Optimization of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment of neuroblastoma

BackgroundImage- guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) is increasingly utilized to diagnose solid tumors. The objective of this study is to determine whether PCNB is adequate for modern biologic characterization of neuroblastoma.ProcedureA multi- institutional retrospective study was performed by the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative on children with neuroblastoma at 12 institutions over a 3- year period. Data collected included demographics, clinical details, biopsy technique, complications, and adequacy of biopsies for cytogenetic markers utilized by the Children’s Oncology Group for risk stratification.ResultsA total of 243 children were identified with a diagnosis of neuroblastoma: 79 (32.5%) tumor excision at diagnosis, 94 (38.7%) open incisional biopsy (IB), and 70 (28.8%) PCNB. Compared to IB, there was no significant difference in ability to accurately obtain a primary diagnosis by PCNB (95.7% vs 98.9%, P = .314) or determine MYCN copy number (92.4% vs 97.8%, P = .111). The yield for loss of heterozygosity and tumor ploidy was lower with PCNB versus IB (56.1% vs 90.9%, P < .05; and 58.0% vs. 88.5%, P < .05). Complications did not differ between groups (2.9 % vs 3.3%, P = 1.000), though the PCNB group had fewer blood transfusions and lower opioid usage. Efficacy of PCNB was improved for loss of heterozygosity when a pediatric pathologist evaluated the fresh specimen for adequacy.ConclusionsPCNB is a less invasive alternative to open biopsy for primary diagnosis and MYCN oncogene status in patients with neuroblastoma. Our data suggest that PCNB could be optimized for complete genetic analysis by standardized protocols and real- time pathology assessment of specimen quality.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154667/1/pbc28153_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154667/2/pbc28153.pd

Colonic venous malformation and portal hypertension: association, management, and review of the literature

We present a case of an adolescent with lower gastrointestinal bleeding caused by a colorectal venous malformation (VM) with concomitant portal hypertension. After an episode of massive gastrointestinal bleeding, we performed an extended right hemicolectomy and resection of the VM and selective portosystemic shunt. Here, we present the case and review the literature regarding portal hypertension and gastrointestinal vascular malformations. Additionally, we discuss the physiologic and hemodynamic effects of gastrointestinal vascular malformations on the portal system

The utility of ERCP in pediatric pancreatic trauma

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Background/purpose: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an adjunct for pediatric pancreatic injury management, but its use and utility in pediatric patients are unclear. We set out to evaluate the use of ERCP and its effects on outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed for children who had pancreatic injuries at 22 pediatric trauma centers between 2010 and 2015. ERCP details and outcomes were collected. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: ERCP was used at 14/22 centers for 26 patients. Indications were duct evaluation, duct leak control, pseudocyst, fistula, and stricture. ERCP altered management or improved outcomes in 13/26 (50%), most commonly in patients with ERCP for duct evaluation, stricture, and fistula. In patients managed nonoperatively, those with early endoscopic intervention (within one week of injury) with stent or sphincterotomy (n = 9) had similar time to regular diet [median (IQR)]: [10 (7–211) vs 7 (4–12) days; p = 0.55], similar hospital days: [12 (8–20) vs 11 (6–19) days, p = 0.63], and similar time on parenteral nutrition: [17 (10–40) vs 10 (6–18) days; p = 0.19] compared to patients who were only observed. Conclusions: In children with blunt pancreatic injury, ERCP can be useful to diagnose duct injury and for management of late complications such as stricture and fistula. However, early endoscopic intervention for pancreatic duct disruption may not improve outcome or expedite recovery. Further study is needed. Study type: Retrospective Study; Treatment Study. Level of evidence: III

The utility of ERCP in pediatric pancreatic trauma

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Background/purpose: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an adjunct for pediatric pancreatic injury management, but its use and utility in pediatric patients are unclear. We set out to evaluate the use of ERCP and its effects on outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed for children who had pancreatic injuries at 22 pediatric trauma centers between 2010 and 2015. ERCP details and outcomes were collected. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: ERCP was used at 14/22 centers for 26 patients. Indications were duct evaluation, duct leak control, pseudocyst, fistula, and stricture. ERCP altered management or improved outcomes in 13/26 (50%), most commonly in patients with ERCP for duct evaluation, stricture, and fistula. In patients managed nonoperatively, those with early endoscopic intervention (within one week of injury) with stent or sphincterotomy (n = 9) had similar time to regular diet [median (IQR)]: [10 (7–211) vs 7 (4–12) days; p = 0.55], similar hospital days: [12 (8–20) vs 11 (6–19) days, p = 0.63], and similar time on parenteral nutrition: [17 (10–40) vs 10 (6–18) days; p = 0.19] compared to patients who were only observed. Conclusions: In children with blunt pancreatic injury, ERCP can be useful to diagnose duct injury and for management of late complications such as stricture and fistula. However, early endoscopic intervention for pancreatic duct disruption may not improve outcome or expedite recovery. Further study is needed. Study type: Retrospective Study; Treatment Study. Level of evidence: III

Comparison of diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of pancreatic duct injury in children: a multi-institutional analysis from the Pancreatic Trauma Study Group

© 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Purpose: Determining the integrity of the pancreatic duct is important in high-grade pancreatic trauma to guide decision making for operative vs non-operative management. Computed tomography (CT) is generally an inadequate study for this purpose, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is sometimes obtained to gain additional information regarding the duct. The purpose of this multi-institutional study was to directly compare the results from CT and MRCP for evaluating pancreatic duct disruption in children with these rare injuries. Methods: Retrospective study of data obtained from eleven pediatric trauma centers from 2010 to 2015. Children up to age 18 with suspected blunt pancreatic duct injury who had both CT and MRCP within 1 week of injury were included. Imaging findings of both studies were directly compared and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and McNemar’s tests. Results: Data were collected for 21 patients (mean age 7.8 years). The duct was visualized more often on MRCP than CT (48 vs 5%, p \u3c 0.05). Duct disruption was confirmed more often on MRCP than CT (24 vs 0%), suspected based on secondary findings equally (38 vs 38%), and more often indeterminate on CT (62 vs 38%). Overall, MRCP was not superior to CT for determining duct integrity (62 vs 38%, p = 0.28). Conclusions: In children with blunt pancreatic injury, MRCP is more useful than CT for identifying the pancreatic duct but may not be superior for confirmation of duct integrity. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram (ERCP) may be necessary to confirm duct disruption when considering pancreatic resection. Level of evidence: III