5 research outputs found
Perceptions and experiences of allopathic health practitioners on collaboration with traditional health practitioners in post-apartheid South Africa
BACKGROUND : The indigenous health system was perceived to be a threat to the allopathic
health system. It was associated with ‘witchcraft’, and actively discouraged, and repressed
through prohibition laws. The introduction of the Traditional Health Practitioners Act No 22
of 2007 brought hope that those centuries of disrespect for traditional health systems would
change. The study examined the perceptions and experiences of allopathic health practitioners
on collaboration with traditional health practitioners in post-apartheid South Africa.
METHODS : Qualitative descriptive research methodology was used to collect data from
allopathic health practitioners employed by Limpopo’s Department of Health. In-depth focus
group discussions and meetings were conducted between January and August 2014.
Perceptions and experiences of working with traditional health practitioners were explored.
Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Pretoria and approval from the
Department’s Research Committee.
RESULTS : Dominant views were that the two health systems were not compatible with respect
to the science involved and the source of knowledge. Overall, quality of health care will be
compromised if traditional health practitioners are allowed to work in public health facilities.
CONCLUSION : Allopathic health practitioners do not appear ready to work with traditional
health practitioners, citing challenges of quality of health care, differences regarding concept
of sciences and source of knowledge; and lack of policy on collaboration. Lack of exposure to
traditional medicine seems to impede opportunities to accept and work with traditional
healers. Exposure and training at undergraduate level regarding the traditional health system
is recommended. Policy guidelines on collaborations are urgently required.National Health Scholarship
Program and South African Medical Research Council.http://www.phcfm.orgam2016Nursing ScienceSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH
Perceptions and experiences of allopathic health practitioners on collaboration with traditional health practitioners in post-apartheid South Africa
Background: The indigenous health system was perceived to be a threat to the allopathic health system. It was associated with ‘witchcraft’, and actively discouraged, and repressed through prohibition laws. The introduction of the Traditional Health Practitioners Act No 22 of 2007 brought hope that those centuries of disrespect for traditional health systems would change. The study examined the perceptions and experiences of allopathic health practitioners on collaboration with traditional health practitioners in post-apartheid South Africa.
Methods: Qualitative descriptive research methodology was used to collect data from allopathic health practitioners employed by Limpopo’s Department of Health. In-depth focus group discussions and meetings were conducted between January and August 2014. Perceptions and experiences of working with traditional health practitioners were explored. Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Pretoria and approval from the Department’s Research Committee.
Results: Dominant views were that the two health systems were not compatible with respect to the science involved and the source of knowledge. Overall, quality of health care will be compromised if traditional health practitioners are allowed to work in public health facilities.
Conclusion: Allopathic health practitioners do not appear ready to work with traditional health practitioners, citing challenges of quality of health care, differences regarding concept of sciences and source of knowledge; and lack of policy on collaboration. Lack of exposure to traditional medicine seems to impede opportunities to accept and work with traditional healers. Exposure and training at undergraduate level regarding the traditional health system is recommended. Policy guidelines on collaborations are urgently required
Decolonising the mindsets, attitudes and practices of the allopathic and indigenous health practitioners in postcolonial society : an exploratory approach in the management of patients
BACKGROUND : The indigenous health care system continues in the postcolonial era to be
perceived by antagonists as a threat to Western medicine. It has been associated with
‘witchcraft’, actively discouraged and repressed through official government prohibition laws.
Despite that, human immunodeficiency virus and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
(HIV and AIDS) patients consult both allopathic and indigenous health practitioners.
AIM : The study explored a collaboration model between allopathic and traditional health
practitioners in the management of patients living with HIV and AIDS in postcolonial South Africa.
SETTING : We conducted six combined focus group discussions and four separate group
discussions with each category of co-researchers.
Methods: Combined and separate focus group discussions were conducted with community
members, allopathic and indigenous health practitioners, applying the cyclical method in the
decolonisation process. Their perceptions and experiences in the management of HIV and
AIDS patients were explored, and finally decolonisation strategies suitable for collaboration in
their context were identified.
RESULTS : The two health systems were rendering services to the same HIV and AIDS communities.
Lack of communication created confusion. Collaboration was long overdue. A change in
mindsets, attitudes and practices among practitioners was critical, with an acknowledgement
that ‘neither health system is better than the other, but the two should be complementary,
recognising that the culture and beliefs of patients influence their health-seeking behaviour’.
CONCLUSION : Co-researchers were committed to working together in the fight against HIV and
AIDS infections. Their model for collaboration addresses the challenges of patients’ secrecy, treatment overdose and the abandonment of antiretroviral treatment. Through the application
of a decolonisation process, their mindsets, attitudes and practices towards each other were
changed, enabling the joint development of a custom model for collaboration between
allopathic health practitioners and indigenous health practitioners in the management of
patients living with HIV and AIDS.The South African Medical
Research Council (SAMRC), Deputy VC Research Office,
University of Pretoria, and the National Health Scholarship
Programme (NHSP).http://www.phcfm.orgam2019Nursing ScienceSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH