Use of interrupter technique in assessment of bronchial responsiveness in normal subjects

BACKGROUND: A number of subjects, especially the very young and the elderly, are unable to cooperate and to perform forced expiratory manoeuvres in the evaluation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). The objective of our study was to investigate the use of the interrupter technique as a method to measure the response to provocation and to compare it with the conventional PD(20 )FEV(1). METHODS: We studied 170 normal subjects, 100 male and 70 female (mean ± SD age, 38 ± 8.5 and 35 ± 7.5 years, respectively), non-smoking from healthy families. These subjects had no respiratory symptoms, rhinitis or atopic history. A dosimetric cumulative inhalation of methacholine was used and the response was measured by the dose which increases baseline end interruption resistance by 100% (PD(100)Rint, EI) as well as by percent dose response ratio (DRR). RESULTS: BHR at a cut-off level of 0.8 mg methacholine exhibited 31 (18%) of the subjects (specificity 81.2%), 21 male and 10 female, while 3% showed a response in the asthmatic range. The method was reproducible and showed good correlation with PD(20)FEV(1 )(r = 0.76, p < 0.005), with relatively narrow limits of agreement at -1.39 μmol and 1.27 μmol methacholine, respectively, but the interrupter methodology proved more sensitive than FEV(1 )in terms of reactivity (DRR). CONCLUSIONS: Interrupter methodology is clinically useful and may be used to evaluate bronchial responsiveness in normal subjects and in situations when forced expirations cannot be performed

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2023/24: G protein-coupled receptors.

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2023/24 is the sixth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews, mostly in tabular format, of the key properties of approximately 1800 drug targets, and about 6000 interactions with about 3900 ligands. There is an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (https://www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide constitutes almost 500 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. It provides a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates. The full contents of this section can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/bph.16177. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. The landscape format of the Concise Guide is designed to facilitate comparison of related targets from material contemporary to mid-2023, and supersedes data presented in the 2021/22, 2019/20, 2017/18, 2015/16 and 2013/14 Concise Guides and previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (NC-IUPHAR), therefore, providing official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate

Positioning industrial design students to operate at the 'fuzzy front end': Investigating a new arena of university design education

10.1007/s10798-010-9133-5International Journal of Technology and Design Education214425-447IJDE

Chemokine receptor oligomerization to tweak chemotactic responses

Chemokine receptors guide cell migration by responding to local chemokine gradients during immune surveillance and inflammation. Similar to other G protein-coupled receptors, chemokine receptors can form oligomeric complexes that might have distinct pharmacological and biochemical properties as compared to their individual constituents. The majority of evidence for chemokine receptor oligomers came from transfected cells using tagged receptors to monitor their close proximity or physical association. However, translation of these observations to (patho)-physiological consequences is puzzling for the majority of chemokine receptor oligomers due to experimental limitations and challenges to distinguish oligomer- from downstream signaling-mediated crosstalk. Recent methodological advances allow in situ validation of chemokine receptor oligomers in native cells, disruption of oligomers, and detection of oligomer-mediated signaling. Chemokine receptor oligomerization modulates cell migration in (patho)-physiology and consequently offers novel therapeutic targets