Esophageal motility in low-grade reflux esophagitis, evaluated by stationary and 24-hour ambulatory manometry

Whereas previous studies have unequivocally shown that esophageal motility is abnormal in patients with severe reflux esophagitis, the results of motility testing in patients with low-grade esophagitis are inconsistent. We studied 27 patients with Savary grade I and II esophagitis and 24 healthy controls matched for age and sex. Both underwent conventional manometry and 24-h ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring. Esophageal acid exposure was greater in patients than controls. The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower in esophagitis patients [1.46 +/- 0.09 vs. 1.79 +/- 0.11 kPa (10.98 +/- 0.68 vs. 13.46 +/- 0.83 mm Hg)]. The total number of contractions recorded in the 24-h period was not different in the patient group (2168 +/- 108.4 vs. 2033 +/- 130.5), but esophagitis patients had an increased number of nontransmitted contractions (968 +/- 39.4 vs. 773 +/- 50.2, p < 0.01). A tendency toward a decreased prevalence of peristaltic contractions just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Both conventional manometry and 24-h monitoring showed no significant difference in peristaltic amplitude between the two groups. Differences in contraction duration (2.02 +/- 0.08 vs. 2.39 +/- 0.12 s, p < 0.01) and velocity of the peristaltic wave (3.65 +/- 0.10 vs. 4.63 +/- 0.13 cm/s, p < 0.01) were only detected by 24-h monitoring. The findings made in this study do not support the concept that impaired esophageal peristalsis is a major factor in the pathogenesis of low-grade esophagiti

Oesophageal motility and gastro-oesophageal reflux before and after healing of reflux oesophagitis. A study using 24 hour ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring.

In this study 24 hour oesophageal pH and pressure monitoring was used to assess oesophageal motility and acid clearance in 27 patients with reflux oesophagitis (Savary-Miller grades I-IV), before and after healing of oesophagitis. After the first 24 hour study patients were treated with omeprazole 40 mg for 8-24 weeks. After endoscopically verified healing and withdrawing omeprazole for four days 24 hour monitoring was repeated. A total of 106,630 pressure events was analysed. No significant differences were found for any of the motility variables, especially the number and the type of contractions, the peristaltic amplitude, duration, and propagation velocity did not show any changes. Separate analysis of motility variables before and after healing in the low and high grade oesophagitis groups yielded similar results. Oesophageal motor response to reflux was investigated by analysis of all contractions occurring in the two minute period after the onset of each reflux episode. Both motor response and oesophageal acid exposure (% time pH < 4, number of reflux episodes) did not change after healing of oesophagitis, thus implying that acid clearance remained unchanged. These results indicate that impaired motility in reflux oesophagitis is either an irreversible consequence of oesophageal inflammation, or a (pre-existent) factor in its pathogenesis

Ambulatory esophageal pressure and pH monitoring in patients with high-grade reflux esophagitis

Using conventional manometry and 24-hr ambulatory pressure and pH monitoring, we investigated esophageal motility and the esophageal motor response to reflux in 11 patients with reflux esophagitis Savary-Miller grade III and IV, and an age- and sex-matched group of 11 healthy controls. The patients had a significantly increased esophageal acid exposure. Conventional manometry showed a significantly decreased LES pressure and distal peristaltic amplitude in patients. The 24-hr monitoring yielded a significant decrease in peristaltic contraction duration and peristaltic propagation velocity in the patient group. Distal peristaltic amplitude was not decreased. Analysis of the contractions occurring in the 2-min period after each reflux episode showed a reduced number of contractions during the upright period, caused by a significantly decreased number of peristaltic contractions. During the supine period, there was a trend towards an increased number of contractions. It is concluded that esophageal motor activity and the response to reflux are impaired in patients with high-grade reflux esophagitis. However, the abnormalities found are only minor and are unlikely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagiti

Effects of Nissen fundoplication on gastro-oesophageal reflux and oesophageal motor function

BACKGROUND: Nissen fundoplication reduces gastro-oesophageal reflux effectively, but the mechanisms through which this effect is brought about have remained rather obscure. METHODS: In this study the effect of fundoplication on oesophageal acid exposure, oesophageal body motility, and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) was assessed prospectively. Eleven patients were studied before and 3 months after a floppy Nissen fundoplication. A Dent sleeve was used to measure LOSP, and ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring were used to evaluate oesophageal motor function. RESULTS: Gastro-oesophageal reflux was significantly decreased after fundoplication without an increase in LOSP. The motor function of the oesophageal body was not affected by the antireflux procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Nissen fundoplication is an effective antireflux operation, even though the procedure does not increase LOSP, and the motility pattern of the oesophageal body is not affected by the construction of a floppy fundic wra

Oesophageal motor response to reflux is not impaired in reflux oesophagitis.

Whether the oesophageal motor response to reflux, as recorded over 24 hours, is impaired in patients with reflux oesophagitis was investigated. Twenty three patients with oesophagitis (Savary-Miller grades I-IV) and 23 control subjects matched for age and sex underwent 24 hour ambulatory pH and pressure monitoring. All contractions occurring in the 2 minute period after the onset of each reflux episode were analysed automatically using dedicated computer algorithms. A total of 2085 reflux episodes occurred--1513 in patients and 572 in controls. Oesophageal acid exposure was greater (p < 0.01) in patients than in controls (mean (SEM) % time pH < 4 13.3 (1.7) and 5.3 (0.9)%, respectively). The mean duration of the supine reflux episodes was longer (p < 0.01) in patients (11.2 (2.8) minutes) than in controls (5.1 (1.8) minutes). In the upright period, no significant differences in the motor response to reflux were found. In the supine period, the patients showed a higher number of reflux induced contractions (4.40 (0.61) v 1.62 (0.31), p < 0.01), a higher contraction amplitude (4.55 (0.42) v 2.99 (0.71) kPa, p < 0.02) and longer contractions (1.86 (0.19) v 1.32 (0.29) seconds, p < 0.05). The percentages of peristaltic and simultaneous contractions that occurred in response to supine reflux did not differ between the two groups. In patients with reflux oesophagitis the motor response of the oesophagus to reflux is not impaired. During the supine period the response is even stronger than in healthy controls

Analysis of 24-hour esophageal pressure and pH data in unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain

Fourty-four unselected patients with noncardiac chest pain were studied using conventional manometry with additional edrophonium provocation and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH and pressure recording with a system developed by our group. New, fully automated techniques of statistical analysis of the complete set of esophageal pressure and pH signals were used to examine the temporal relation between pain, esophageal motility disturbances, and gastroesophageal reflux. The analysis used the 97.5th percentile of amplitude and duration of all esophageal contractions in each patient as well as a chi 2 test of the distribution of contraction types to determine whether a pain episode was related to abnormal motility or not. The edrophonium test results were positive in 2 patients. Only 25 patients (56.8%) had at least one pain episode (total, 111 episodes) during 24-hour recording. Thirty-three percent of the pain episodes were related to reflux and 23.4% to abnormal motility, and 43.2% were not related to an esophageal function disturbance. In the patient-oriented analysis in this study, it was required for a positive correlation that the symptom index (percentage of related pain episodes) was higher than 75%. It was found that the pain was related to reflux in 2 patients (4.6%), to reflux and motor abnormalities in 4 (9.2%), and to motor abnormalities in 2 patients (4.6%). In 36 patients (81.8%), no relation with an esophageal abnormality could be established, either because the patients had no pain during the 24-hour study, or because the pain seemed unrelated to reflux or abnormal motilit

De waarde van ambulante 24-uursslokdarmmanometrie bij de diagnostiek van retrosternale pijn van niet-cardiale origine

The clinical relevance of a system of ambulatory 24-hour oesophageal pressure and pH recording with automated data analysis was investigated in 33 unselected patients with non-cardiac chest pain. After conventional manometry with edrophonium (Tensilon) provocation, 24-hour oesophageal pH and pressure monitoring was performed. In 17 patients conventional manometry, edrophonium provocation and 24-hour pH recording revealed an oesophageal origin of the symptoms: 6 patients had oesophageal motility disorders, 3 were positive responders to edrophonium and 8 had chest pain associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux. In none of the patients who had a pain attack during prolonged oesophageal pressure recording, was a new motility disorder detecte