4 research outputs found
ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Crataegus L. Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π½Π΄ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π΄Π° ΠΈΠΌ. Π.Π. Π¦ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π ΠΠ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Ρ ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΎΠ·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π³Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²
This study was conducted to consider the issue of assessment the degree of decorative effect for the genus Crataegus L. in the collection of arboretum of the N.V. Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Science (MBG RAS) as promising plants in green building. A comprehensive assessment of decorative effect for hawthorn plants has been carried out. A technique was used to evaluate the plants on 30 criteria, i.e. habitus of the plant; architectonics of the crown; bark color and texture; color, shape and size of the leaves; size of the flowers, color of the corolla and anther sacs; external appearance attractivity of the fruit, their size, shape and color. 20 species of Crataegus have received a broad comprehensive assessment of decorative value. The results of the study make it possible to recommend some representatives of the genus Crataegus with the best ornamental qualities for the use under conditions of metropolis. Among them there are 12 taxa: C. ambigua, C. crus-galli, C. horrida, C. laurentiana var. brunetiana, C. monogyna, C. orientobaltica, C. pinnatifida, C. punctata, C. songarica, C. submollis, C. turcomanica, C. wattiana. By using the given type species in green building it will increase the aesthetic quality of woody landscape plants and improve the architectural and artistic appearance of the metropolis.Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ Π²ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Crataegus Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π½Π΄ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π€Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ Β«ΠΠ»Π°Π²Π½ΡΠΉ Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π΄ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π.Π. Π¦ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°Β» Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΊ (ΠΠΠ‘ Π ΠΠ) Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ Π·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±ΠΎΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ². ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ 30 ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΌ, Π² ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅: ΠΏΠΎ Π³Π°Π±ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ; Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½Ρ; ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΡ; ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅, ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈ Π²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅Π²; ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅ Π²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²; ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ, ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠ΅. Π¨ΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ 19 Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Crataegus. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΊ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π³Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ° 12 ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠ² Crataegus, ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΠΈΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ: C. ambigua, C. crus-galli, C. horrida, C. laurentiana var. brunetiana, C. monogyna, C. orientobaltica, C. pinnatifida, C. punctata, C. songarica, C. submollis, C. turcomanica, C. wattiana. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π·Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄ΡΠ΅Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊ ΠΌΠ΅Π³Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°
Total flavonoids in crataegus Β«Flowers with leavesΒ» raw material of Russian Flora
The total flavonoid content of various species of Crataegus novel raw material- Β«flowers with leavesΒ» was conducted to a comparative study in order to identify the possibility of co-harvesting material from different species. 27 samples of 6 pharmacopoeial and 7 nonpharmacopoeial Crataegus species obtained from the Biological Collections of VILAR, Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden RAS, Kuzbass, Penza and Stavropol Botanical Gardens, Altai Territory, Voronezh region, Kemerovo and Moscow harvested in Russian Federation were analyzed. Spectrophotometric assay based on aluminium complex formation was used for determination of total flavonoid expressed as hyperoside. The fractional composition of the raw material (percentage of leaves and stems) and its influence on the content of flavonoids was studied. The total flavonoids expressed as hyperoside of the raw material "flowers with leaves" of pharmacopoeial Crataegus species ranged from 1.40Β±0.05% (C. chlorocarpa) to 2.20Β±0.11% (C. monogyna), nonpharmacopeal species - from 1.21Β±0.11% (C. maximowiczii) to 2.21Β±0.09% (C. ambigua). The average quantity was 1.65%. The total flavonoid values of non-pharmacopoeial species raw material were comparable with pharmacopoeial species thus it allows to consider them promising for further study and use of their parts for medical purpose. Β© Altai State University. All rights reserved