3 research outputs found

    The Incidence of Needlestick Injuries During Perineorrhaphy and Attitudes Toward Occurrence Reports Among Medical Students

    No full text
    Background: Medical students are at risk of needlestick injuries (NSIs) while performing obstetrical procedures especially perineorrhaphy, because of their less experience. This study aims to determine the incidence and causes of NSIs during perineorrhaphy and medical students’ attitudes toward occurrence reports. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. After completion of Obstetrics & Gynaecology rotation, the data from final year medical students were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Results: Of 390 medical students, 290 (74.4%) returned questionnaires with complete data. The annual NSIs incidence during perineorrhaphy was 26.9%. The most common site of injury was the index finger of the non- dominant hand (66.2%). Common causes of NSIs were time pressure (52.1%) and lack of surgical skills (50.7%). Nearly half of students (41%) did not report their occurrence, and 81.3% of injured students believed that NSIs were harmless. Conclusion: The incidence of NSIs during perineorrhaphy and the non-reporting occurrence were quite high among medical students. Structural clinical supervision by medical staffs, HBV vaccination for all medical students, and instruction on standard pre-exposure precaution should be applied. We advocate a strategy plan for increasing students’ awareness and having a simple occurrence reporting system for NSIs, with clear guidelines on post-exposure protocols in all medical schools and teaching hospitals

    Early Removal of the Etonogestrel Contraceptive Implant and Associated Factors Among Users at the Urban Family Planning Clinic in Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

    Get PDF
    Objective: To study the rate and reasons for the early removal of etonogestrel contraceptive implants and associated factors at the family planning clinic in Siriraj Hospital. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between May 2015 and December 2019 and contained 1,030 women who received the etonogestrel contraceptive implant. The medical records of demographic characteristics and clinical factors i.e., implant insertion date, implant removal date, reason for implant removal, contraceptive use before implant insertion and after implant removal, documented bleeding pattern and acceptability, were identified.  Results: The mean age of participants was 28.6 ± 6.9 years. About 21% of women (218/1030) prematurely discontinued their etonogestrel implant. A desire to become pregnant was the most common reason for early removal of the etonogestrel implant (32%). Meanwhile, the most common side-effect contributing to early removal was unscheduled bleeding. The associated variables of early etonogestrel implant removal were low BMI (p-value = 0.021) and unacceptability of bleeding pattern at one year (p-value < 0.001) and two years (p-value < 0.001) after insertion. Conclusion: Early etonogestrel implant discontinuation rate was remarkable and the main reasons for it include a desire to become pregnant and bleeding side effects. Moreover, a lower BMI and unacceptability of bleeding problems also increased the likelihood of early removal of this contraceptive method

    Prevalence of ovarian mass and diagnostic performance of ultrasonography pattern recognition among women at the Gynaecologic Ultrasonography Unit at University Hospital in Thailand

    No full text
    The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of ovarian masses and calculate the diagnostic performance of the pattern recognition approach in ovarian pathology. A total of 1001 patients diagnosed with ovarian mass were included, of which 92.6% were diagnosed with ovarian pathology and the presence of a pathological result, while 7.4% of cases were diagnosed with functional ovarian cyst. The prevalence of ovarian malignancy was 15%. A specific ultrasound diagnosis was suggested in 62.9% of all cases, while sonographers did not explicitly provide a diagnosis in remaining cases. A subjective assessment showed 80.3% sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI) 68.7–89.1) and 97.6% specificity (95% CI 96–98.6) in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian masses. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of endometriotic cyst were 77.03% and 90.63% and 63.19% and 94.3% for mature cystic teratoma, respectively. In conclusion, assessment showed good performance in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian mass and it was possible to diagnose several specific ovarian tumours. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Pattern recognition is an acceptable method for classifying ovarian mass, which exhibits specific morphological features on grey-scale ultrasonography, and can be used to predict nature and histological type. What do the results of this study add? Even in the hands of an expert examiner, there were a number of cases in which the diagnoses could not be specifically stated. Pattern recognition correctly classified 90.3% of ovarian masses as either benign or malignant and correctly provided specific histologic diagnoses after exclusion of unspecified diagnosis in 80.6% of all cases. The diagnostic performance of this approach was high in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian mass and in diagnosing some specific ovarian pathologies. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? A subjective assessment is simple and easy to use in clinical practice and has shown promising results in classifying benign and malignant ovarian mass. Moreover, it can also be used to make some specific diagnoses. However, specialised and experienced gynaecological ultrasound examiners are required to provide the most accurate diagnosis. Therefore, criteria to describe ultrasound features and convincing operators to make a definite diagnosis as often as possible should be encouraged. A prospective study to verify diagnostic performance of pattern recognition or comparing with other ultrasonographic diagnostic tools should be considered
    corecore