Le syst\ue8me politique des Etats-Unis est-il en train de s'autod\ue9truire?

Il capitolo esamina l'evoluzione del sistema politico degli Stati Uniti indagando le ragioni della crescente polarizzazione tra i due partiti maggiori. Le trasformazioni dei mass media e della comunicazione politica, il mutamento della prassi parlamentare, la sfiducia nelle \ue9lite e l'ascesa del populismo sono i principali fattori esaminati per spiegare la scomparsa della "bipartisanship"

A pragmatic regime of arrangement. Below the public, beyond the familiar

peer reviewedDans cette étude, je propose de définir les propriétés d’un nouveau régime pragmatique d’action que j’ai nommé « régime de l’arrangement ». Après un rappel de quelques travaux sur les régimes d’action développés dans l’optique de la sociologie pragmatique, j’ai souligné l’importance des figures de l’arrangement dans différents domaines de la vie sociale. En pointant l’ambiguïté sémantique de l’arrangement, j’ai pu dégager les dispositions, ressources et modalités pratiques qui me permettent de le considérer comme un régime hybride se positionnant au-delà du familier, mais en deçà du public

Arrangment

editorial reviewedAnalyse des différentes figures de l’arrangement en partant d’exemples empruntés à des domaines multiples de la vie sociale et en montrant que l’arrangement est souvent cantonné à des relations privilégiées, personnelles, amicales, de proximité et de familiarité

Compromise

editorial reviewedRéflexion synthétique sur le compromis, sur ses racines sémantiques, ses ressorts et sa place dans différents domaines de la vie sociale et la pensée sociale et politiqu

"Spontaneous Revolution” in Tunisia. Yearnings for Freedom, Justice, and Dignity

peer reviewedReflexion about the Tunisian revolutio

Beyond Pragmatic Sociology: A Theoretical Compromise between ‘Critical Sociology’ and the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’

A critical analysis of Boltanski's sociological contributio

Le compromis, rationalité et valeur. Esquisse d’une approche sociologique

The authors propose a reflection on the status of compromise in European sociological tradition, and more particularly in two classical authors, Durkheim and Weber, as well as in several contemporary authors who follow in Weber’s footsteps. After having noted the absence of any reference to the idea of compromise in Durkheim’s work, they posit that it is nevertheless possible to detect the presence of compromise as an implicit category in Weber’s writings, notably through his distinction between different ethics. While it is explicitly present in the contemporary authors examined, the concept is related to the different proceduralization theories found in Habermas, Crozier, Sainsaulieu and Reynaud

Transition to democracy in Tunisia. Learning about citizenship in a national and transnational context

La transition en Tunisie a constitué un moment fort d'apprentissage de la démocratie

The morality in/of compromise: some

This article aims to highlight the position occupied by compromise in the field of ethics. The argument is set out in two stages. First, the author attempts to clarify the contours of compromise by treating it as both a procedure or process of conflict resolution and a goal or ‘‘solution’’ to be achieved. In the second stage, he examines the distinction that could be made between ‘‘morality in compromise’’ and ‘‘morality of compromise’’, so as to measure its import and show how compromise not only contains elements specific to morality as a system but can also be a form of morality in itself