Palliative stenting for oesophagogastric cancer: tumour and host factors and prognosis

Objectives: Palliative self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion is common in patients not suitable for resection of oesophagogastric (OG) cancer. Factors which may determine survival, however, are not clear. The present study examined the relationship between tumour and host factors, including the systemic inflammatory response and survival of patients undergoing palliative SEMS insertion. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of OG cancer who were considered suitable for palliative SEMS only without systemic therapy were identified. Patient characteristics including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, radiological stage and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS: 0—C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤10 mg/L; 1—CRP >10 mg/L; 2—CRP >10 mg/L; albumin <35 g/L) were recorded prospectively. The relationship between such characteristics and 3-month survival was examined. Results: 203 patients were included in the final analysis. All patients died during follow-up, with median survival from diagnosis 75 days (IQR 47–157). 78% of patients were systemically inflamed (mGPS >1). On multivariate analysis, only poor performance status (HR 1.23, p=0.025), metastatic disease (HR 2.27, p<0.001) and mGPS (HR 1.25, p=0.021) were associated with shorter survival. The combination of performance status and mGPS stratified 3-month survival of patients without metastatic disease from 88% to 20% (p<0.001) and patients with metastases from 43% to 6% (p=0.059). Similar results were observed when analysis was restricted to patients with oesophageal and junctional cancer (M0: 83%–20%, p=0.008; M1: 33%–8%, p=0.082). Conclusion: Performance status, metastatic disease and mGPS are independent predictors of survival in patients with OG cancer undergoing palliative SEMS insertion. These routinely available markers provide a rational system on which to base decisions regarding prognosis and treatment

Does recreational drug use influence survival and morbidity associated with laryngeal cancer

Background: The use of opioids is considered a risk factor for laryngeal cancer. A retrospective study was performed to explore the relationship between recreational drug exposure and laryngeal cancer.Methods: Patients diagnosed between the 1st of January 2013 and the 31st of December 2017 using ICD-10 CD-32 coding were identified from the Head and Neck Multidisciplinary Team database. We divided the study population into two cohorts (RD and non-RD) and compared the demographics, morbidity, and outcomes of these two populations. In addition, we performed case-matched analysis to control for potential confounding factors including gender, alcohol use and cigarette smoking.Findings: 329 patients in Glasgow, Scotland were included with a mean age of 64.96 ± 10.94 and a follow-up of 24 ± 13.91 months. Of these, 39 reported recreational drug use (RD). RD was associated with younger age (53.0 vs. 66.6, p<0.001) at diagnosis with laryngeal cancer. A greater proportion of tumours occurred in the supraglottic subsite (p=0.041). Furthermore, these patients were more likely to undergo tracheostomy (RR=2.50, 95% CI: 1.41-4.44, p=0.008) and laryngectomy (RR=2.25, 95% CI: 1.57-3.21, p<0.001). Recreational drug users were more likely to require enteral feeding support (RR= 1.44, 95% CI: 1.13-1.84, p=0.02) during oncological treatment. No survival differences were noted at 1, 2, or 3-years (plog-rank=0.83). Case matched analysis correcting for smoking, alcohol and gender confirmed that recreational drug users were younger at diagnosis with a predilection for the supraglottic subsite.Conclusion: Recreational drug use is associated with an increased burden of disease and morbidity in laryngeal cancer. We suggest that clinicians view recreational drug exposure as a red flag in those with suspected laryngeal cancer regardless of patient age