Objectively Measured Sleep Duration and Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome: A One-Year Longitudinal Analysis of the PREDIMED-Plus Cohort

The aim of our cross-sectional and longitudinal study is to assess the relationship between daytime and night-time sleep duration and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with metabolic syndrome after a 1-year healthy lifestyle intervention. Analysis of the data from 2119 Spanish adults aged 55–75 years from the PREDIMED-Plus study was performed. Sleep duration was assessed using a wrist-worn accelerometer. HRQoL was measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Linear regression models adjusted for socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and morbidity were developed. In cross-sectional analyses, participants with extreme night-time sleep duration categories showed lower physical component summary scores in Models 1 and 2 [β-coefficient (95% confidence interval) 9 h vs. 7–9 h: −1.1 (−2.0 to −0.3); p = 0.01]. Participants who sleep less than 7 h a night and take a nap are associated with higher mental component summary scores [β-coefficient (95% confidence interval) 6.3 (1.3 to 11.3); p = 0.01]. No differences between night-time sleep categories and 12-month changes in HRQoL were observed. In conclusion, in cross-sectional analyses, extremes in nocturnal sleep duration are related to lower physical component summary scores and napping is associated with higher mental component summary scores in older adults who sleep less than 7 h a night.The PREDIMED-Plus trial was supported by the European Research Council (Advanced Research Grant 2013–2018, 340918) to Dr Martínez-González, and the official funding agency for biomedical research of the Spanish government, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, through the Fondo de Investigación para la Salud, which is cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund (five coordinated Fondo de Investigación para la Salud projects led by Dr. Salas-Salvadó and Dr Vidal, including the following projects: PI13/00673, PI13/00492, PI13/00272, PI13/01123, PI13/00462, PI13/00233, PI13/02184, PI13/00728, PI13/01090, PI13/01056, PI14/01722, PI14/00636, PI14/00618, PI14/00696, PI14/01206, PI14/01919, PI14/00853, PI14/01374, PI14/00972, PI14/00728, PI14/01471, PI16/00473, PI16/00662, PI16/01873, PI16/01094, PI16/00501, PI16/00533, PI16/00381, PI16/00366, PI16/01522, PI16/01120, PI17/00764, PI17/01183, PI17/00855, PI17/01347, PI17/00525, PI17/01827, PI17/00532, PI17/00215, PI17/01441, PI17/00508, PI17/01732, PI17/00926, PI19/00957, PI19/00386, PI19/00309, PI19/01032, PI19/00576, PI19/00017, PI19/01226, PI19/00781, PI19/01560 and PI19/01332), the Especial Action Project titled Implementación y evaluación de una intervención intensiva sobre la actividad física, a Cohorte PREDIMED-Plus grant to Dr Salas-Salvadó, the Recercaixa grant to Dr Salas-Salvadó (2013ACUP00194), a CICYT (Consejo Interinstitucional de Ciencia y Tecnología) grant (AGL2016–75329-R), a grant from the Generalitat Valenciana (APOSTD/2019/136 to R.B.) and Generalitat de Catalunya (SGR-2019 to R.E.), grants from the Consejería de Salud de la Junta de Andalucía (PI0458/2013, PS0358/2016 and PI0137/2018), grants from the Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2017/017), a SEMERGEN (Sociedad Española de Médicos de Atención Primaria) grant, EU-COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action CA16112, a grant of support to research groups number 35/2011 from the Balearic Islands Government, grants from IDISBA (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Islas Baleares), funds from the European Regional Development Fund (CIBEROBN CB06/03 and CB12/03), from the European Commission (EAT2BENI-CE_H2020_SFS2016) and Universidad de León for funding the manuscript. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the article or in the decision to publish the results

Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

4to. Congreso Internacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación para la Sociedad. Memoria académica

Este volumen acoge la memoria académica de la Cuarta edición del Congreso Internacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación para la Sociedad, CITIS 2017, desarrollado entre el 29 de noviembre y el 1 de diciembre de 2017 y organizado por la Universidad Politécnica Salesiana (UPS) en su sede de Guayaquil. El Congreso ofreció un espacio para la presentación, difusión e intercambio de importantes investigaciones nacionales e internacionales ante la comunidad universitaria que se dio cita en el encuentro. El uso de herramientas tecnológicas para la gestión de los trabajos de investigación como la plataforma Open Conference Systems y la web de presentación del Congreso http://citis.blog.ups.edu.ec/, hicieron de CITIS 2017 un verdadero referente entre los congresos que se desarrollaron en el país. La preocupación de nuestra Universidad, de presentar espacios que ayuden a generar nuevos y mejores cambios en la dimensión humana y social de nuestro entorno, hace que se persiga en cada edición del evento la presentación de trabajos con calidad creciente en cuanto a su producción científica. Quienes estuvimos al frente de la organización, dejamos plasmado en estas memorias académicas el intenso y prolífico trabajo de los días de realización del Congreso Internacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación para la Sociedad al alcance de todos y todas

Problemática de la visita pública de los yacimientos arqueológicos subacuáticos: el caso del puerto de Ampurias

Superada ya la etapa en la que el patrimonio cultural permanecía recluido en gabinetes y colecciones para su clasificación y estudio por parte de los especialistas, recibiendo un tratamiento casi exclusivamente academicista, en las últimas décadas, en paralelo a la evolución económica, educativa y de mejoras en el nivel de vida en Europa, se ha venido produciendo un incremento de la demanda del disfrute público de ese patrimonio cultural. En estos momentos está plenamente aceptado que el proc..

La arqueología subacuática. Historia, teoría y métodos

La arqueología subacuática es una disciplina joven que nace en el siglo XX, cuando se proponen técnicas propias para el estudio de embarcaciones hundidas bajo el agua y ello propicia su desarrollo conceptual, permitiendo estudiar diversos tipos de yacimientos arqueológicos, no sólo en el mar sino en otros cuerpos de agua. Este artículo tiene como objetivo poner en contexto el origen y desarrollo de la arqueología subacuática desde las primeras intervenciones de recuperación de objetos hasta la consolidación como una disciplina científic

La arqueología subacuática. Historia, teoría y métodos

Underwater archaeology is a young discipline that was born in the 20th century, when techniques for the study of sunken vessels underwater were proposed and this led to its conceptual development, allowing the study of different types of archaeological sites, not only in the sea but also in other bodies of water.  This article aims to put into context the origin and development of the underwater archaeology from the first interventions to recover objects to its consolidation as a scientific discipline. La arqueología subacuática es una disciplina joven que nace en el siglo XX, cuando se proponen técnicas propias para el estudio de embarcaciones hundidas bajo el agua y ello propicia su desarrollo conceptual, permitiendo estudiar diversos tipos de yacimientos arqueológicos, no sólo en el mar sino en otros cuerpos de agua.  Este artículo tiene como objetivo poner en contexto el origen y desarrollo de la arqueología subacuática desde las primeras intervenciones de recuperación de objetos hasta la consolidación como una disciplina científica