Changing trends in pseudoretinoblastoma diagnoses: A 10 year review from the United Kingdom

AIM:To study the different types and frequency of pseudoretinoblastoma (pseudoRB) lesions who present to a retinoblastoma centre due to concern that the condition may be retinoblastoma. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 341 patients presenting sporadically to the Royal London Hospital from January 2009 to December 2018. RESULTS: 220 patients (65%) were confirmed to have retinoblastoma, while 121 (35%) had pseudoRB. There were 23 differential diagnoses in total. The top 3 differential diagnoses were Coats’ disease (34%), Persistent Foetal Vasculature (PFV) (17%) and Combined Hamartoma of Retina and Retinal Pigment Epithelium (CHR-RPE) (13%). PseudoRBs differed with age at presentation. Under the age of 1 (n = 42), the most likely pseudoRB conditions were PFV (36%), Coats’ disease (17%) and CHR-RPE (12%). These conditions were also the most common simulating conditions between the ages of 1 and 2 (n = 21), but Coats’ disease was the most common in this age group (52%), followed by CHR-RPE (19%) and PFV (14%). Between the ages of 2 and 5 (n = 32), Coats’ disease remained the most common (44%) pseudoRB lesion followed by CHR-RPE (13%), or PFV, Retinal Astrocytic Hamartoma (RAH), familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) (all 6.3%). Over the age of 5 (n = 26), pseudoRBs were most likely to be Coats’ disease (35%), RAH (12%), Uveitis, CHR-RPE, FEVR (all 7.7%). CONCLUSION: 35% of suspected retinoblastoma cases are pseudoRB conditions. Overall, Coats’ disease is the most common pseudoRB condition, followed by PFV. Hamartomas (CHR-RPE & RAH) are more prevalent in this cohort, reflecting improvements in diagnostic accuracy from referring ophthalmologists

Adjuvant use of laser in eyes with macular retinoblastoma treated with primary intravenous chemotherapy

Background Adjuvant use of laser with systemic chemotherapy for treatment of retinoblastoma may reduce recurrence rates while also causing local side effects. Information is lacking on the effect of laser on visual outcomes. Methods A retrospective review of two retinoblastoma centres in the United Kingdom was conducted. Patients were included if there was a macular tumour in at least one eye. Eyes that received chemotherapy alone were compared with eyes that received chemotherapy plus adjuvant laser. Results A total of 76 patients and 91 eyes were included in the study. Systemic chemotherapy alone was used in 71 eyes while chemotherapy plus laser was used in 20 eyes. Demographic characteristics of both groups were similar. Macular relapse rates were similar between groups: 22/71 (31%) eyes in chemotherapy group and 9/20 (45%) eyes in laser group (p=0.29). There was no increase in vitreous relapses in the laser group (2/20 eyes), compared with the chemotherapy group 10/71 eyes (p=0.99). Survival analysis demonstrated similar time to first relapse between groups. Final visual acuity was equal between groups with 6/15 or better present in 31.1% of eyes in the chemotherapy group and 37.5% of eyes in the laser group (p=0.76). Presence of tumour at the fovea was predictive of final visual acuity, regardless of treatment group. Conclusion Adjuvant laser in the treatment of retinoblastoma is safe and does not lead to increased rate of vitreous recurrence. Final visual acuity is determined by the presence of tumour at the fovea and not the use of laser