18 research outputs found

    Improved long-term performance of pulsatile extracorporeal left ventricular assist device

    Get PDF
    SummaryBackground and purposeThe majority of heart transplant (HTx) candidates require left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support for more than 2 years before transplantation in Japan. However, the only currently available device is the extracorporeal pulsatile LVAD. The long-term management of extracorporeal LVAD support has improved remarkably over the years. To determine which post-operative management factors are related to the long-term survival of patients on such LVAD, we retrospectively compared the incidence of complications and their management strategies between the initial and recent eras of LVAD use, classified by the year of LVAD surgery.MethodsSixty-nine consecutive patients supported by extracorporeal pulsatile LVAD as a bridge to HTx between 1994 and 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were assigned according to the time of LVAD surgery to either group A (n=30; between 1994 and 2000) or group B (n=39; between 2001 and 2007).ResultsPatients in group B survived significantly longer on LVAD support than those in group A (674.6 vs. 369.3 days; p<0.001). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were significantly higher in group B than that in group A (82% vs. 48%, p<0.0001; 68% vs. 23%, p<0.0001, respectively). The proportion of deaths due to cerebrovascular accidents was lower (17% vs. 50%, p<0.001) in group B compared with group A. The incidences of systemic infection were similar in both groups, but the proportions of patients alive and achieving transplant surgery after systemic infection were higher in group B than those in group A (55% vs. 14%, p<0.01; 14% vs. 36%, p<0.05, respectively).ConclusionsThe long-term survival of patients even on “first-generation” extracorporeal LVAD has improved significantly in the recent era. Careful management of cerebrovascular accidents and systemic infection will play important roles in the long-term LVAD management

    Prognostic impact of chronic total coronary occlusion on long-term outcomes in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients with ischemic heart disease

    Get PDF
    Aims The prognostic impact of chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) on implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD) recipients remains unclear. Methods and Results Eighty-four consecutive patients with ischemic heart disease who received ICD therapy for primary or secondary prevention were analyzed. We investigated all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including cardiac death, appropriate device therapy, hospitalization for heart failure, and ventricular assist device implantation. Of the study patients (mean age 70 ± 8 years; 86% men), 34 (40%) had CTO. There were no significant differences in age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA functional class III or IV status, and proportion who underwent secondary prevention between patients with CTO (CTO group) and without CTO (non-CTO group). During a median follow-up of 3.8 years (interquartile range 2.7 to 5.4 years), the CTO group tended to have a higher MACE rate (log-rank P=0.054) than the non-CTO group. Within the CTO group, there was no difference in the MACE rate between patients with and without viable myocardium. In patients with ICD for secondary prevention (n=47), 16 patients (34%) with CTO had a higher MACE rate than patients without CTO (logrank P<0.01). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the presence of CTO, but 3 not LVEF, was associated with a higher MACE rate. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of CTO was a predictor of MACE (P<0.05). Conclusion In patients with ischemic heart disease receiving ICD implantation, the presence of CTO has an adverse impact on long-term prognosis, especially as secondary prevention

    Efficacy and safety of novel anticoagulant dabigatran in clinical practice for Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

    Get PDF
    Background: There is little evidence of the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods and Results: We evaluated 300 consecutive patients with NVAF (68±11 years old, 209 men, 180 paroxysmal) who received 220 mg/day (203 patients) or 300 mg/day dabigatran (97 patients) at our hospital. Most patients (84%) had lower CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age>75 years, diabetes, stroke/transient ischemic attack) scores of 0 (n=60), 1 (n=114), or 2 (n=78) and lower HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition) scores of 0 (n=39), 1 (n=114), or 2 (n=103). The estimated creatinine clearance was 77±24 mL/min, which was inversely correlated to age (r2=0.48, p<0.0001). Activated partial thromboplastin time was 42±9 s but was not dependent on sampling time. During follow-up of 263±160 days, an ischemic stroke occurred in 1 patient (0.3%), but no systemic embolism was observed. Some adverse events were reported for 70 (23%) patients, such as dyspepsia (n=42, 14%) or minor bleeding complications (n=11, 4%) resulting in discontinuation of dabigatran for 39 patients. However, no major complications were observed, and no patient died from adverse events or because of cardiovascular or stroke events. Conclusions: Dabigatran is safe and useful for the prevention of ischemic strokes in Japanese NVAF patients, but additional care should be taken for elderly patients

    Defibrillation lead placement using a transthoracic transatrial approach in a case without transvenous access due to lack of the right superior vena cava

    No full text
    A 65-year-old woman with a history of syncope was diagnosed with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. She had previously undergone mastectomy of the left breast owing to breast cancer. Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) and monitor ECG revealed sick sinus syndrome (Type II) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. Sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation were induced in an electrophysiological study. Although the patient was eligible for treatment with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), venography revealed lack of the right superior vena cava (R-SVC). Lead placement from the left subclavian vein would have increased the risk of lymphedema owing to the patientŚłs mastectomy history. Consequently, the defibrillation lead was placed in the right ventricle by direct puncture of the right auricle through the tricuspid valve. The atrial lead was sutured to the atrial wall, and the postoperative course was unremarkable. Defibrillation lead placement using a transthoracic transatrial approach can be an alternative method in cases where a transvenous approach for lead placement is not feasible

    Retracted: Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with inotrope‐dependent class IV end‐stage heart failure

    No full text
    Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been widely used for the treatment of refractory heart failure (HF). However, the efficacy of CRT is not well established in class IV HF patients on inotropic support. Methods Twenty‐six patients (age 55±18 years, 73% men) with inotrope‐dependent HF were reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness of CRT in class IV HF patients on inotropic support. Results Intravenous inotropic therapy was administered for 72±56 days before CRT and consisted of dobutamine (n=24; 3.0±1.2 ÎŒg kg−1 min−1), dopamine (n=2; 4.5±2.1 ÎŒg kg−1 min−1), and/or milrinone (n=16; 0.12±0.09 ÎŒg kg−1 min−1). CRT did not produce significant reverse remodeling in eligible patients (left ventricular ejection fraction 23±7% to 25±9%; p=0.23, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter 70±9 mm to 68±9 mm; p=0.14). After CRT device implantation, 13 (50%) patients experienced 1 or more episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmia or sudden cardiac death. Twenty (77%) patients survived to hospital discharge with weaning from inotropic support (70±70 days after CRT implantation). The 1‐year survival rate was 81%. However, data from long‐term follow‐up showed that 68% of the study patients who attained survival discharge had an HF hospitalization event within the follow‐up period. Conclusion CRT did not result in significant reverse remodeling in patients with inotrope‐dependent class IV end‐stage HF. However, it contributed to dramatically improve the cardiovascular outcomes at least in the short‐term period in some patients
    corecore