Treatment of breast deformity with free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap secondary to pectoralis major flap harvesting

SummaryHead and neck cancer is less common in women than in men. Free tissue transfer is the first choice in reconstructive option for head and neck tumor. Pedicle pectoralis major (PM) flap was a common option in head neck reconstruction in the past, but has become the salvage procedure when free flap fails. However, it is not suitable for female patients because of severe breast deformity and induced psychosocial distress. We present a female patient who had breast deformity due to PM flap reconstruction and was successfully treated with free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. A 48-year-old woman had squamous cell carcinoma in the left side buccal mucosa, T2N0M0, stage II s/p wide excision with partial resection of maxilla and marginal resection of mandible. Free anterolateral thigh flap had been tried but in vain, then alternatively salvaged with a pedicle PM flap 3 years earlier. She presented with malposition of the left breast, nipple retraction, and high riding. We adequately released the contracture and reconstructed with a free DIEP flap. The free DIEP flap survived completely and restored a balanced breast with good shape and symmetry at 1-year follow-up. Although PM flap is a good modality in head and neck reconstruction, it should be used cautiously especially in female patients. The free DIEP flap is not only suitable for breast reconstruction in breast cancer patient, but also a good choice for a different purpose of breast reconstruction such as this patient with breast deformity due to PM flap harvest

Ten-year experience of superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacral defects in Tri-Service General Hospital

Background: Despite advances in reconstruction techniques, sacral sores continue to present a challenge to the plastic surgeon. The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is a reliable flap that preserves the entire contralateral side as a future donor site. On the ipsilateral side, the gluteal muscle itself is preserved and all flaps based on the inferior gluteal artery are still possible. However, the dissection of the perforator is tedious and carries a risk of compromising the perforator vessels. Patients and Methods: During the period between April 2003 and March 2013, 30 patients presented to our section with sacral wounds causing by pressure sores or infected pilonidal cysts. Of a total of 30 patients, 13 were female and 17 were male. Their ages ranged from 22 to 92 years old (mean 79.8 years old). Surgical intervention was performed electively with immediate or delayed reconstruction using a SGAP flap. The characteristics of patients′ age, and sex, and cause of sacral defect, co-morbidities, wound culture, flap size, perforator number, hospital stay, and outcome were reviewed. Results: For all operations, the length of the pedicle dissection will not exceed 1 cm because of the vascular anatomy of the SGAP, which lies adjacent to the sacral region. Due to short pedicle dissection, all SGAP flap were elevated around an hour. All flaps survived except two, which had partial flap necrosis and were finally treated by contralateral V-Y advancement flaps coverage. The mean follow-up period was 14.8 months (range 3-24). No flap surgery-related mortality was found. Conclusion: Perforator-based flaps have become popular in modern reconstructive surgery because of low donor site morbidity and good preservation of muscle. Our study shows that deep pedicle dissection is unnecessary when the surgery involves an accurate indicating perforator, adequate flap size design, and correct selection of flap utilization between tunnel and rotation. The advantages of this modification include a faster operation, less bleeding, and less trauma of the pedicle, which make the SGAP flaps an alternative choice for sacral sores coverage