Multinational characterization of neurological phenotypes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

Neurological complications worsen outcomes in COVID-19. To define the prevalence of neurological conditions among hospitalized patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test in geographically diverse multinational populations during early pandemic, we used electronic health records (EHR) from 338 participating hospitals across 6 countries and 3 continents (January–September 2020) for a cross-sectional analysis. We assessed the frequency of International Classification of Disease code of neurological conditions by countries, healthcare systems, time before and after admission for COVID-19 and COVID-19 severity. Among 35,177 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was an increase in the proportion with disorders of consciousness (5.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7–7.8%, pFDR < 0.001) and unspecified disorders of the brain (8.1%, 5.7–10.5%, pFDR < 0.001) when compared to the pre-admission proportion. During hospitalization, the relative risk of disorders of consciousness (22%, 19–25%), cerebrovascular diseases (24%, 13–35%), nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (34%, 20–50%), encephalitis and/or myelitis (37%, 17–60%) and myopathy (72%, 67–77%) were higher for patients with severe COVID-19 when compared to those who never experienced severe COVID-19. Leveraging a multinational network to capture standardized EHR data, we highlighted the increased prevalence of central and peripheral neurological phenotypes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, particularly among those with severe disease

Multinational characterization of neurological phenotypes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

Neurological complications worsen outcomes in COVID-19. To define the prevalence of neurological conditions among hospitalized patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test in geographically diverse multinational populations during early pandemic, we used electronic health records (EHR) from 338 participating hospitals across 6 countries and 3 continents (January-September 2020) for a cross-sectional analysis. We assessed the frequency of International Classification of Disease code of neurological conditions by countries, healthcare systems, time before and after admission for COVID-19 and COVID-19 severity. Among 35,177 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, there was an increase in the proportion with disorders of consciousness (5.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-7.8%, pFDR < 0.001) and unspecified disorders of the brain (8.1%, 5.7-10.5%, pFDR < 0.001) when compared to the pre-admission proportion. During hospitalization, the relative risk of disorders of consciousness (22%, 19-25%), cerebrovascular diseases (24%, 13-35%), nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (34%, 20-50%), encephalitis and/or myelitis (37%, 17-60%) and myopathy (72%, 67-77%) were higher for patients with severe COVID-19 when compared to those who never experienced severe COVID-19. Leveraging a multinational network to capture standardized EHR data, we highlighted the increased prevalence of central and peripheral neurological phenotypes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, particularly among those with severe disease

Role of artificial intelligence applications in real-life clinical practice: Systematic review

10.2196/25759Journal of Medical Internet Research234e2575

Work Design in Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Applications: The Role of Advice Provision Timing

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are rapidly revolutionizing the clinical practice in recent years, from imaging to disease screening and diagnosis to treatment planning to clinical outcome prediction. Despite the promising potential of healthcare AI, extant research has primarily focused on the development and validation of AI algorithms. In contrast, few studies have examined how to incorporate AI applications into the existing clinical workflow. More research is thus needed to understand how work design factors influence AI-aided clinical decision making. Drawing from the interpersonal advice taking literature, this study aims to investigate the effects of AI-advice provision timing (i.e., independent versus dependent timing) on physicians’ advice taking behavior and decision outcomes in a clinical diagnosis setting. We will also examine the moderating role of physician expertise. To this end, we will conduct an experiment among physicians using a novel AI-based diagnostic algorithm. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed

Use of Mixed Reality in Neuro-Oncology: A Single Centre Experience

(1) Background: Intra-operative neuronavigation is currently an essential component to most neurosurgical operations. Recent progress in mixed reality (MR) technology has attempted to overcome the disadvantages of the neuronavigation systems. We present our experience using the HoloLens 2 in neuro-oncology for both intra- and extra-axial tumours. (2) Results: We describe our experience with three patients who underwent tumour resection. We evaluated surgeon experience, accuracy of superimposed 3D image in tumour localisation with standard neuronavigation both pre- and intra-operatively. Surgeon training and usage for HoloLens 2 was short and easy. The process of image overlay was relatively straightforward for the three cases. Registration in prone position with a conventional neuronavigation system is often difficult, which was easily overcome during use of HoloLens 2. (3) Conclusion: Although certain limitations were identified, the authors feel that this system is a feasible alternative device for intra-operative visualization of neurosurgical pathology. Further studies are being planned to assess its accuracy and suitability across various surgical disciplines

Use of Mixed Reality in Neuro-Oncology: A Single Centre Experience

(1) Background: Intra-operative neuronavigation is currently an essential component to most neurosurgical operations. Recent progress in mixed reality (MR) technology has attempted to overcome the disadvantages of the neuronavigation systems. We present our experience using the HoloLens 2 in neuro-oncology for both intra- and extra-axial tumours. (2) Results: We describe our experience with three patients who underwent tumour resection. We evaluated surgeon experience, accuracy of superimposed 3D image in tumour localisation with standard neuronavigation both pre- and intra-operatively. Surgeon training and usage for HoloLens 2 was short and easy. The process of image overlay was relatively straightforward for the three cases. Registration in prone position with a conventional neuronavigation system is often difficult, which was easily overcome during use of HoloLens 2. (3) Conclusion: Although certain limitations were identified, the authors feel that this system is a feasible alternative device for intra-operative visualization of neurosurgical pathology. Further studies are being planned to assess its accuracy and suitability across various surgical disciplines