Combination of panobinostat with ponatinib synergistically overcomes imatinib-resistant CML cells

The major mechanism of imatinib (IM) resistance of CML is the reactivation of ABL kinase either through BCR-ABL gene amplification or mutation. We investigated the cytotoxicity of a pan-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ponatinib, and a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, panobinostat, against IM-resistant CML cells in vitro. Two different IM-resistant cell lines, K562/IM-R1 and Ba/F3/T315I were evaluated in comparison with their respective, parental cell lines, K562 and Ba/F3. K562/IM-R1 overexpressed BCR-ABL due to gene amplification. Ba/F3/T315I was transfected with a BCR-ABL gene encoding T315I-mutated BCR-ABL. Ponatinib inhibited the growth of both K562/IM-R1 and Ba/F3/T315I as potently as it inhibited their parental cells with an IC50 of 2-30 nM. Panobinostat also similarly inhibited the growth of all of the cell lines with an IC50 of 40-51 nM. This was accompanied by reduced histone deacetylase activity, induced histone H3 acetylation, and an increased protein level of heat shock protein 70, which suggested disruption of heat shock protein 90 chaperone function for BCR-ABL and its degradation. Importantly, the combination of ponatinib with panobinostat showed synergistic growth inhibition and induced a higher level of apoptosis than the sum of the apoptosis induced by each agent alone in all of the cell lines. Ponatinib inhibited phosphorylation not only of BCR-ABL but also of downstream signal transducer and activator of transcription 5, protein kinase B, and ERK1/2 in both K562/IM-R1 and Ba/F3/T315I, and the addition of panobinostat to ponatinib further inhibited these phosphorylations. In conclusion, panobinostat enhanced the cytotoxicity of ponatinib towards IM-resistant CML cells including those with T315I-mutated BCR-ABL

The Relative Dose Intensity Changes during Cycles of Standard Regimens in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

No studies have focused on the trajectory of the average relative dose intensity (ARDI) during cycles of first-line chemotherapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. To evaluate the impact of attenuating ARDI during cycles on overall survival, we conducted a multi-centre, longitudinal, observational retrospective study. A total of 307 analysable patients were enrolled. Multivariate Cox hazards modelling with restricted cubic spline models revealed prognostic benefits of higher ARDI up to, but not after, cycle 6. According to group-based trajectory modelling, patients were classified into five groups depending on the pattern of ARDI changes. Among these, two groups in which ARDI had fallen significantly to less than 50% by cycles 4–6 displayed significantly poorer prognosis, despite increased ARDI in the second half of the treatment period (log-rank p = 0.02). The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index offered significant prediction of unfavourable ARDI changes (odds ratio 2.540, 95% confidence interval 1.020–6.310; p = 0.044). Up to cycle 6, maintenance of ARDI in all cycles (but particularly in the early cycles) is important for prognosis. Malnutrition is a significant factor that lets patients trace patterns of ARDI changes during cycles of chemotherapy associated with untoward prognosis

Molecular Predictors of Response in Patients with Myeloid Neoplasms Treated with Lenalidomide

Abstract Up to 70% of patients with del(5q) MDS may respond to Lenalidomide (LEN). However, the success rates in non-del(5q) cases, while substantial, are much lower (ranging from 20-40% depending on selection criteria). Aside from the presence of del(5q), up front identification of potentially responsive patients is difficult, particularly as the mechanistic underpinnings of LEN response are still under investigation. Initial attempts to prospectively predict LEN sensitivity resulted in a description of response expression signatures, but they have not been robust enough to serve as an actionable diagnostic test. In the outset of this study, we stipulated that apart of clinical selection (low risk MDS, transfusion-dependence, normal/low risk cytogenetics, etc.), analyses of molecular lesions including somatic mutations and chromosomal defects may help to predict LEN responsiveness. To that end, we performed deep targeted NGS (using multiamplicon panel of the top most commonly mutated genes in MDS). In total we analyzed 143 cases of myeloid neoplasms (MDS, MDS/MPN, or MPN) treated with LEN (median duration 6 months) for whom annotated clinical outcomes were available (83 responders vs. 60 refractory cases). Clinical parameters including IPSS-R, cytogenetics (FISH, SNP-array or metaphase cytogenetics) were used to characterize patients, whose responses were assessed by 2006 IWG criteria. Initially, in a combined analysis, we included both del(5q) (N =37) and non-del(5q) patients (N =106). Very low/low, intermediate, high/very high IPSS-R scores were found in 47%, 23%, 34% cases, respectively. Of 143 LEN-treated patients, regimens included LEN (80%), or LEN+5-Aza (20%). Any hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PI), and complete response (CR) were achieved in 44%, 14% and 42%, respectively. Responses were associated with a better survival (median survival time 6.2 yrs. vs. 3.7 yrs. in refractory cases; P =.003). Non-responders showed significantly lower platelet levels compared to responders (median 169 vs. 89 K/uL; P =.007) but intricate analysis of clinical parameters (age, other blood counts, blasts and IPSS-R score) failed to identify other factors that would help to select potential responders. As expected, when sub-analysis of patients with del(5q) was performed, combined response was achieved in 78% (OR 13.14 [4.34-39.75]; PR 16%, CR 35%) of patients, respectively, while in non-del(5q) the responses were as predicted lower at 51% (P =.004). Of note is that both del(5q) involving and excluding commonly retained regions (CRR; q11.1-q14.2 and/or q34-qter) also was associated with sensitivity (CRR affected; OR=9.9 [1.4-102], vs. CRR not affected; OR=6.3 [1.3-37.6]). When we analyzed impact of karyotype on LEN sensitivity, -7/del(7q), -20/del(20q), complex karyotype and normal cytogenetics did not correlate with response, but in addition to del(5q); the presence of +8 (7/10 responded; OR 12.25 [1.33-113.06]) was significantly associated with responsiveness. Using targeted deep NGS, we confirmed 168 somatic mutations in responders vs. 142 mutations in non-responders (OR .85; .67-1.07). The number of mutational events per patient did not correlate with responses (P =.38). Among genes sequenced mutations in DDX41 (100% vs. 0%; OR infinity [6.7-infinity]) and RUNX1 mutation+deletion (75% vs. 25%; OR=8.1 [1.1-84.6]) were overrepresented in responders vs. refractory cases while in U2AF1 mutationswere more common among non-responders (20% vs. 80%; OR=.075 [.004-.76]). When reverse analysis was performed DDX41 mutations correlated with LEN response (10% mutant cases among responders vs. 0% in refractory; P =.009), while mutations in U2AF1 correlated with LEN failure (2.4% vs. 13.3% of mutant cases in responders and refractory, respectively; P =.02). The presence of all combined or any of the other spliceosomal mutations (SRSF2, SF3B1, ZRSR2, LUC7L2, and PRPF8) did not influence the results of the therapy. All TP53 mutations were found with complex karyotype with del(5q) and 5/7 (71%) TP53 mutant cases were treatment failures (OR .19 [.01-2.41]). In conclusion, in addition to the presence of del(5q), low platelet count and the presence of various molecular lesions (+8 and RUNX1, DDX41 mutations or wild type status of U2AF1) may help to predict responses to LEN. Disclosures Sekeres: Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Santini:celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Onconova: Honoraria, Research Funding. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding

UTX mutations in Myeloid Neoplasms

Abstract Genetic studies in myeloid neoplasms have revealed that somatic mutations and deletions frequently affect epigenetic regulation via DNA methylation and histone modification. One frequently affected epigenetic complex is polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which trimethylate Histone3Lysine27 (H3K27) to create a repression mark for the expression of a variety of genes that includes essential homeobox genes. Members of this complex include EZH2, EED and SUZ12, which exert methyltransferase activity, and perhaps indirectly also DNTM3A and ASXL1. The histone demethylase ubiquitously transcribed X (UTX) counters the enzymatic activity of PRC2 by removing di- and trimethyl groups from H3K27. It thus removes repressive marks. We were the first to report UTX mutations in a small portion of CMML and MDS cases. In another cohort, frequent somatic loss-of-function mutations in UTX were found in ALL. The goal of the present study was to understand the functional role of UTX and the consequences of its mutations on H3K27 methylation status, specifically with respect to their relevance to myeloid neoplasia. A total of 1,979 patients with various myeloid neoplasms (n = 1,686) and other hematologic disorders (n = 293) were screened for gene mutations in UTXand other reported driver genes relevant to myeloid neoplasms using whole exome sequencing and/or targeted deep-sequencing. Expression array analyses were performed on 200 samples. In addition, we also used sequencing and expression data from the de novo AML TCGA repository. UTXwas mutated in 55 (2.8%) cases out of 1,979 cases. The mutations were found in 2.5% of MDS, 3.1% de novo AML (including 8.3% CBF AML), 4.8% MDS/MPN, and 1.4% secondary AML (sAML). Of those, 77% were missense mutations and 23% nonsense, splice site and frameshift mutations, without an evident hot spot. The male-to-female ratio was 1.2 (55% vs. 45%). UTX gene expression was significantly higher in females than in males (p<.001). After gender adjustment and dichotomized using a threshold of expression of 2 standard deviations from the mean, low UTX expression levels were identified in 13/183 (7%) individuals. When we focused on clonal burden using variant allele frequencies (VAFs) to investigate clonal architecture within the tumor population, in 37 cases UTX constituted subclonal events and in 18 they were dominant. We then examined the molecular context of UTX lesions. Average mutation burden in patients with UTX mutations was higher than in WT UTX carriers (4 vs. 1.5, p<.001). UTX mutations co-occurred with other driver genetic mutations such as ASXL1, ZRSR2, CUX1, NF1. Surprisingly, EZH2 mutations are also enriched in UTX mutated cases although they function in the opposite direction of H3K27 trimethylation. Focusing on dominant clone and subclonal events in cases with these two mutations, EZH2mutations were enriched in cases with dominant UTX clone. This suggests that they play important roles in the cancer's pathogenesis. To clarify the role of UTX in the maintenance of leukemia, genomic knockouts of UTX were developed in human leukemic cell lines using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. RNA sequencing revealed that knockout cell enrichment for developmental regulators such as Hox genes. In addition, we made knockdowns of human CD34+ cells using short hairpin RNAs against UTX. The cells showed enhanced colony formation and increased replating efficiency consistent with retained clonogenicity. The truncating pattern of UTX mutations in myeloid neoplasms suggests that they are loss-of-function hits. Missense mutations thus need to be confirmed. Functional analysis in vitro shows that low expression of UTX may have functionally equivalent consequences. If so, an additional 7% of patients may have low UTX expression, and may thus phenocopy patients with UTX mutations. Combined, a total of ~10% out of myeloid neoplasm patients may harbor UTX deficiency. Epigenetic modifying drugs related to H3K27 such as inhibitors of EZH2and histone deacetylases are in development. It is controversial to which patients they should be applied. Our findings could be key to a deeper understanding of epigenetic alterations, drug function, and response. Disclosures Makishima: The Yasuda Medical Foundation: Research Funding. Mukherjee:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Carraway:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sekeres:Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees

Clonal Events of Aplastic Anemia Related to the Evolution to Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Abstract Somatic mutations constitute clonal markers now amenable to monitoring by deep NGS. While transient and low frequency clones have been described in AA, their pathophysiologic link to the overtly clonal complication of AA, secondary MDS following AA (sMDS), has not been established. Clarification of this relationship may provide clues as to the genesis of sMDS. Identification of predictive markers for AA patients at risk for this complication is necessary. The etiology of sMDS within AA may include either expansion of a preexisting clone or truly late clonogenic events. In both instances, progression may result in clonal escape. To address these questions we studied 258 AA and 60 PNH patients, identifying 35 patients (11%) who evolved to sMDS. Cytogenetic analysis showed abnormal karyotype in 76% cases; 5% had complex karyotype and -7/del(7q) was present in 67% of cases. The presence of a PNH clone was detected in a similar proportion of cases that transformed to sMDS vs. those that did not (P=.76). For comparison, we have also analyzed primary de novo cases of MDS (pMDS) with (N=19) and without (N=161) -7/del(7q). In contrast to sMDS, -7/del(7q) was present in 12% of cases of pMDS. Using WES on 8 cases and a 60 gene targeted panel on 15 cases, confirmed mutational events and chromosomal aberrations were found in 21/23 patients with sMDS; 18/23 cases of sMDS had at least 1 confirmed somatic mutation. By comparison of mutational profiles ASXL1, RUNX1, PIGA, SETBP1, and CBL were most common in sMDS (26.1%, 21.7%, 18%, 13% and 13%, respectively). Because sMDS included a high proportion of patients with -7/del(7q), we compared sMDS with -7/del(7q) to pMDS with -7/del(7q) for coexisting mutational events. Mutations in RUNX1 appeared to be more frequent in sMDS vs. pMDS (27% vs. 0%, P=.03). In contrast, TP53 was more common in pMDS (7% vs. 32%, P=.1). Similarly, there were several other distinctive differences between all sMDS and pMDS irrespective of cytogenetics: mutations in U2AF1 were common in pMDS, mutations in RUNX1 appeared to be more frequent in sMDS vs. pMDS (22% vs. 5.5%, P=.02). Mutations in PIGA gene constituted a marker for sMDS derivation from AA. To discern a possible biological relationship we have also compared mutational profiles of hypocellular pMDS and sMDS, but no significant differences aside from PIGA prevalence were found. If sMDS is derived from mutations present at the AA stage, one would expect overlaps in the mutational spectrum of AA before and after evolution to MDS. DNMT3A, BCOR/BCORL1, and PDGFR family mutations were found at higher frequency in AA while ASXL1, RUNX1, SETBP1, PIGA, and CBL were higher in sMDS. Thus, cross-sectional analysis suggests that most of the clonal events occurring during the course of AA do not initiate sMDS. To further examine these findings we performed serial sequencing analyses: in 7 patients with sMDS WES was performed and clonal architecture was analyzed. We then queried whether mutations present in MDS were detected in archival samples at presentation using deep targeted NGS (depth 5-10x104 rds. In 4/7 cases the alterations appeared to be ancestral events for sMDS evolution. When an additional 68 AA cases were studied by deep NGS, somatic mutations were present in 31% of AA patients at presentation. Patients with clonal events at presentation tended toward worse progression free survival compared to patients without mutations (P=.1). Mutations found at both initial presentation and upon evolution were suggestive of a slow expansion of previously cryptic clones (ASXL1, CUX1, TET2, CBL, RUNX1, and SETBP1). Patients with these gene mutations (n=21) before immunosuppressive therapies (IST) had worseoverall survival compared to patients without these mutations (n=47; P=.009). To assess the potential impact of IST, we also investigated a subset of 37 patients (25 responders/ 12 refractory) following IST. Clonal somatic events were identified in 42 of them, but there was no association between the response to IST and somatic mutations at presentation (P=.7). Our results demonstrate that while subclonal mutations indicative of oligoclonal hematopoiesis are frequent in AA, the presence of specific permissive ancestral somatic events at the outset of AA predisposes patients to sMDS, a feature that has diagnostic and prognostic implications. Disclosures Makishima: The Yasuda Medical Foundation: Research Funding. Sekeres:Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau

U2AF1 Mutations in S34 and Q157 Create Distinct Molecular and Clinical Contexts

Abstract Background: U2AF1 forms a heterodimer for the recognition of the 3' splice site during pre-mRNA splicing. Somatic U2AF1 mutations are present in approximately 10% of MDS patients. Most U2AF1 mutations are recurrent at 2 highly conserved hotspots, while non-canonical mutations are rare. U2AF1S34 and U2AF1Q157 mutations map within the zinc finger domains of the protein, resulting in distinct downstream effects. We have previously shown that U2AF1Q157 mutant patients have distinct splicing patterns compared to U2AF1WT with a set of misspliced targeted genes, including ARID2 and EZH2. In contrast, recent work focusing on S34 suggests a distinct subset of misspliced genes, including ATG7 (Park SM, Molecular Cell, 2016). The biological and clinical implications of these 2 distinct mutations are unknown. We investigated the differences between these mutations with respect to clinical outcomes and molecular background, including their impact on clonal architecture. Methods: We first collected molecular and clinical data on a cohort of 1700 patients with myeloid neoplasms (median follow up 1.0 year, range 1-5 years), median age was 65 years (range, 11-93). Targeted deep sequencing of a panel of frequently mutated genes (64) was applied. Our analyses included somatic mutational patterns, clonal hierarchy, and mutational correlation of the cohort of patients with U2AF1S34 and U2AF1Q157 and those without mutations in this gene. U2AF1 mutations were found in 5% (78/1700) of patients, all of them were missense and in a heterozygous configuration. Results: Both mutations were equally distributed in the cohort: U2AF1S34 (45%, 35/78), and U2AF1Q157 (46%, 36/78). Other mutations (Q84, E124, E152, and R156) were detected at a lower frequency (9%). We then dissected the clonal hierarchy of both U2AF1 mutations and found that 44% (34/77) were ancestral while 56% (43/77) were secondary. In MDS, most U2AF1 mutations (77%, P=.002) were dominant, while subclonal U2AF1 mutations were evenly distributed between the subentities. U2AF1S34 or U2AF1Q157 were equally likely to be dominant (21% vs. 27%; ancestral events; P=.09, respectively). Similarly, S34 and Q157 mutant clones had similar median variant allele frequencies (3-52% vs. 8-64%). U2AF1 S34 mutant cases had similar OS to patients carrying U2AF1Q157 (N=35 vs. N=36; 10 vs. 15 months; P=.209; LogR=.65). When we compared the impact of ancestral vs. secondary U2AF1S34 and U2AF1Q157 we found that MDS patients carrying ancestral U2AF1 mutations had a shorter OS compared to MDS patients carrying secondary U2AF1 patients (N=26 vs. N=18; 13 vs. 34 months; LogR=.04). Of note, ancestral U2AF1S34 patients had shorter OS compared to ancestral U2AF1Q157 patients (13 vs.11; 10 vs.15 months; P=.03; LogR=.86). Given these differences, we also investigated the mutational spectrum of U2AF1MUT patients. Cross sectional analysis identified that the top genes mutated in the U2AF1 mutant cohort were: ASXL1 (26%), BCOR/L1 (15%), TET2 (13%), DNMT3A and PHF6 (12%), ETV6 (10%), RUNX1 and STAG2 (9%), and SETBP1 (8%). Transcriptional factor and DNA-methylation genes were predominantly mutated in U2AF1MUT patients (35% and 24%, respectively). Exploring the association between S34/Q157 vs. other gene mutations, S34 co-occurred with BCOR/L1 mutations (P=.007, 24%), while Q157 mutations co-occurred with ASXL1 (P=.003, 44%) irrespective of their rank in the clonal hierarchy. When S34 was the dominant mutation, secondary mutations included ETV6, BCOR, and CUX1. In contrast, when Q157 was the ancestral event, secondary mutations included ASXL1 and DNMT3A. Subclonal S34 occurred in the context of ancestral RUNX1, BCOR/L1, CUX1 and DNMT3A, while subclonal Q157 followed ancestral ASXL1, EZH2, PHF6 and TET2. Conclusion: In sum, U2AF1S34 and U2AF1Q157, consistent with their differential missplicing consequences, create a distinct molecular milieu leading to differences in clinical outcomes. Disclosures Makishima: The Yasuda Medical Foundation: Research Funding. Carraway:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees