2 research outputs found
Stenting Esophageal Disease
In 1885, Charles Symonds placed the first rigid endoprosthesis across a malignant esophageal
stricture. With the introduction of the fiberoptic endoscope and the development of
the rigid Celestin tube nearly one century later, the revolution was initiated. Over the past 2
decades, esophageal stents have drastically improved. Prior to 1990, stents were made from
rigid polyvinyl plastic or rubber. These prostheses were able to restore luminal patency, however
placement was difficult and bleeding, pain, and perforations frequently occurred. In
the early nineties, rigid endoprostheses were replaced by uncovered self-expandable metal
stents (SEMS). SEMS placement appeared to be less invasive, provided wider lumen, and was
associated with fewer complications. However, new problems soon appeared. Through the
uncovered mesh tumor ingrowth frequently occurred, leading to recurrent dysphagia shortly
after placement. To impede tissue ingrowth, SEMS were modified with a plastic or silicone
layer in the middle of the endoprosthesis. These partially-covered SEMS (PCSEMS) were not
only able to re-open a blocked esophagus, but also sealed malignant esophagorespiratory
fistulae. In 2001, removable fully covered metal stents (FCSEMS) and plastic stents (SEPS)
were introduced. The ability to remove these stents after deployment has opened up new
applications, such as the insertion of a stents as a temporary device in patients with benign
esophageal fistulae or stenosis and to bridge chemo- and radiotherapy in patients with
malignant esophageal disease. Initial results were suboptimal as well. Fully-covered expandable
stents were associated with a higher migration rate. SEMS are generally preloaded
in a thin delivery catheter, yet FCSEPS require being loaded onto the significantly larger and
stiffer delivery device