2,393 research outputs found

    Necessary and sufficient condition for hydrostatic equilibrium in general relativity

    Full text link
    We present explicit examples to show that the `compatibility criterion' is capable of providing a {\em necessary} and {\em sufficient} condition for any regular configuration to be compatible with the state of hydrostatic equilibrium. This conclusion is drawn on the basis of the finding that the M−RM-R relation gives the necessary and sufficient condition for dynamical stability of equilibrium configurations only when the compatibility criterion for these configurations is appropriately satisfied. In this regard, we construct an appropriate sequence composed of core-envelope models on the basis of compatibility criterion, such that each member of this sequence satisfies the extreme case of causality condition v=c=1v = c = 1 at the centre. The maximum stable value of u≃0.3389u \simeq 0.3389 (which occurs for the model corresponding to the maximum value of mass in the mass-radius relation) and the corresponding central value of the local adiabatic index, (Γ1)0≃2.5911(\Gamma_1)_0 \simeq 2.5911, of this model are found fully consistent with those of the corresponding {\em absolute} values, umax≤0.3406u_{\rm max} \leq 0.3406, and (Γ1)0≤2.5946(\Gamma_1)_0 \leq 2.5946, which impose strong constraints on these parameters of such models. In addition to this example, we also study dynamical stability of pure adiabatic polytropic configurations on the basis of variational method for the choice of the `trial function', ξ=reν/4\xi =re^{\nu/4}, as well as the mass-central density relation, since the compatibility criterion is appropriately satisfied for these models. The results of this example provide additional proof in favour of the statement regarding compatibility criterion mentioned above.Comment: 31 pages (double-spaced) revtex style, 1 figure in `ps' forma

    Dynamical stability of strange quark stars

    Full text link
    We show that the mass-radius (M−R)(M-R) relation corresponding to the MIT bag models of strange quark matter (SQM) and the models obtained by Day et al (1998) do not provide the necessary and sufficient condition for dynamical stability for the equilibrium configurations, since such configurations can not even fulfill the necessary condition of hydrostatic equilibrium provided by the exterior Schwarzschild solution. These findings will remain unaltered and can be extended to any other sequence of pure SQM. This study explicitly show that although the strange quark matter might exist in the state of zero pressure and temperature, but the models of pure strange quark `stars' can not exist in the state of hydrostatic equilibrium on the basis of General Relativity Theory. This study can affect the results which are claiming that various objects like - RX J1856.5-3754, SAX J1808.4-3658, 4U 1728-34, PSR 0943+10 etc. might be strange stars.Comment: 7 pages (including 6 tables and 1 figure) in MNRAS styl

    Hydrostatic equilibrium of insular, static, spherically symmetric, perfect fluid solutions in general relativity

    Full text link
    An analysis of insular solutions of Einstein's field equations for static, spherically symmetric, source mass, on the basis of exterior Schwarzschild solution is presented. Following the analysis, we demonstrate that the {\em regular} solutions governed by a self-bound (that is, the surface density does not vanish together with pressure) equation of state (EOS) or density variation can not exist in the state of hydrostatic equilibrium, because the source mass which belongs to them, does not represent the `actual mass' appears in the exterior Schwarzschild solution. The only configuration which could exist in this regard is governed by the homogeneous density distribution (that is, the interior Schwarzschild solution). Other structures which naturally fulfill the requirement of the source mass, set up by exterior Schwarzschild solution (and, therefore, can exist in hydrostatic equilibrium) are either governed by gravitationally-bound regular solutions (that is, the surface density also vanishes together with pressure), or self-bound singular solutions (that is, the pressure and density both become infinity at the centre).Comment: 16 pages (including 1 table); added section 5; accepted for publication in Modern Physics Letters
    • …
    corecore