What is animal politics? Outline of a new research agenda

Animal Politics, i.e. the study of human-animal relations in Political Theory, is a relative newcomer to the portfolio of Animal Studies. While other academic disciplines, from Cultural Studies and Moral Philosophy to History, Sociology and Law, have all established highly visible branches of Animal Studies in recent decades, Political Theory has struggled to carve out a distinctive approach. In this contribution, we identify five features highlighting the fact that human-animal relations are conceived from within Political Theory, distinguishing Animal Politics from Animal Ethics and Animal Rights. Animal Politics is concerned with the political subjection of humans and animals (1) and with the existence, nature and justification of animals’ coercive claims (2). It discusses the political inclusion of animals in human polities and the claims of "sovereign" animal collectives (3). Animal Politics develops normative designs with a view to their practical, non-ideal realisation (4), and, finally, reflects its own status as a body of discourse within democratic societies (5). In the final part of the contribution, we present the contributions to this HSR Forum

Mehr Demokratie wagen! Über Bernd Ladwigs "Politische Philosophie der Tierrechte"

Bernd Ladwig: Politische Philosophie der Tierrechte. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2020. 978-3-518-29915-

Auf dem Weg zur Interspezies-Demokratie: Rezension zu "Was Tiere wirklich wollen" von Eva Meijer

Eva Meijer: Was Tiere wirklich wollen - Eine Streitschrift über politische Tiere und tierische Politik. Berlin: btb 2019. 978-3-442-75812-

After Brexit, the UK should have a democratic right of return

Many people believe that the UK's decision to leave the EU spells trouble for both country and continent, yet by and large think that the exit vote and process, painful though they may be, adhere to the rules and spirit of democratic self-government. Peter Niesen and Markus Patberg argue that in one important respect this is not the case, since fully democratic credentials require reversibility in decision-making and are incompatible with an irreversible loss of political rights