an animal model for renal fibrosis. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) expression has been shown to be increased in the kidneys of Alport syndrome patients. Here, we investigated the nephroprotective effects of Lademirsen anti-miR-21 therapy. We used a fast-progressing Col4a3−/− mouse model with a 129/SvJ background and an intermediate-progressing F1 hybrid mouse model with a mixed genetic background, with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) monotherapy in combination with anti-miR-21 therapy. In the fast-progressing model, the anti miR-21 and ACEi therapies showed an additive effect in the reduction in fibrosis, the decline of proteinuria, the preservation of kidney function and increased survival. In the intermediate-progressing F1 model, the anti-miR-21 and ACEi therapies individually improved kidney pathology. Both also improved kidney function and survival; however, the combination showed a significant additive effect, particularly for survival. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) gene expression profiling revealed that the anti-miR-21 and ACEi therapies modulate several common pathways. However, anti-miR-21 was particularly effective at normalizing the expression profiles of the genes involved in renal tubulointerstitial injury pathways. In conclusion, significant additive effects were detected for the combination of anti-miR-21 and ACEi therapies on kidney function, pathology and survival in Alport mouse models, as well as a strong differential effect of anti-miR-21 on the renal expression of fibrotic factors. These results support the addition of anti-miR-21 to the current standard of care (ACEi) in ongoing clinical trials in patients with Alport syndrome
    corecore