40 research outputs found
Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether physical activity (in general, and
more specifically, walking and cycling during leisure time and for commuting purposes, sports and
gardening) is an underlying mechanism in the relationship between the amount of green space in
people's direct living environment and self-perceived health. To study this, we first investigated
whether the amount of green space in the living environment is related to the level of physical
activity. When an association between green space and physical activity was found, we analysed
whether this could explain the relationship between green space and health.
Methods: The study includes 4.899 Dutch people who were interviewed about physical activity,
self-perceived health and demographic and socioeconomic background. The amount of green space
within a one-kilometre and a three-kilometre radius around the postal code coordinates was
calculated for each individual. Multivariate multilevel analyses and multilevel logistic regression
analyses were performed at two levels and with controls for socio-demographic characteristics and
urbanicity.
Results: No relationship was found between the amount of green space in the living environment
and whether or not people meet the Dutch public health recommendations for physical activity,
sports and walking for commuting purposes. People with more green space in their living
environment walked and cycled less often and fewer minutes during leisure time; people with more
green space garden more often and spend more time on gardening. Furthermore, if people cycle
for commuting purposes they spend more time on this if they live in a greener living environment.
Whether or not people garden, the time spent on gardening and time spent on cycling for
commuting purposes did not explain the relationship between green space and health.
Conclusion: Our study indicates that the amount of green space in the living environment is
scarcely related to the level of physical activity. Furthermore, the amount of physical activity
undertaken in greener living environments does not explain the relationship between green space
and health.
Stimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise (STRIDE) - CTN 0037: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is a need for novel approaches to the treatment of stimulant abuse and dependence. Clinical data examining the use of exercise as a treatment for the abuse of nicotine, alcohol, and other substances suggest that exercise may be a beneficial treatment for stimulant abuse, with direct effects on decreased use and craving. In addition, exercise has the potential to improve other health domains that may be adversely affected by stimulant use or its treatment, such as sleep disturbance, cognitive function, mood, weight gain, quality of life, and anhedonia, since it has been shown to improve many of these domains in a number of other clinical disorders. Furthermore, neurobiological evidence provides plausible mechanisms by which exercise could positively affect treatment outcomes. The current manuscript presents the rationale, design considerations, and study design of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Clinical Trials Network (CTN) CTN-0037 Stimulant Reduction Intervention using Dosed Exercise (STRIDE) study.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>STRIDE is a multisite randomized clinical trial that compares exercise to health education as potential treatments for stimulant abuse or dependence. This study will evaluate individuals diagnosed with stimulant abuse or dependence who are receiving treatment in a residential setting. Three hundred and thirty eligible and interested participants who provide informed consent will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: Vigorous Intensity High Dose Exercise Augmentation (DEI) or Health Education Intervention Augmentation (HEI). Both groups will receive TAU (i.e., usual care). The treatment arms are structured such that the quantity of visits is similar to allow for equivalent contact between groups. In both arms, participants will begin with supervised sessions 3 times per week during the 12-week acute phase of the study. Supervised sessions will be conducted as one-on-one (i.e., individual) sessions, although other participants may be exercising at the same time. Following the 12-week acute phase, participants will begin a 6-month continuation phase during which time they will attend one weekly supervised DEI or HEI session.</p> <p>Clinical Trials Registry</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov, <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01141608">NCT01141608</a></p> <p><url>http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01141608?term=Stimulant+Reduction+Intervention+using+Dosed+Exercise&rank=1</url></p
Construction workers working in musculoskeletal pain and engaging in leisure-time physical activity: Findings from a mixed-methods pilot study
BACKGROUND: While exercise has been shown beneficial for some musculoskeletal pain conditions, construction workers who are regularly burdened with musculoskeletal pain may engage less in leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) due to pain. In a small pilot study, we investigate how musculoskeletal pain may influence participation in LTPA among construction workers. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed using a jobsite-based survey (n=43) among workers at two commercial construction sites and one focus group (n=5). RESULTS: Over 93% of these construction workers reported engaging in LTPA and 70% reported musculoskeletal pain. Fifty-seven percent of workers who met either moderate or vigorous LTPA guidelines reported lower extremity pain (i.e. ankle, knee) compared with 21% of those who did not engage in either LTPA (p=0.04). Focus group analyses indicate that workers felt they already get significant physical activity out of their job because they are “moving all the time and not sitting behind a desk.” Workers also felt they “have no choice but to work through pain and discomfort [as the worker] needs to do anything to get the job done.” CONCLUSION: Pilot study findings suggest that construction workers not only engage in either moderate or vigorous LTPA despite musculoskeletal pain but workers in pain engage in more LTPA than construction workers without pain
FTO Genotype and the Weight Loss Benefits of Moderate Intensity Exercise
The fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) gene was genotyped for the participants in the Dose-Response to Exercise in postmenopausal Women (DREW) trial and analyses were performed to determine if an FTO variant was associated with adiposity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) before and after 6 months of moderate intensity exercise in Caucasian women (N=234). The A/A homozygotes for rs8050136 had a higher body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) compared to C/C homozygotes at baseline (32.8 (0.6) vs. 31.0 (0.4) respectively; p<0.05) and at follow-up (31.9 (0.6) vs. 30.4 (0.5) respectively; p<0.05). Weight loss occurred post exercise, but there was no significant genotype by exercise interaction over time. Exploratory analyses among women exposed to moderate intensity exercise meeting, or exceeding, the physical activity recommendation found that those homozygous A/A lost significantly more weight than the C allele carriers (−3.3 (0.7) kg vs. −1.4 (0.4) kg and −1.5 (0.5) kg respectively; p<0.05). Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), defined as VO(2peak) (oxygen consumption), increased post exercise and the magnitude of the increase was similar for each genotype. In conclusion, women genetically predisposed to being obese experienced weight loss and CRF benefits with moderate intensity exercise, with additional weight loss observed when the women met or exceeded the physical activity recommendations