Value of lipocalin 2 as a potential biomarker for bacterial meningitis

OBJECTIVES: Central nervous system (CNS) infections are common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We aimed to discover protein biomarkers that could rapidly and accurately identify the likely cause of the infections, essential for clinical management and improving outcome.METHODS: We applied liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry on 45 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from a cohort of adults with/without CNS infections to discover potential diagnostic biomarkers. We then validated the diagnostic performance of a selected biomarker candidate in an independent cohort of 364 consecutively treated adults with CNS infections admitted to a referral hospital in Vietnam. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, we identified lipocalin 2 (LCN2) as a potential biomarker of bacterial meningitis (BM) other than tuberculous meningitis. The analysis of the validation cohort showed that LCN2 could discriminate BM from other CNS infections (including tuberculous meningitis, cryptococcal meningitis and viral/antibody-mediated encephalitis), with the sensitivity: 0.88 (95% confident interval (CI): 0.77-0.94), the specificity: 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88-0.94) and the diagnostic odd ratio: 73.8 (95%CI: 31.8-171.4)). LCN2 outperformed other CSF markers (leukocytes, glucose, protein and lactate) commonly used in routine care worldwide. The combination of LCN2, CSF leukocytes, glucose, protein and lactate resulted in the highest diagnostic performance for BM (area under receiver-operating-characteristic-curve 0.96; 95%CI: 0.93-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that LCN2 is a sensitive and specific biomarker for discriminating BM from a broad spectrum of other CNS infections. A prospective study is needed to assess the diagnostic utility of LCN2 in the diagnosis and management of CNS infections.</p

Human versus equine intramuscular antitoxin, with or without human intrathecal antitoxin, for the treatment of adults with tetanus: a 2x2 factorial randomized control trial

Background: Intramuscular antitoxin is recommended in tetanus treatment, but there are few data comparing human and equine preparations. As tetanus toxin acts within the central nervous system, where there is limited penetration of peripherally-administered antitoxin, intrathecal antitoxin administration may improve clinical outcomes compared to intramuscular injection. Methods: In a 2x2 factorial trial, adults with tetanus in a single-centre in Vietnam were randomized first to 3,000 IU human or 21,000 U equine intramuscular antitoxin, then to either 500 IU intrathecal human antitoxin or sham procedure. Interventions were delivered by independent clinicians, with attending clinicians and study staff blind to treatment allocations. The primary outcome was requirement for mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, death and disability at 240-days, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and adverse events. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT 02999815 (status: recruitment completed). Findings: 272 adults were randomized. Mechanical ventilation was given to 56/130 (43%) of patients allocated to intrathecal antitoxin and 65/131 (50%) allocated to sham procedure (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.13; p=0.29). For the intramuscular allocation 48/107 (45%), patients allocated to human antitoxin received mechanical ventilation compared to 48/108 (44%) patients allocated to equine antitoxin (relative risk (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75, 1.36, p=0.95). No clinically-relevant differences in secondary outcomes or adverse events were seen except for shorter length of ICU stay in those treated with intrathecal antitoxin compared to sham. Interpretation: We found no advantage of intramuscular human antitoxin over intramuscular equine antitoxin in tetanus treatment. Intrathecal antitoxin administration was safe but did not provide overall benefit in addition to intramuscular antitoxin administration. Funding: The Wellcome Trust, grant number 107367/Z/15/Z