84 research outputs found

    Ruxolitinib in patients with polycythemia vera resistant and/or intolerant to hydroxyurea:European observational study

    Get PDF
    Background: Hydroxyurea (HU) is a commonly used first-line treatment in patients with polycythemia vera (PV). However, approximately 15%–24% of PV patients report intolerance and resistance to HU. Methods: This phase IV, European, real-world, observational study assessed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in PV patients who were resistant and/or intolerant to HU, with a 24-month follow-up. The primary objective was to describe the profile and disease burden of PV patients. Results: In the 350 enrolled patients, 70% were &gt;60 years old. Most patients (59.4%) had received ≥1 phlebotomy in the 12 months prior to the first dose of ruxolitinib. Overall, 68.2% of patients achieved hematocrit control with 92.3% patients having hematocrit &lt;45% and 35.4% achieved hematologic remission at month 24. 85.1% of patients had no phlebotomies during the study. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 54.3% of patients and the most common event was anemia (22.6%). Of the 10 reported deaths, two were suspected to be study drug-related. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ruxolitinib treatment in PV maintains durable hematocrit control with a decrease in the number of phlebotomies in the majority of patients and was generally well tolerated.</p

    Resistance at virological failure using boosted protease inhibitors versus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as first-line antiretroviral therapy - Implications for sustained efficacy of ART in resource-limited settings

    No full text
    Background Increases in the prevalence of resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) have been observed among previously untreated individuals in all areas of sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to examine whether first-line use of 2 NRTIs plus a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) could protect against emergence of NRTI resistance mutations, compared to the use of 2 NRTIs plus 1 NNRTI.MethodsWe carried out a weighted meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing bPI- with NNRTI-based first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens using random effects modeling.ResultsIn intention to treat analyses, there was no difference in the risk of viral failure at week 48 between NNRTI and bPI (P =. 19). At week 48, the overall difference between NNRTI- and PI-based regimens in selection of any major NRTI resistance mutation (crude unweighted prevalence 3.3% vs 1.6%) was 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4-3.0; P =. 00927). There was a statistically significant difference in prevalence of K65R when comparing NNRTI (1.3%) with PI (0.67%); absolute weighted difference 1.0% (95% CI, 3-1.7; P =. 00447). There was also a significant difference in prevalence of M184V/I between NNRTI and PI (crude unweighted prevalence 3.2% vs 1.4%); difference 1.6% (95% CI 0.1-3.1; P =. 0368).ConclusionsDespite the equivalent efficacy and more favorable resistance implications of PI- versus NNRTI-based first line therapy, widespread use of PI-based first-line therapy is not warranted at this time, due to resource limitations and predicted increased risk of resistance-related failure of NNRTI/NRTI second-line regimens. PI-based first-line therapy could be reconsidered when antiretroviral agents from other classes become available for second-line regimens in resource-limited settings. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Fatal ventricular tachycardia in association with propafenone, a new class IC antiarrhythmic agent.

    No full text
    A man with a past history of malignant ventricular arrhythmias occurring late after myocardial infarction was admitted for assessment. Monitoring revealed frequent ventricular premature beats and occasional non-sustained runs of ventricular tachycardia. Other drugs having failed, he was started on oral propafenone which is a new Vaughan Williams class IC antiarrhythmic agent. Several hours after starting this drug he had incessant ventricular tachycardia and subsequently died. Other class IC agents have been shown to have a high incidence of proarrhythmic effects, and particular care should be taken with these potent new drugs
    corecore